Apr 16, 2014Great artwork, reasonable graphics. Developer failing on pretty much every other level. Terrible treatment of customers, 0 appreciation for people that give them tons of time and effort for free, and most of all they are a truly money grubbing little outfit that will stop at nothing to turn a buck. Do not give this game your money, you will likely regret it. PGI has lied on the delivery of communtiy warfare, core features of ui 2.0, and failed to meet deadlines in such a horrible manner it's incredible this company is still in business quite frankly.… Expand
Apr 7, 2014This was one of the worst games I have played in a long time. I have played almost every Mech Warrior coming into this beta. With full potential, I started plaything MWO at beta, then slowly went to open beta. Just when you would start to get used to the game play, the DEV's would do some adjustment to heat detection, hit detection, and/or strength of the weapons. Upon every change was a new version but worse with more bugs. Slowly there would be fixes to the bugs and slowly they would add more features. As the game became more robust and started gaining followers, the old mech warrior fans started to die off seeing that shimmer at the end of the tunnel diminish. The game play got worse becoming over burden with rules and strange mathematical equations to find the best way to blow someone up. Unfortunately, every time you got settled in and started winning they would throw another wrench in the game. Now if you have an extremely highly performance graphics card you will enjoy playing this game with some of the highest frame rates known to the gaming industry. As a professional programmer, I can tell you that this game is not optimally programmed and they obviously have no clue how to interact with the game engine. I think you can find better displays of physics on Mario for Nintendo and better hit detection from mortal combat on Sega Genesis. Thank you for making an awesome game a complete pile of garbage.… Expand
Mar 31, 2014Been playing this quarter-baked title since SEP12, and it's been a ride. However, it has been a good ride for the most part. It's been broken and fixed, and broken, and it's currently broken. The staff has taken an approach that many saw coming.
Gameplay is good, even with borked balance it's still fun to play. It's just not as fun as other titles. The thing that keeps me is the radically unique experience you get while playing. It's very simulator-like while still being fast-paced enough to be entertaining.
What keeps the game from getting a good rating is their approach. Which speaks more of the developer PGI than the title itself. The staff is quite amateur with balance changes swinging wildly from one spectrum to the other instead of incremental changes. The SEVERE lack of content such as maps, community warfare, private matches, lobbies, persistence, and such are still lacking with the ubiquitous "Coming Soon" that we've had for over 2 years now.
Instead the developer is more concerned with pumping our "booster packs" of terrible mechs to avoid the "P2W" tag, and making a patch overpower a certain weapon then put a hero mech on that abuses the broken weapon so people will buy up only to nerf it into the ground in the next patch.
The lead for this game has crutched it with cheap gimmicks and lawyering. If this unique game had a true competitor we'd see more true content. But until then, Russ Bullock and crew will make this another title to add to his long list of "minimally viable" games.… Expand
Mar 21, 2014I don't understand all the hate around this game but this is one of those very very few games that I am still playing a year after downloading it! First off, this is an excellent time filler game which allows you to jump into a skirmish and finish a around within something like 10 mins. This is awesome for those few mins breaks which you simply need to let off some steam. In this aspect, not having a strong storyline or some kind of meta campaign works in its advantage... just jump into your favorite mech and then shoot away. Next is of course, almost all of your fav mechs are in there! If you are a mechwarrior or battletech fan, there's just no reason to pass this up. On top of that, I have played every single mechwarrior PC game since I was young 20 years ago and I must say this one is the most realistic of all... extremely heavy feel, nice real cockpit and immersion along with weapons that really feel heavy and impactful. All in all, this is one game that I will continue to pay real money for my fav mechs for years to come.… Expand
Feb 15, 2014Before I move into the review, I must state that these results are skewed when you take into consideration the following: This game was brought up without the use of advertising or significant marketing techniques, meaning its fan base is primarily hardcore Mechwarrior fans. Second, this game is entirely free and relies on donations, optional premium memberships and optional in game purchases, so the funding for the development team is likely pretty low. Third, this game was designed using a game engine that does not play towards the strengths of Mechwarrior (I'm currently using Cryengine 3 in my current dev teams work, so I do understand some of the strengths it plays towards). Now on to my review.
If there is one thing that Cryengine does well, its graphics. While not entirely optimized for mid to lower level PC's, this game plays with a decent framerate. The maps are definitely designed to look the part, and from afar this game looks pretty good. The animations for the mechs and the mech models themselves actually look really good and grabbed my attention. All in all, the game LOOKS good.
I'm not going to give a rating for sounds and music mostly because there is not too much to go off of. What music does play, especially at the beginning of a round, really gets you pumped, but primarily sound is not really utilized in this game (unlike the single-player predecessors).
The scheme of gameplay has a HUGE amount of great concepts. The weapons systems are done well and for the most part follow that of its predecessor. Weapon grouping is heavily utilized and done well (groups can even be changed in game on the fly) and does not detract from gameplay at all. Heating is done well, as was mech cooling, shutdown and system overrides. Aiming, firing, and basic weapons usage are where the game detracts a bit from its good concepts. This game caters towards the SKILLED PLAYER, or at least attempts to make you into one. For most players, these fire systems will be difficult to use as you must utilize an independently moving torso AS WELL AS independent arms (if you disable the lock in the menu). The current scheme is difficult to use with mouse and keyboard, and it can frustrate a large number of players because of the difficulty of using weapons. Mouse acceleration (at least in my experience) cannot be disabled in-game and has detracted somewhat from my gameplay. It is hard to describe entirely what makes this fire scheme so frustrating at times, but, for lack of any better descriptions, I would best describe it as "clunky" and "unpolished"
Game Modes: 6/10
Honestly, the game modes are done well, but there is not a lot making them different from other games. Quite average to say the least. One thing that threw a lot of players away from this game was the lack of a single player campaign, which, while certainly understandable, is what made a lot of Mechwarrior games shine. As for the multiplayer, they do a FANTASTIC job at forcing the players to work together. Lone wolves do not last long in this game, but the system is still unpolished. They enable VOIP, but the multiplayer system feels like it could be expanded upon. While it would be understandably difficult to do, I feel that the devs could learn a thing or two from Planetside 2 and how they forced cooperation. Unfortunately, they are designed with totally different game schemes, but nonetheless there are some aspects that could be learned.
Miscellaneous (UI, Server reliability, etc): 5/10
The first UI was crap. No other way of describing it. The second UI improved on the first, but also lost some of its better features (crap 2.0). While it is progress, it is still severely unpolished. You had no idea what the reliability of a server was going into it, and the game does not seem to entice players to continue working together after a single game. The number of purchases required to avoid grinding is annoying at times, but understandable. It would have been better for a cheaper premium (i.e. $5 monthly), but even better for a one time purchase up front. The premiums have an ENORMOUS advantage over the average players, and even more so if they are skilled, but that does not mean the average player isn't catered to. For both premium and normal players, the Mech lab is done incredibly well and realistically; it really makes the game feel like a Mechwarrior game. So yes, it has its ups and downs, but I feel that if this game were designed and tested in an alternate or more traditional fashion, that it probably would've done well.
This is not a bad game. It just wasn't paid enough attention, both by the market and the devs. It could have been something good, but it still feels too much like a fan-made ripoff. I would still recommend taking a look. I think something good can be taken from this game.… Expand
Feb 8, 2014This is by far the worst game development I have ever witnessed. UI 2.0 is yet another example of the PGI development strategy of ignore your users, release unfinished poorly thought out content. Looking at it I have to wonder just "what" or whom they were designing it for. The promised CW has seen more development in the heated exchanges on the now 2 Reddit communities then we will ever likely see in game. This is a product I would avoid as I do not see it lasting another year unless some serious editing is done to the staff at PGI.… Expand
Feb 3, 2014This game was very fun for a long time, but the developers seem to have lost their focus. Development moves at a glacial pace and game balance seesaws between marked improvements and complete de-evolution from patch to patch. The game is at least 10 months behind schedule, with features that were originally due in May/June 2013 now on the calendar for the next couple of months, in the meantime the devs are denying any delays in their schedule and are adamant it is all going according to plan. The community is also a troubling point, with most of the players you meet ingame being perfectly polite, and yet the forums tend to be full of poisonously hostile threads.
Once the game finally delivers on its promises, it might not be so bad. As it stands, it is competent and playable, but not a great choice in comparison to other free to play games out right now. At least it IS free to play.… Expand
Jan 31, 2014I was playing MWO from CBT up to release in September, then I have taken a pause and came back in January. What I can say: level of progress is poor, devs still unable to solve problems with hit detection ( especially when ping difference is higher then 100), still only ONE server, and same **** as always: realising new skins and mechs and selling future mech packs: "last chance to buy clan pack or etc." - help us to improve game and someday, maybe, in "grim, dark future" you will get excellent mechwarrior game. If you wish, you can spend your money now, but I suggest you not to do it, at least till they will implement faction warfare and fix all bugs.Rated 1.… Expand
Jan 26, 2014Revising my score from a 3 to a 1 after the huge misstep that was the clan mech cash grab. This was further compounded by the "state of the inner sphere" post where the devs reveal that they've essentially been treading water, and lying to us, about feature development while they worked on getting the Mechwarrior license extended by Microsoft. CW, a feature that should have been present at launch, is now estimated as coming in Oct 2014. Who wants to spend another year mindlessly grinding cbills? Not this guy. PGI is an amateur outfit and they aren't capable of executing this game properly.
Don't get your hopes up or waste your money. This game will never be anything more than mindless grind. So much wasted opportunity.… Expand
Jan 13, 2014As a Mechwarrior title, I expected this to be that game we have been waiting for. That game that would put the latest AAA titles to shame. As a free to play game, I didn't expect much. The sad truth is that I had gotten what I expected. Not much.
The game is unique as its own. For a free to play title as well, it stands out among many other titles. It's refreshing to the genre, in which I am very glad to see. The downside is how the game itself is executed. It's a basic Mechwarrior game. You have Mechs (that are based on the Battletech universe) kill each other in a mindless game mode, get money, the end. Fin. That's how the core game is. There are 3 games modes as of now, there were only 2 at launch. The launch was quite a shame to be. The 3 game modes are Assault, Conquest, and Skirmish. In assault, you kill the enemy team or capture their base, in Conquest, you kill the enemy team, or get 750 resources (in reality, there are just more bases), in skirmish, there are no bases; and that is all. The game modes aren't unique at all, and they can become very boring and repetitive at times.
The gameplay is quite good, as said before, it's refreshing to the free to play category. Mech customization is nice but sometimes feels too restrictive. It's semi-tactical, not as I expected it to be (I wanted it to be as tactical and strategic as the Arma series but got a basic game instead). You have 4 different classes: Light, Medium, Heavy, and Assault. They have their different roles, but it almost feels like the current game always encourages one type of style. High Alpha, pin-point damage, LRMs or something else. A lot of the times you will find the same type of builds in almost every single match. No one has the creativity or skill to come up with their own unique and effective build. It seems as if there is only one build that works. Another gripe are modules. These act as perks and killstreak rewards from the modern Call of Duty franchise. You push a button to call in airstrike, you have your passive ability that scans for things. The game would feel much more balanced if these were removed so no one can have a benefit.
The graphics are really nice, as they run off the Cryengine 3, however. The game has pretty bad performance issues. White Knights cannot run to their only reason for it being "beta" anymore. The only aspect that actually made the game "Beta" was the beta logo. That was literally the only thing making it beta. There are a lot of missing content from the game. Such as Community Warfare, which was planned long ago and was said that it was being developed when it actually wasn't. That is the biggest complaint of mine about the current game. The massive lack of any features.
Matchmaking seems to be almost ruined. I am a PUG, yes a PUG which is for some reason ridiculed on the forums and is a reason why I don't want to talk to most people on them. As for the matches, most of them now feel like steam rolls. By steam rolls I mean, your team either wins fast and the enemy gets 4 kills or less; or you lose and your team gets 4 kills or less. They are never fun, they weren't like this before, I'm not sure how matches suddenly got like this.
What bothers me the absolute most is that there is no progression system. The game can feel like a huge grind at times since your only real incentive is money (C-Bills). Apparently C-Bills were inflated before as PGI has actually decreased the income of everyone drastically. *A Warning For New Players* be careful not to spend any money for a while. The game does not encourage experimentation, it actually punishes you, so keep that in mind and spend your C-Bills wisely. Other than money, there are mech skills, which are more of a grind since they require a large amount of C-Bills to use on mechs. It feels like you're getting no where. You can have 100 Billion C-bills, and if you try to explore a variety of options, you will end up broke. It ends up becoming a huge turn off for new players who can be potential customers.
There are a lack of basic features that make any game all the better such as in game voice chat, a real clan system, and a nice variety of maps and game modes. When basic features are added, I wish that PGI would consider community work for the game, it's always a good thing. The game is also very expensive, as they have $500, golden mechs that are somehow limited in quantity even though they are digital. I understand that it's free to play and that you don't have to buy anything. If they would lower the prices, they would sell more and make more money, a win win for everyone. As a F2P game, anyone can play, no one is obligated to pay, it was the devs choice for making the title F2P.
It's definitely not the Mechwarrior game we have all been waiting for but it is a good free to play title worth checking out, just not good as a Mechwarrior title itself. Still worth checking out though.… Expand
Jan 5, 2014ok coming from a hardcore 15 year mechwarrior vet and haveing played mechwarrior2 31th GBL merc, mechwarrior 3 & pirates moon, mechwarrior 4 mw4 blackknight & MW4 merc and just too let you know i waz even first round closed beta
now too start this off even in close beta and gameplay my expectations waz very high for this game the game play at the most part seemed in my mind at the time good and well balanced but the cataphract wasn't out so you didn't see any jump sniping yet and ppc still didnt work so the reason i probably love this game back then waz it waz all brawling back then i love brawling in mechwarrior
now iv played all mechwarrior's and this one felt good but the sniping dominates the out of this game now
too top that PGI is now full of themselves and disrespects the true fans of the mechwarrior game and name too make it one big farce too end all farces.
they have slaped me a core mechwarrior fan and founders supporter in the face too the point i wont give them anymore money.
they have a huge grind for you too get over and if you want too buy any MC (mechwarrior credits) you will find your paying out of your ass for such a mind numbing game.
this game mocks and destorys the name MECHWARRIOR and makes me want too cry my self too sleep for how bad they this game up and if they didnt do everything wrong like every outher mechwarrior witch they said they try too never do like 3PV and flush OMG that 1st post for flush module almost made me punch my screen like ****?!>!>!?
PGI can suck my dick Chris roberts deserves my money so far 600us dollars of it XD… Expand
Jan 4, 2014I put lots of money into this game and leveled up almost all the Mechs. I asked if I could sell my account on the forums and they banned me permanently. But it is their loss and my gain, I had already put hundreds of dollars into this game, and I was considering spending more on the Clan Mechs. The fact is there is no real content or purpose of this game, you just grind out skill on mechs. They promise things like community warfare then sell you $500 mechs. Being banned will save me possibly a thousand dollars in the long run!… Expand
Jan 1, 2014While the core gameplay is solid, everything else about this title is bad. The developers have again and again failed to deliver on their promises and seems completely at a loss as to how to take the project further than a 'mom's-basement-operation'. Still, for longtime fans there might be some fun to be had getting acquainted with Inner Sphere mechs they might not have used in earlier titles (as they are typically rendered obsolete as soon as clan-tech is available).… Expand
Dec 19, 2013MechWarrior Online was pitched as being a thinking man's shooter with depth and complexity, an overarching 'Community Warfare' territory control meta game with specialization options depending on the mech you pilot (called role warfare).
The current state of the game is as follows:
-Hit detection is buggy, and not just for high ping players. You will see a gauss slug hit the chest of a stationary assault mech but sometimes no damage registers.
-Alternately hits will sometimes slam into invisible terrain hit boxes that extend beyond the visible edge of terrain, making shooting over anything a guessing game.
-There are only two game modes assault (capture the 1 base) and conquest (capture the 5 bases)
-Role warfare does not exist. There are no scouting or fire support skill trees. Every single mech from a 25 ton commando to a 100 ton atlas gets *exactly the same skill unlocks*
-Community warfare was supposed to be in January 2013. It is now 11 months later and the centrepiece feature/the overarching metagame does not exist yet.
-They took money from founders (I paid 120 dollars) after advertising the game as first person view only, then they put in a 3pv camera against the will of the core players that is only good for peeking over terrain. I stopped playing as soon as this was implemented and will not play again.… Expand
Dec 18, 2013This games rapes your childhood memories of battletech and mechwarrior. It blatantly ignores canon in the battletech universe and have completely ignored the worst issues in the previous multiplayer mechwarrior games. Its a never ending round of 'balancing' changes that prove the devs are brain dead incompetent and ignore their fan base.
Dec 17, 2013It's a shame a such beautiful and important franchise like Mechwarrior has been devastated by PGI.
They are currently sacking the users and it looks they'll do it again and again.
Almost nothing has been done in the last year and some stuff it's just pretty ridiculous (like the low res where you should put the embarrassing stuff they sell for real money).
Most of the BT stuff has been just raped and slaughtered, time is frozen and so and so on.
I hope they we'll get the license revoked as soon as possible.… Expand
Dec 16, 2013Beloved 80s IP being actively destroyed by a cash hungry, incompetent developer... What's sad is spending thousands of dollars on this title nets you far less content than what was available in MW4...
The game, as with most other industry destroying "Free to play" titles is nothing more than a gimmick designed to suck loot from the pockets of dedicated MW fans... This game could have been something great... But as like most other things... When money is the primary motivating factor, quality takes a total ****
Don't support IGP or PGI if you are or ever were a true fan of the Battletech IP. The sooner this sorry excuse for a company sells the IP, the sooner a "chance" of a good developer picking up the IP.… Expand
Dec 15, 2013Whole game development process and especial last Clan grab deal can be described like this :
A drowning PGI will clutch at a straw. PGI and MWO are sinking, it's only time before they say that game development has stopped and servers will be closed in 1 month, probably soon after clans release (if they manage to stay afloat that long).
People responsible for development of this game would fail at designing Minesweeper clone.… Expand
Dec 9, 2013I've been playing MWO for probably 3 months now, and overall I'm perfectly satisfied with it. Yeah, it has glitches. And maybe it's not all it was cracked up to be (I wouldn't know, I wasn't around during Beta). What I DO know is that I find it thoroughly enjoyable to drop in with a bunch of random people, make an impromptu battle plan, and blow some stuff up. I didn't find the learning curve especially steep. Success depends more on learning combat techniques than understanding the upgrades, and that only comes from time and experience. That does indeed require a bit more commitment than one may expect, but it adds an interesting mechanic that prevents a noob from stomping all over everyone with the swipe of a credit card. There are a few weapons that could really use some tweaking (flamers and NARCs mostly, IMO), but by-and-large you'll see a wide array of combos on the field, so apparently it's not so ill-balanced as many claim or we'd all be driving the same setup. Heat is incredibly annoying, but equipment limitations make it more realistic and less an arcade shooter. Mostly, I see a lot of people complaining about a game that DOESN'T COST A DIME if you don't want it to. Not very realistic expectations, if you ask me. You wanna play free, you grind. PGI isn't a charity. Hero Mechs ARE a bit pricey, but I consider that a fair trade for no subscriptions and the in-game cash bonuses the Heroes award. If you're willing to pony up for the extras, you do so knowing full well the current limitations of the game, so again, why all the whining? For a casual gamer such as myself that loves giant mecha, MWO does a fine job covering the bases.… Expand
Dec 5, 2013At its core MechWarrior Online (MWO) is a MMO-FPS and -TPS (you can change perspective at every moment of the match) with very big tactical and strategical component. This means, that high shooting-skills like reactions and awareness will pay off for sure, but also a deep understanding of reasonable mech loadouts (strategy) or right choice of useful combat zones (tactics) gives great benefits. That point makes the biggest difference to its brother in mind: World of Tanks (WoT). MWO shares with this very popular game the FreeToPlay and Anti-PayToWin architecture.
You can get into MWO with instant PvP combat on a trial mech together with 23 other players. The matchmaker tries to balance such a so called 12v12 PuG (randomly merged teams) for a close finish. You can also jump in a battle with a group of 4 (lance) or 12 (company) mates. In that case you will meet similar team structures on the other side. At the moment two game modes are provided: conquest (get resource points out of capturing bases) and assault (kill all opponents or get their base). Further modes are promised since months. But unfulfilled promises by the developer PGI would be another story...
The first look and feel of MWO with a good performance PC is fancy, grounded on CryEnginge3. After some hours the lifeless and indestructible environment, multiple texture errors, not optimized effects or some breakdowns are a pain in your neck.
The unique experience you can get in MWO is the high AND long learning curve, besides the official BattleTech IP. No matter where you veteran come from (WoT, BF, CoD, TF, etc.), there is a long way to go to become a good MechWarrior and this can be addictive. The complexity and interdependency of different weapon mechanics, mech classes, maps, teamwork opportunities, match-up situations and so on need hours of gaming and a high resistance against frustration. Even more because there are no introductions, tutorials or PvE-missions. As a reward for invested time you get a big stock of (necessary) equipment or access to special modules. They provide for example better sensors, visuals or movement and can not be bought with real money right at the start. You have to learn it the hard style, but spectator mode and the grown-up and international community helps significantly.
MWO is a recommendation, if you played the previous games of the series with fun. Same for other Robo-Mechas-Tank-sims or -shooters as Heavy Gear, Steel Battalion, Front Mission Evolved, World of Tanks, Hawken and so on. Supporters of BattleTech in general, its table top game or other spin offs can take a look on it, but will have a rough start. At least it is the right choice for (semi-)competitive-PvP-gamers, which dislike the idea of respawn and appreciate substantial outcome from the needed combination of different skills and team play.
Thus its hard difficulty MWO is NOT the right choice for newbies. Even more as the high priced, so called Hero-Mechs will not deliver any high value in challenge. They are just "bling-bling" chassis. So keep your money and save it for mech-bays or premium time, to minimize the grind.
Summing all this up: 6 points out of 10 for me. And that means PGI sadly did not add strength or popularity to BattleTech or MechWarrior as a concept of SciFi yet. There are still some additions promised by PGI, but I would not bet on something substantial in the next months...… Expand
Nov 23, 2013Shameful display.. A game that makes me look back at MW4 and Microsoft running the franchise back then, with keener eye.
MWO tries to go back to MW3 with it's more oldschool control system, which actually works quite well. It is smooth and natural, gives you the feel of a powerful warmachine that weights tons. This small dose of MW3 nostalgia though is completely ruined by staggering everlasting work in progress status of the game that doesn't seem to change since CLOSED BETA! You got to keep an eye on momentum of your 100 ton machine to steer it effectively? Well, a pity, because there is still no collision detection, although the engine is fully capable of it. Running though trees and shoulder rubbing buildings 100 mph, circrling around heavies with lighter mechs, bouncing off walls imposes no penalties, no damage... and they can't fix it for almost a year now! Horrible lag problems and abysmal optimization. The game works awfully on decent duo-cores. Even though you may be way above minimal requirements, got stuff from recommended shelf, but unfortunately your CPU is not a quad, you may experience graphic and system lag on lowest settings and ridiculous resolution! Devs promised to address this issue as soon as possible... for almost a year! again! Each month, each patch a loyal fanbase is promised a fix for their issues, but instead we get another premium mech. Map choice is rather pathetic, maps being tiny enough not to get lost but unfortunately offering very little but few same old paths, forcing use of same tactics.
It's almost like Piranha Games is not interested in fixing issues their customers are expecting on purpose, waiting till they upgrade their rigs or just leave the game instead of making the game playable for quite large userbase, which they sadly loose.
Another awful thing is the economy system copy-pasted from World of Tanks, which honestly is the worst choice possible... but copying cheep ideas seems be the theme around PG, so, that's not entirely unexpected. In the end we are left with system that rewards for group victory over personal contribution. Meaning, even though you did a lot to help your team, you killed majority of the enemy forces, but still your team lost, you are awarded less then you'd earn in a game you did little-to-nothing but with your team actually winning the match in the end. This is a big turn down to any player that values what little time they can spare and would rather be rewarded accordingly to their skill and input rather than "randomity" of matchfinder. Like in world of Tanks when you loose your mech you are locked for the rest of the match, allowing you only to spectate, what leads to situations where most games and matches are won after couple minutes. If you loose three mechs on the very start, either due to bad luck or whatever the factor, your team can pretty much quit or sit and get killed. Of course that is a broad generalization, but i'm writing it in regard to new ideas presented in Warthunder game, where you can take couple of machines you got in your garage. You loose one, you can take 3 more, but of different class and role. This is not present in MWO, meaning, if you lost a scout, you lost your eyes and ecm protection for good. Lose of Long range support may mean the same thing. Long story short it's easy for team tactics to crumble and no way to reward players contribution accordingly.
MWO also features one of worst experience and pilot development system. In order to improve some sills of your pilot on a specific mech, you need to grind xp, obviously, but in order to progress to higher tier feats, you need to grind skills and feats on 3 other variants of same mech model! Meaning if you got your cataphract and you got it geared and ready for combat, you will literarly need to buy 3 other variants, grind them, sell them so you can progress in the one original you have! And that is no cheep deal, believe me! Buying those useless mechs is a wallet smashing deed, and Piranha Games couldn't be more obvious with "you MUST give us money" attitude than that, also pushing out new premium mechs every month instead of FIXING THEIR DAMN GAME, is just a sign of an awful dev. It is a shame that there are games out there, vehicle based MMO battlesims, that are aware of how to treat their clients.… Expand
Nov 19, 2013Single Player/Multi Player (1/2) (If the single player is better than the multiplayer, review this section as if it had no multplayer) (If the multiplayer is better than the multiplayer, review this section as if it had no single player) Gameplay (2/2) Visuals/Story (2/2) (If the visuals are better than the story, review this section as if it had no story) (If the story is better than the visuals, review this section as if the visuals didn’t matter)
(Review this section only on Accessibility if the game has no longevity) (Review this section only on longevity if the game isn’t accessible)
This is a guideline for how to properly review games. Many reviewers like to get a “feel” for a game, and arbitrarily give a game a score that they believe it deserves. This results in wildly different scores between different reviewers, and vastly different scores between similar games. This guideline addresses these problems and scores games fairly and consistently. This guideline also gives scores that are usually similar to the metacritic score.
The review score is based out of 10 points. There are no “half” or 0.5 increments. It is impossible to have a score above 10 or below 0. The review score will change as the game gets new dlc, drops in price, or if more secrets are found through the game increasing its appeal.
The scoring is split into 6 sections. The first five sections can add a possible 2 points to the final score. The first 5 sections are Single Player/Multi Player, Gameplay, Visuals/Story, Accessibility/Longevity, and Pricing.
Notice that 3 of these sections have two parts. These particular sections will be scored based on the stronger part of the game of the two. For example, if a game has a lousy single player campaign, but an excellent multiplayer component, that section will be based solely on the multiplayer as if the single player did not exist. This allows games to be based on their own merits, as many unnecessary features are shoehorned into video games by publishers to reach a “feature quota”. Games that excel in both areas of a section don’t receive should be noted in the written review, but cannot increase the score past 2 in that section. However, it can be taken into account in the final section
The final section can add 1, add 0, or subtract 1 to the final score. This final section is the “wildcard” section. This section is for how the reviewer “feels” about the game, but limits this only to this section, rather than the entire 10 point review. This section can include any positive or negative point that was not covered in the previous 5 sections.… Expand
Nov 13, 2013Game registry is purposely nerfed if you have a high elo.
Moderators delete any talk on the forum about anything faulting the developers.
Matchmaker is broken.
Maps and mech selection are boring and repetitive due to design flaws.
Game itself is repetitive.
I was so excited for this... but now it's just
Nov 11, 2013This game can be explained easily WOT with mech warrior skin. Except with terrible collisions. You will find yourself getting stuck and unable to move near small objects and many objects you can walk inside of and shoot through.... This game feels like its barely reached alpha. They cranked out Pay 2 Play pilot skills only available for real cash and no way F2P people can get them or anything like them. Its not small things too one gives a radar that shows all enemies in a huge radius so people that an pay money will never be surprised attacked again. Seriously nothing new and is worst than WOT… Expand
Nov 10, 2013A mediocre installment in the Mechwarrior franchise the game has a somewhat solid mechanical base but is plague by a parade of technical and balancing issues that have lead to a largely divided and caustic player base. Failed promises, truly ponderous update progress and poor developer communication has only driven a larger wedge between the already bitter community and the developers. The new player experience is incredibly unforgiving with little in the way of game play explanations and hidden unexplained mechanics like ghost heat cripple new players without telling them why. The combat at it's core is interesting and the customization creates a lot of interesting options, but the weapon balance and hit registration problems force a small variety of cookie cutter builds on the player base in order to remain effective. Try the game if you're a die hard mech fan but don't bother sinking any money into it since you're only going to regret it once the realization of the state of the game and community sink in.… Expand
Nov 9, 2013This game does not deliver on its promise. High points are good graphics and great sound engineering. The rest is decidedly underwhelming.
The game modes are boring and uninspired. The BattleTech rules are badly represented; typical problems that have plagued MechWarrior games in the past and which the developers swore to avoid have reappeared: weapon boating, power creep, heavier is better.
Technical issues keep throwing things back. Standard features such as lag compensation (in a real-time multiplayer shooter, of all things) took months to even appear on the roadmap. In fact, it was once an official position that lag compensation in particular was not strictly neccessary for a game of this type.
Generally, the developers do not seem to know what they are doing.… Expand
Nov 6, 2013One of the things I look into before getting into an mmo is not only how good the game looks, but also how it plays as well as how the community is. I got to say after scrutinizing the forums and learning the history of the game, which strongly reminds me of my days back in SWG, I decided to put this game down, if it is of any indication, there isnt much future left in it. Gameplay wise, it extremely generic with certain options completely dominating the game, the 3rd person view feels akward and completly ruins whatever immersion there is to be had when facing an enemy team of exactly the same suits. Definetly not newbie friendly. If there was any potential to this tittle, its been completly thorn from it.… Expand
Nov 4, 2013Where to start with the biggest letdown in my gaming career? It's hard to describe succinctly how far this game missed the mark, but I'll attempt to tell the story of MWO's development as honestly as I can.
During the early summer last year, the developers of MWO (Piranha Games PGI) offered a Founder's Program to help fund the game and bring in tons of fans to test and provide feedback on the game. There was a grand vision of where the game was going, it was all documented in the dev blogs, and this is the vision that was used to market the game at this stage.
In closed beta at this time (I bought in to the beta through the founder's program) the game was essentially a giant trainwreck. The UI was completely awful, and often crashed your game. Actually, nearly everything crashed your game at this point. The netcode was awful, the game only had one mode, and there was a very thin selection of mechs and maps. However, this was the point where the game most closely resembled a proper mechwarrior game, and it's only gone downhill from this point.
I should also point out, that at this point there were many strong positives about the game. It was gorgeous, for starters, and the combat pacing was excellent. It was still early in development, so the massive problems could be overlooked, as there was a shining gem underneath all of that.
Over the nearly year and a half since I joined the beta, I've watched poor decision after poor decision completely erode that shining gem underneath into a dull, bland, rock. All the while repeatedly missing development milestones, and completely forgetting about or willfully ignoring the original vision that the game was sold on.
A small list of features this game was supposed have had months ago:
-New game modes (dropship mode, and asymmetrical assault)
-Lobbies (yes, an online game that doesn't have lobbies of any kind)
-In-game VOIP (yes, an online game that doesn't have in-game voice of any kind)
-Community Warfare (the large overarching meta-game system)
-Mech tonnage limits
-Functional bases with turrets and capture mechanics
-Role Warfare (systems and skills that made each mech class and role unique and useful this in particular has completely failed and this doesn't exist in the game at all. You either go fast and cap bases, or carry lots of guns)
And now, here we are at launch day. The game has seen exactly 0 of the promised features actually make it into the game. Instead, PGI utterly ignored its community and wasted immense amounts of time developing features that no one wanted, like P2W consumables and third-person view.
So, in closing MWO is an incomplete mess of a game that has changed very very little from its closed beta state.
Graphics: 5/10 This was a 8/10 before, but continued 'optimizations' have steadily ruined this department. Mech scaling to the environment has always felt completely off as well.
Sound: 9/10 Quite good, actually... a highlight.
Music: 0/10 Lol, they forgot this feature.
Presentation: 2/10 The UI is extremely bad, dense, and non-intuitive
Gameplay: 1/10 Perpetually bad decision making has taken what was once an extremely fun stompy robot game and made it a bland twitch shooter. There are only two game modes, which are both extremely simple and essentially 'stand in square or kill everyone.' The game is horribly imbalanced, and is extremely unfriendly to newbies. You can expect to have your face used as a bullet sponge when you first attempt to play, as the matchmaker will happily drop you against grizzled veterans that have mechs far far more powerful than what you start with.
This game gets a 3/10 overall for nostalgia reasons only, I had tons of fun playing this once upon a time. The current game is a shallow grindfest, and looks like that is going to continue for a very long time. I can't say don't try it, as it is free, but do not be tempted to spend money, you will later regret it.
PS I will likely be banned from the game for this review. Yes... PGI actually are complete dicks like that.
Update: I've been banned (and received zero notification of it). Thanks for proving my point!… Expand
Oct 28, 2013This game is heaps of fun if you've played the previous Mechwarrior games and are a long-time fan of the Battletech stuff, like I am. But I'll start with the bad. Promised development and improvements are slow in coming. They introduced 3rd person. Some of the chat from other players is atrocious, and there will always be a few idiots that think friendly fire is somehow fun. The ELO system is not based on individual skill.
But here's what's really special about it:
1. It's not pay-to-win! Plenty of other games out there are, but I do much better in the mechs I got without spending any money on than I do with the special ones that cost me $.
2. There's no respawning. It matters to you and your team if you get destroyed in the match. Most games respawn, so it doesn't matter like it would in real life. Immersion is king!
3. Deeeeep customisation.
4. There is some form of teamwork, albeit it handicapped by PUGs and voice-chat options that aren't particularly user-friendly.
5. There's nothing random in the gameplay, winning or losing is entirely based on skill and teamwork.
All that together makes it a very engaging, complex and awesomely fun shooter.
But if you're not a fan of the whole battletech thing and aren't used to the previous Mechwarrior games (which came out over a decade ago) you can expect a tough time in your early days. Stick at it though, it's fun already and will get better.… Expand
Oct 27, 2013This game showed to so much promise, however between the complete lack of any real progress, and the producers repeatedly going back on their word (after cashing in on the investment players made in the game based off false promises) it is drifting farther and farther way from mechwarrior, not to mention good game design and balance. Do Not Recommend.
Oct 25, 2013If they hadn't promised people that kickstarted their project one thing and did the other, this would just be a half developed game by a C grade game dev. But as it stands, this is a dishonest arrogant and inept developer. Every month the cash shop has new items and expands consistently. And the game, after a year and a half, pretty much stays the same. I could elaborate, but the various review sites and player blogs have documented this game devs failings well, no need to repeat. Famous IP, made into a turkey, go Star citizen folks!… Expand
Oct 24, 2013I was very excited to try the game out, waited a night for it to download, and was sorely disappointed after playing a few matches. The game kept tossing me up against grizzled veterans, and squaddies who hated anybody who wasn't very good. I have to say, the community for this game is horrible when it comes to new players. I'm not saying it's a bad game, if you had friends or knew what you were doing it'd probably be fun, the sounds are nice, the graphics are okay, but really none of that makes a difference when you're being murdered horribly.… Expand
Oct 23, 2013For players who are not familiar with battletech don't have any idea about what's going on here. No content, I mean no story or campaign. So why can you chose a faction?! Whats this faction for?! No background info about this game, no missions only multiplayer.
Oct 20, 2013First it's free! Second, it's giant stompy mechs! Solid game play and mech customizations make this a fun online game to play with a good selection of maps. Many fans have been involved during its Beta release and some of that drama has bled into the toxic reviews. Seriously, rating one or even zero for a free working game that they admittedly say was fun is not helpful. Again, you don't need money to play the game, but it helps to raise experience and money for gear if you had a premium account. Also, it does help if you game with others in the MechWarrior Online community. I admit it's much more fun to Shoot, Move and Communicate with friends. I believe that's the core of the game, having fun with friends in an online gaming community.… Expand
Oct 18, 2013While a promising category and basis for a game (giant robots!) the game continues to struggle through buggy, repetitive and frustrating gameplay. Although excelling graphically and allowing for a wide range of customizations for your "mech," the failure of the developing company to properly balance the game and resolve recurring bugs has turned its fanbase rabid.
Throughout its beta phase, the game was plagued with horrible weapon balancing, frequent disconnects, and other issues. Many of these problems remain in current gameplay, even after a year of "beta" testing and feedback. Moreover, and much more painful, is the game's team balancing system. This system, which is ineffective if not totally absent, pits new players against highly experienced players, places light mechs against assault and heavy mechs, and allows teams using outside communications to play against groups comprised of individuals without coordination. The results are predictable... a game which is either repetitive and unskilled, or incredibly frustrating.
At this point, the developers are almost solely focused on the release of new mech variants, as this is where the game generates its pay-2-win revenue. It is becoming more apparent that the soul of the game has departed the developers, and the game is devolving into a shameless cash-grab.
Unless you truly intend to play it for free, avoid the game. While the game is promising, it cannot currently deliver. Until these issues are fixed, it is likely your money is best spent elsewhere.… Expand
Oct 18, 2013Came into this game excited to play a Mechwarrior title without an ending. It's a lot of things to take in as a new player. The learning curve is steep, but rewarding once you get the hang of it. There's a training mode to test out how your mech moves. Other then that your throw into wolves as it were. Every match your thrown into has multiple people usually groups of four or more who are using outside game voice chat programs. As a new player you will die often, pretty much all the time as your team gets rolled by people using voice chat. There is no separate queues for solo playing. And they have no plan to add an in-game voice chat. So if your new, and want to play the game solo queuing for these matches you will grow frustrated and quit.… Expand
Oct 14, 2013I have really enjoyed watching this game develop. In fact, just about the only thing that bugs me about it is the players who are never satisfied with anything the devs do.
As of this posting, the weapons are balanced fairly well, Elo matchmaking is in, they are about to release (tomorrow, actually) a wave of new mechs, the game is stable, and I really enjoy the time I spend playing it.
While I would have preferred a standard boxed game for my Mechwarrior experience, I understand that F2P is the reality for the industry now whether or not I like it, and I do approve of how the devs have decided to monetize the game. It is not in any way pay2win, it is pay2avoidsomegrind. While that bothers some people, I feel like there really isn't much grind because I enjoy the gameplay. If you want to collect mechs like you would collect pokemon, then yes, you're going to be frustrated unless you lay out some cash. However, if you don't have to have everything immediately and enjoy a tactic shooter, you really owe it to yourself to try this game.
And for the love of Pete, read the FAQs and newbie section of the forums for play tips first. I will say that they need better tutorials for those who have not played previous Mechwarrior games before and who don't look at the key mapping.… Expand
Oct 14, 2013Mechwarrior online is great game with few unfinished features what have got part of playerbase upsed but core gameplay is awesome. Many balance problems are fixed and game is nowadays much fun. Game has steep learning curve but time spent wont be wasted. Hope that more players would get interesred this mechmayhem. See you on battlefield.
Oct 12, 2013This game is not fun. It's bad. The graphics are bad. The sound is bad. The netcode is terrible. The developers are terrible. The community is terrible. Try it at your own risk.
At this point the game exists as nothing more than a way to take advantage of fanboys and white knights who will spend money on anything with Battletech or Mechwarrior on it.
Oct 11, 2013This is a very fun free to play game about huge battlemechs, the F2P business-model is fair and the game runs smoothly. There's certainly enough maps and they are adding more, only 2 gamemodes though. the game has good in-depth mech customization as well.
Oct 10, 2013I am a Legendary Founder and have played since closed beta. I was sold on the ideas of a great MechWarrior action game (which this game isn't) with planetary battles/factions via Community Warfare (which they've hardly even started work on even though the game is released).
The truth of things is that PGI got screwed over by their publisher IGP. A massive amount of cash was raised by Founders to fund this game, but sadly a lot of it was funnelled away from MechWarrior Online and into other IGP projects. This left PGI in hopelessly over their heads having made promises they couldn't keep.
The result is a game that has a mediocre online mech gift shop and no gameplay depth whatsoever. It takes mindless grinds to a whole new level. There are so many missing features; there's not even a basic lobby to organise and socialise.
I have to say in closing that the way the players have been treated has been a demonstration in how not to run a community.… Expand
Oct 10, 2013I was putting together a review that would best describe my opinion for this game, when i ran across an article on GameFront. The article is called, "A Cautionary Tale: The Rage of the Mechwarrior Online Community." It's written very intelligently. I would recommend that everyone read it so they can understand why there are so many negative opinions of this game as a whole. I won't include a link since that's not kosher here.. but u can plug the quoted phrase into any search engine and find it.
People may gripe that it deserves a better review. They'll say, "People are complaining about the publisher. The game is good." Now, think about this. This game was crowd funded. Normally, whoever makes a game to sell pays for it up front. They try to craft something that will sell the most games. WIth crowd funding, they take your money first. They get it because they promise you a game that you will want and tell you everything that you want to hear. Shouldn't they feel obligated to deliver on those promises?
Now, if you wanted your house painted blue, paid someone to paint it blue, and came home to a red house, wouldn't you be the least bit angry? Wouldn't you at least question why and expect a straight answer? Of course they offer to repaint it. The next day, however, your house is green. They convince you that you wanted it green. Green is better then blue. They promised you blue, but after taking your money, you end up with green. Would you be happy? Something to think about.
I didn't think it could get any worse, but sadly I can't drop the score any lower. I have been encountering swarms of bugs and game freezes since my review posted that have been present since early game. I had believed these to be fixed, but they seem to re-emerge with each new patch. I will be putting together a review soon of the "new player experience." in it, you'll see exactly how much time and effort are required to get to a playable state (ie "not" overheating constantly and dying early). it will include detailed stats at each milestone, unlike pgi.. that just makes up numbers based on "theoretical averages" to blow smoke up your butt. yes, real numbers.… Expand
Oct 10, 2013dev's disrespect community. features promised not delivered. F2P but P2W. gameplay is so buggy youll miss 90% of your shots. match-making encourages steamrolling or spamming 1 weapon type. litterly 2 or 3 maps that i remember. 2 game modes only 1 mode makes it so that light mecs are KIND OF useful only their mostly garbage. despite looking like complete ass and using directx9 it still has the audacity to drop below 60 FPS.
steer clear. this game is F2P and P2W rolled into one.… Expand
Oct 5, 2013This game has its good points and bad points but it's also still under continuing development. It might be a while before we start seeing things such as the strategic element but they do have a roadmap and have given it much thought.
I'd say this game is alright and has potential. Certainly worth checking in to see how it progresses but not something I would hold my breath over since the progress is a touch on the slow side. Still, I enjoy it from time to time.… Expand
Oct 4, 2013A fun and nostalgic game, but PGI made a huge mistake by bringing the game out of beta in the state that it's in. If they had waited until the release of UI 2.0, more game modes, and more polish, I believe the game would have been better at the official release, and subsequently, the reviews would have been better. The game needs a good bit of work to be great.
Sep 30, 2013Thank you PGI for lying to all the old fans and making this horribly unbalanced game. Thank you PGI for making this game look worse than a game that came out in 2006 Thank you PGI for making a game so bad it dooms the possibility of more mechwarrior games. Thank you PGI for making MWO 11/10 "SRS" 5 stars "JIDF" it's a hit. "IGN" inb4 I get banned from MWO when the devs read these reviews.… Expand
Sep 29, 2013An adequate mech shooter marred by a polarised and toxic community, indifferent developers and what appears to be a main screen/menu that's comprised of 80% ads for overpriced in-game items.
It is recommended that prospective players first approach the forums for information regarding C-Bill spending, as earnings after the initial cadet bonus are abruptly castrated not constructing the first owned mech properly can make or break a new user's experience.
If you're here purely for stompy-shooty, then this is your game. If you seek depth and the big vision of interplanetary mech warfare initially foisted on the wary long-time players by the dubious developers, look elsewhere.
Teamspeak is a must.… Expand
Sep 28, 2013This game lacks any kind of repeatability after about the first week of playing. There are limited maps, even less game modes and the match making has to be one of the worst around. There are many times you will have 10 game losing streaks as your grouped against pre made groups. The game feels more like it should be in closed beta than an official release.
Sep 28, 2013i had expected a lot more from it. Or maybe i had false expectations to begin with. Mechwarrior or rather BattleTech for me is a mixture between RP or character development and tactical mech combat. But what i get here is instanced arenas where players incidentally fight in mechs.
And the worst part is i do not even recognize most mechs. They are so far from the pen & paper sourcebook material that some of them are unrecognizable.
I also found that they do not have sufficient individual characteristics and that the combat was much MUCH more twitch based than having the feeling of piloting some dozens of tons of steel. To me it felt more like one of those "mecha" games where you are in powerarmor and not like you are in a huge robot.
on the technical side well, i guess it is the engine decision. this engine does not run well on my system, which is entirely my problem though and i do not blame the game for it but for such a small-scale game it does not even look very good.
the sounds are OK but lack a lot of "punch", the effects are only standard.
but all that would be irrelevant if the game did not feel like some generic 1st person shooter.
When it comes to multiplayer i came to the conclusion that the MTX mechwarrior 4 mercs title, which is a free download, is more fun even if by todays standards it looks hideous.
conclusion: when you regret the download on a "free to play title", something is wrong, or it simply was not "your type of game".
i like battletech but i wish we d rather get a real mechwarrior 5 than a free to play arena shooter.… Expand
Sep 28, 2013The best thing I can say about MWO is it didn't cause my computer to catch fire, so that is something.
Mechs are woefully unbalances as are teams and entire matches. The overwhelming majority of matches I have played in end in a one sided slaughter. The learning curve is brutal as is the grind to obtain anything worth stomping around in.
Only two modes, well one really, since "conquest" just ends up being a slaughter fest most of the time anyway.
The number of boards is pathetic.
River City. River City Night.
Frozen City. Frozen City Night.
Come one, changing the lighting or adding snow is your idea of a new map?
The last, best hope is for this to die quickly and the IP picked up by someone competent.… Expand
Sep 28, 2013Want a no BS review without the flowers and rainbows being shot out of someones butt at you? Here you go:
The game isn't done, not by a long range missile shot. It has bugs, and not just a few, many. Worse, quite a few have been in the game for half a YEAR and have not been fixed. MORE worse, they haven't even been acknowledged and aren't even given an ETA on being fixed. Much MORE worse, they've outright lied to the players and the people who invested REAL eash to fund the game. They made FIVE MILLION DOLLARS since July of last year, but did they hire some serious programers or coders? Nope, kept it all in-house and just kept riding the "Battletech" fame that OTHER developers, writers and games have built over the last 30 years.
You want lots of promises with no serious game play, sign up, but bring your own lube because they don't use any when they stick it to you.… Expand
Sep 28, 2013As a Battletech fan, I've played almost all and every game around the franchise, and this iteration brought up a lot of hype back in the day. It was 10 years after the last known official mechwarrior game, and the community was hungry,
Unfortunately, the game developed by Piranha games is, at launch day, nothing more than a beta. The progress over the last year has been minimum to none, and, while it's got a huge potential, more and more features are either delayed or treated the opposite way Piranha sold me a year and a half ago.
I think I'll wait for the next iteration.… Expand
Sep 28, 2013I'm a huge fan of the Mechwarrior and Battletech franchises. I've played them since the original tabletop game came out. It is a universe filled with rich heritage, intricate balance, and unique customization.
When MW:O was announced I bought the biggest Founder's package they offered, to wholeheartedly offer my support. They promised a continuation of the series that I'd come to know and love, offering giant stompy mech goodness.
The promise was one of more faction-driven combat on a galactic scale, with highly customizable battlemechs in unprecedented detail.
We started with a game that started with a strong foundation and very tried-and-true mechanics, easily tweaked to fit the engine that PGI selected to support it.
As testing progressed, the game has gotten less glitchy, which is a testament to their work, but the balance has been continuously destroyed. Without any real effect of tonnage in-game, and with broken weapon stats, a 35 ton Spider can easily expect to not only destroy hundred-ton assault mechs like the Atlas, but in fact, to deal far more damage.
The developer ignores constructive feedback and suggestion, while using draconian measures to hide any hint of dissatisfaction or negativity in the forums.
When I emailed the developers a few weeks ago, I mentioned that a lot of the game's Founders were very upset with the fact that the game was such a departure from other Mechwarrior games. I specifically asked why so many seemingly random changes were being implemented, and why more of the old Battletech rules were not being utilized. I also asked about aspects of the game that are absent, and unlikely to be added even if Community Warfare is ever implemented.
Here is a part of the reply I got, unedited, and in context.
"I feed on the hostility myself as a long time gamer I've come to realize that there will ALWAYS be some who are unhappy for whatever reason. I'm personally enjoying this game quite a bit, although I think it helps that while I played the old MechWarrior games, I wouldn't call myself a huge fan I don't feel like I need to relive my childhood, etc. still that's just my own thoughts."
Why are people that don't even care for the old MechWarrior games in charge of producing this one?
As it stands, the game is now just a mindless grind, with total disregard for any reason to be fighting. Twelve mechs at a time batter themselves to bits ineffectually, while their pilots spend more money on a doomed and badly done version of this once-amazing franchise.
I still love MechWarrior, but MWO isn't it. I've hung up my cooling vest until further notice, folks. Maybe the next generation of this game will be better.… Expand
Sep 27, 2013I am seeing wide variation in ratings here on Metacritic for Mechwarrior Online. I think I might know why.
TWO different games are bing rated at the same time, causing lots of confusion:
1. There is a First Person Shooter using Mechs that is being rated. It is basically the Beta of MWO,
which has been somewhat dumbed-down for less knowledgeable players.
2. There is the PROMISED MMO with new UI 2.0, Community Warfare, longterm objectives, AI
opponents, etc which has been delayed again and again.
The original Founders paid big money into this game for the development of a rich, in depth BattleTech
Experience. Instead, apparently most of the money they paid was used to develop another game! The
title of which has Mechwarrior in it, but it is "tactics".
So basically, I believe the developers have discovered that diehard BattleTech Fans will pay for a mere
ghost of the game they were promised, and can be milked for more and more money with more and more
Empty promises. After a year in open beta, this game has not progressed, it has gone backwards! Many
supporters have walked away in anger, having figured out they were suckered by an immoral game company. But that is OK! The developers changed this FPS so that with 3rd person view, even the simplest gamer can play it, or so they hope. Then they can milk a new crowd of BattleTech fans for more
Money before the game DIES.......
So you will continue to see 10 and 9 ratings, which are actually for the simple Deathmatch game with Mechs. And you will continue to see Zeroes and ones and twos from the people who are angry it is not what was promised and what they PAID for!
Maybe the developers should change the name of the game to Mechwarrior Deathmatch Online, and be honest for a change? And let another company develop a real BattleTech Game?… Expand
Sep 27, 2013The game is tolerable for short periods, recurring video problems as well as crashing issues make the game a iffy proposition if you're going to play with friends.
The dev's are a huge weak point for this product and as of launch the games design pillars are almost all missing. The devs take months to do simple things for instance it generally takes a full month to review a weapon tweak, sometimes it's more than that leaving the flavor of the month to last entire seasons, the summer of the sniper meta for instance. Map bugs are also long lasting, and map design is weak in general.
These same devs are reprtedly are working hard on the key design pillars but after almost a year in open beta they’re still missing and given their shady history of lying about what will and won’t be in the game you have to wonder if any of the stated design pillars will ever make it into the product.
In the end I’d say to go to other products which have a more constant history of telling the truth, as well as more stable products and more professional developers.
Just don't do it man, you'd be better off with any of the other possible F2P games… Expand
Sep 26, 2013While it would be white-washing to say that the game is without issues (as all new games are), it is clear from reading many of the reviews that a lot of the people who are slagging the game are disenfranchised individuals who take their dislike of a certain design feature or the unavailability of a feature at launch to mean that they can (and should) call the game garbage. This is, unfortunately, very characteristic of the entitled attitude that many gamers have.
Shortly before launch, two things happened; a feature that the developers had stated quite some time ago would not be used was in fact put in game (and as of writing this is no longer in any meaningful matches), and Community Warfare (the 'meat and bones') was post-poned. Both were disappointing issues, but understandable on both counts; regarding the first issue of the suddenly-implanted feature, design paradigms change for any product, and it was still Beta; at actual launch, the feature was relegated to 'casual only' games, not true competition. Regarding post-poning Community Warfare, it's only to be expected that a F2P title with a limited budget may have to push a feature back awhile.
Neither occurrence should be reason to slag the game in horrible ways, but the spite of internet warriors is indeed legendary. I would urge anyone who comes here for advice on what to play to take a good, hard look at what one is reading, and if it looks hyper-negative, to disregard it.
Fundamentally, MW:O is a Free-to-Play title. Free. As in it does not cost most players a single penny. If this game had been released and/or published by a company like Blizzard-Activision, Microsoft, or even Electronic Arts, I would say that a number of criticisms were fair. As it is, it is a free-to-play title from a minor studio who built a functional and stable game in only two years on a very small budget. Their entire development team wouldn't even fill a single section at any major developer. Perspective goes a long, long way towards affecting how one should see things, and I think that some people simple forget to put this company and this title in said perspective.
Game Play: Superb. The game has been stable for most players for quite a long time. There are terrain bugs at times, and as with any PvP game, weapons and equipment balance is always in flux; if there are complaints about PvP in games like World of Warcraft, with a decade of development under its belt and billions of dollars to command, it should surprise nobody that MW:O has its own issues. For the most part, though, the game plays well; it feels like you are in command of a giant machine, not like you are some faceless solider in a Call of Duty clone.
Graphics: Rendered on the Cry Engine, the game looks as one would expect very, very good. DX11 is in the pipe for testing and should only increase the magnitude of what we already see, which is fluid movement, gorgeous lighting, beautifully rendered 'mechs, and a very 'to scale' impression of combat.
Sound: The effects are brilliant, and especially with headphones or with a good surround-sound system, one feels very much like one is in the of a machine. The only failing is the lack of music. Trailers for the game and trailers for special 'money only' BattleMechs have featured some fantastic music, all original compositions, but none is in the game... yet.
Overall: If you're a BattleTech or MechWarrior fan, this is worth it. If you're a Call of Duty-style gamer, this is not your kind of game. If you want to play something that requires team-work, something that is far (FAR) more complex and challenging that your standard FPS game, and something that has a bright future in the form of dynamic and meaningful results from battles, MW:O is a great title to get onboard with. It's not all here yet, but it's getting there.… Expand
Sep 26, 2013I used to be involved in the competitive scene in this game. I played in RHOD and watched the metagame stall and finally lost total interest after a competitive scene dominated by one type of mech was allowed to exist for 6+ months. PGI has continuously failed to deliver and created overwrought and expensive ideas where simple number balancing would have worked. I also participated in the first and only ever community involvement event, the Design a Trial Heavy contest. I chose literally the worst chassis of the worst mech and fit it out with a configuration I had never driven before and won.
This game is garbage and most of the development and publishing companies are blind to the issues with the game. Rust in Pieces 'Mechwarrior Online.
Sep 26, 2013Contrary to what some of the haters have been about the Devs not paying any attention to what the players want, this is one of the few games around where the Devs take time to read the forums and actually answer there and act on what is being said. That said you cannot please every one, but for the haters who think that the devs are deaf, try World of Tanks where the player base is ignored totally by the Dev Team and where the players will die of a heart attack if there ever is a reply from one of the Devs.… Expand
Sep 26, 2013Mechwarrior Online is a decent game. The concept is solid and has potential, but at the moment there is not much content (and a lot of grinding to make up for it) and there is an inexcusable technical problem which makes small fast mechs unreasonably difficult to hit. Aside from this, the matches are fun. In organized groups, there is considerable depth to the gameplay as well.
Sep 26, 2013Been playing since very early on and its been nothing but one crushing disappointment after another, and from that early on its been clear the only objective here is to milk money as fast as possible and to hell with what people are actually interested in playing
Sep 26, 2013After a 10 year Hiatus Mechwarrior explodes once again on to the PC and this time its a F2P title. At its heart MWO captures perfectly mech combat and customisation that are the hallmarks of this franchise. It has excellent graphics and sound, and battles are tense affairs where you try to eek out the best from your build and stomp to glory. In this respect MWO delivers and as a F2P title you would be mad to pass it up. That said the game is not flawless. The new player experience can be somewhat unforgiving, especially for those new to piloting mechs. PGI the games developers have recently added a movement tutorial and plan to follow this up with further instruction. However the match maker can often pitch green players against veterans and this may cause frustration. At its heart though MWO is a team based game and provided that new players stick with their team there should be no reason they wont achieve victory.
MWO also seems a rather fair F2P title without any P2W components. The free starter mechs are outclassed by player custom jobs, but all the content (with exception to Hero Mechs which offer an earnings bonus and different weapon configs) is accessible without spending a penny. Currently the meta game consists of earning C-Bills (money) and XP (Experience Points) in order to upgrade your mechs and expand your pilot skills. The mech customisation is excellent and features most of the options found in the board game. The pilot skills are generic for each type of mech chassis and whilst offering good bonuses could do with some more variation and specialisation.
In fact this cycle of battles and customisation and unlocks is incredibly addictive helped in no small way by the multilayered combat. This truely is a "Thinking Mans Shooter" and whist it can seem overwhelming to the new player the level of depth here provides for a rich and deep combat experiance that transends any other shooter this reviewer has played.
And whist that is MWO's strongest assest it is also its biggest shortcomming. Eventually you realise that the endless cycles of battles are all there is to the game. Whilst you may be having a literal blast playing them, MWO really does need other layers to round it out. Thankfully PGI are aware of this and from the get go have been promising players a much vaunted "Community Warfare" mode. In short this allows players to join factions from the game universe and engage in a ongoing campaign for the known galaxy. Unfortuantley despite the best laid plans of the devs CW isnt yet in the game. Which is a shame because with it MWO could easily rank up there as one of the best PC games of all time, let alone the best F2P title. The devs have stated that it is comming soon and infact plan to make a detailed announcement providing further details at their launch party. CW will also be preceeded my a much needed upgrade to the UI, which, whilst doing its job certainly could do with more polish.
So that said should you bother with MWO and will you be playing it in 2 months time? The answer is a unreserved YES! At its core as a action shooter it is fantastic. It requires the player to make a choice as to their prefered playstlye and then challenges them to create a mech which can undertake that role most effectively. Provided the player does some research outside the game (such as the MWO forums) the sheer range of options can be breathaking. This in itself is reason enough to get this on your hardrive. However when CW arrives it has the potential to boost this title into the stratosphere. However without that feature and given the current poor UI and unforgiving new player experiance I have to award MWO 8/10. Once CW and UI2 drop though....get ready for something special.… Expand
Sep 25, 2013A game of great potential, but persistently hampered by increasingly slow development times. There is a strong admitance that the game is not complete, but as it has been in beta for over two years, nobody should be holding their breath for the features that initially suckered us in to the game 2 years ago. I can certainly say that if Mechwarrior Online can sustain itself long enough to truly full-fill its original design document, then it will be a great game to play, one worthy of proper competitive gaming. But I anticipate that this time is going to be at least another year or two, and it might not have hat long left to live.… Expand
Sep 25, 2013Decent attempt at a multiplayer game but it lacks focus and has been plagued with problems by developers not having a clear vision. Communications issues along with the developers insulting those who crowd-funded the game to make it possible are also an issue. The graphics are not bad but there are UI issues and constant promises of "improvements are on the way" but little has been made on that front for the past 7 months. Controls are also not bad, but mechanics in the game have caused more issues and the solutions have not resolved the problems those issues represented. The game is just not good and should have been managed better by a more experienced staff..… Expand
Sep 25, 2013Fun game which, as so many online games, starts out somewhat limited, but with a solid core, and then evolves over time into something much larger.
It's developers listen to the community and make a great effort to try and balance all the different weapons that the game allows for, and they come up with some interesting solutions that force players to think about making balanced loadouts instead of just running out there with as many of the same powerful weapon that you can fit.
This has, however, made a bunch of people very angry. Don't ask me why, because I find it interesting that a fight doesn't end instantly because some guy had so much firepower in a single click that he could kill anything with one hit.
If you're into a tank/robot style ranged weapons combat game, this might be for you. You can buy more mechs in the game and upgrade them with weapons, engines, armor and so on, with resources you earn in matches. With real money you can buy "Mech Credits" that you can use to buy premium time, which boosts your XP and resource gain, or you can use it to buy mechs, including "hero" and "champion" mechs, which are only buyable with those, these work by either boosting XP or resource gain, but are otherwise the same as the ones you can with your earned resource. Additionally you can use the MC to buy skins, colors and decoration for your mechs, which allows for some pretty cool customization.
Development is ongoing and a bunch of very cool looking features are on the way in the next 6 months. It's still a relatively new game, development wise, and you will find problems and issues sticking out, but the fun mech combat is second to none and it looks to be getting better.
And hey, it's free. Play some hours, if you don't like it, at least you didn't spend any unrefundable money!
Another great thing is that you can play just a week a month and then whenver you come back, two patches will have been round and there'll be a new mech, maybe a new map, a bunch of fixes and other things changed! I love reading update notes for my games, and it means you always have something to look forward to … Expand
Sep 25, 2013The game play isn't so bad, but in a F2P you need to trust the team. This game was released with a place holder UI, no meta game to speak of. It has limited replay s there are only 2 very similar modes and few maps. It may get better but the issues have been known for a while but are you willing to take that chance?
Sep 25, 2013When this game launched it was full of home and wonder. It promised a lot and then, delivered very little. Launching with no major update, literally just removing the beta tag, the game still has only 2 game modes. Has a unexplained and very complicated system for heat if you have more than 2 types of a weapon, and new players have no way of knowing about this system. The long announced Community Warfare and heralded UI 2.0 have been "in the works" since closed beta and theres still no promise of them ever happening.
To make matters worse the lead developers have sadly, very publicly stated that community feedback doesn't matter. A game that won't listen to feed back? Its solution to EVERYTHING is complicated hidden systems instead of simple balancing? Stay far far far away from this game.… Expand
Sep 25, 2013Mechanically and visually, MechWarrior Online is at it heart a 10 point rating game. However MWO is supposed to be a MMO but does not have any of the features that it should have as a launched title. It lacks in game VOIP and an overall immersive experience linking all the endless coliseum style matches.
That being said, a majority of the negative reviews can be attributed to poor community management at MWO. Other games have their detractors but have very little effect on the game reviews, in PGI's case with MWO, they are experiencing a backlash from their poor PR skills. As far back as Oct 2012 in closed beta, there were many vocal members pointing out all of the shortfalls which are being highlighted now by professional reviewers such as poor initial game experience and a longer grinding experience compared to other games. PGI unfortunately belittled them through posts on their forums, twitter, FB and in podcasts (yeah it wasn't just a one time careless comment) essentially telling them to off. While some of the negative reviews can be taken word for word, others are simply a vindictive backlash. There are plans to introduce a more immersive experience but no solid dates have been given.… Expand
Sep 25, 2013This is mechwarrior so this is a good game !!
But on the other hand we have no game room, no matchmaking, no way to balance different mech (no battle value, no tonnage), no visibility of your level (ELO, rating..)
In itself the game is not bad, but the way we play it is terrible "Click the play button and hope you be in a good game". 30% of time you get pug stomped, 30% of time you pug stomp, 30% of time you get a 900 tons vs 700 tons battles, 10% of time you get a good game.
12vs12 game are terrible, and are forced, it's impossible to challenge an enemy lance to do a 4vs4 vs friend....heck we don't even have chatroom "Do you really want chat rooms?" ;)
It's a good game but very far from completion, it's only alive because of the battletech fan base.… Expand
Sep 25, 2013As of Sept 2013, core gameplay (that is, the actual fighting part) is solid, immersive, and fun. Promised meta based around that gameplay (factions, lobbies, etc) has been delayed and is definitely lacking. However, IF you take the game that we have at this minute, discounting what may or may not be added in the future, you still have a great experience.
Sep 25, 2013Been playing the oldskool MechWarrior games and when saw the BattleTech universe would get a new revival I jumped the wagon on MWO as a Founder. The game has a lot of promise and graphics pleasing most of us. Gameplay and balance is WIP still, more features on the way. There are some things here and there that irritate, like too much of FPS feel of the game instead of simulator feel many waited for. But still offers a lot of fun and exciting battles from novice to veteran players.
MWO has potential and a lot of promise. There has not been a single BattleTech game in over a decade. Now we got one. Jump in the Mechwarrior!… Expand
Sep 24, 2013I learned of this game just before its supposed "launch" which did not really add or change anything. The game can still be considered to be in beta. It's not complete. As I played a few matches and read the forums, I started to learn about how disgruntled and jaded the loyal customers are. It would appear that PGI have been doing some very shady and questionable acts, such as ignoring (or outright deleting) perfectly legitimate questions and criticism on a certain type of topic called "Ask the Devs".
Another significant event was when the third person camera view was implemented without the consent of almost the entire playerbase. It ended up with PGI's CEO, Russ Bullock apologizing for their incompetence. The problem was never entirely resolved as development in general is remarkably slow.
I haven't spent a single dime on this game because it's such a liability. And might I add, the currency purchasable with real money is very expensive. Also, you can buy "Hero" mechs, which are basically variants of regular mechs with unique hardpoints. While it isn't straight-up pay to win, it's certainly a feature impossible to acquire using regular in-game currency. Paintjobs are also only acquired using real money currency.… Expand
Sep 24, 2013I have been playing for almost a year now, and I have to say, I am honestly hooked. This is my first foray into the Mechwarrior universe and I'm glad I started here. It's an absolute thrill to get into the of a 20+ ton robot, roll out with your lancemates, and blow other mechs up with impunity. The graphics are gorgeous, the customization is great, and the sound quality is superb (when you fire a ballistic weapon, you KNOW you're firing something with a gigantic slug coming out of the barrel). As a casual player, I can spend hours playing and just lose track of time.
Unfortunately, many of the negative scores you find here are the hardcore crowd who think they got cheated and are now trying to "teach PGI a lesson". If it's not their way, then it's no way. Could PGI be more transparent, yes. However, since they are a smaller company than say Blizzard or CCP, development takes a bit longer. If you listen you the No Guts No Galaxy podcast, they have the devs on a lot, and have had 2 in-depth interviews with the devs about upcoming features. The hardcore crowd will get what they want, it'll just take more time with a smaller staff to get it implemented. In the meantime, if you're looking to have a ton (or several tons) of casual Mechwarrior action, this is your place.
See you on the battlefield, Mechwarrior!… Expand
Sep 24, 2013I have never seen such utter contempt from developers poor communication, censorship (with threats of bans for speaking negatively about the game) and outright lying to the player base. I don't know what happened over the last years, but whoever is calling the shots now needs to be fired. What started as the promising multi-player Mechwarrior with community warfare has turned into a grinding, repetitive shooter. Instead of spending the last year working on game mechanics the development team has been more concerned about churning out new mechs so they are able to provide another new hero mech.
There is no purpose to play other than to get another mech that you probably don't need because only a handful of mechs are even useful. I wish the developers would go back and look at the concepts that they sold to us in the closed beta phase (information warfare, role warfare, etc.)
There is no point to play anything but an assault mech with the 'flavor of the week' weapon that is given advantage by their broken method of weapon balancing (trial and error) where they randomly pick a weapon and tweak the values and wait for the tears on the forum to start.
if you want to try the game go ahead but beware before you spend your hard earned money. This game may not be around this time next year with the direction the Dev team is taking it.… Expand
Sep 24, 2013Where to start? The list of broken promises, unattained potentials, and disregard to the paid customer base is so long that I am forced to review in generalities. Not because I want to, but because there is little other choice... who has that much time?
MechWarrior Online has such potential, but it has been unfulfilled for the year plus that I have been beta-testing and playing.
They are not shy about asking for cash payments, but...
We are still stuck with only two play modes, both of which are strangely similar.
We still have only 8 maps (and some of them are merely night/day versions of pre-existing maps).
The long promised and undelivered Community Warfare is still a far away dream. That is, unless you count the ongoing state of war between the community and the devs taking place in the forums.
Game play itself goes through massive balance swings, with vastly overpowered weapons meeting draconian nerfs, only to be replaced with new, more egregious game balance issues... all in an endless cycle.
We seem to be going nowhere fast.
As much as I (and many others) paid out early on in the development cycle, I really wish I could be more optimistic, but it seems like we were suckered with empty promises and the ole vaporware switcheroo.
Still, I hold out hope. I hate to spend that sort of cash and expend so much effort for a game that even the devs don't take seriously any longer.
Pray for MechWarrior Online. It may yet recover from its glacial development and anemic offerings... with divine intervention.… Expand
Sep 24, 2013I would almost never give a game a single star, but this game promised so much, and at first it appeared to deliver on said promises. Now we're a year and a half later and we have very little to show for it. If I could refund my initial investment in this game I would in a heartbeat.
Sep 24, 2013The art is the only redeeming thing about this game. Gameplay has only 2 modes which may as well be the same. Both are 12v12 (which makes death happen very fast, and you only get one life per match), and the only difference is one mode has 5 bases to capture and the other has 2. The UI is terrible, with extra clicks needed all over the place where only 1 could have been used. The biggest problem is probably the developers. They promise one thing (no 3rd person view ever!) then do the opposite. They promise features (community warfare, clans, and a new UI have all been coming "soon" for about a year and a half now) and then never deliver. They implemented ghost heat: a confusing, convoluted system to solve a problem that not only doesn't solve the problem it was intended for, but also ruins lots of things that weren't problems. perhaps worst of all is that ghost heat is hidden in the game and you would never know about it unless you read the forums. They regularly troll legitimate questions on twitter. They edit users' posts on the forums to make it look like they're saying something positive when they weren't.… Expand
Sep 24, 2013If you are a huge mechwarrior/battletech fan... then give it a go after all it's free to play. Otherwise stay clear while the game has it's merits: it looks good, the weapons look and feel good, the mechs look fantastic, it has some irredeemable major flaws:
The gameplay is very stale and repeatable, there is nothing but an endless grind towards... nothing really? If you are not the "must collect them all" type, then I don't really know what can you play for all the mechs are available from the start (providing you grind or buy them with real cash),
there are just a few maps, with most of them being so small that the game turns into a slaughter immediately.
But worst of all are the hit-detection issues, which mean that sometimes you just don't deal damage when you hit someone this is just plain inexcusable in a game in 2013.… Expand
Sep 24, 2013This game had potential early on. It has steadily gone down hill. It is not a simulator anymore... it has become an arcade shooter with mechs.
You might find it fun for a little while but it grows old very quickly.
The game has no content to speak of... one game mode (they claim two but realistically they have Deathmatch with 1 base... or deathmatch with several bases)
In addition, the addition of 3pv into the game removed its simulator qualities and the Devs have consistently "dumbed down" the game.
This game is designed for consoles in my opinion... that is all it is... a console shooter game.… Expand
Sep 24, 2013I love the BattleTech franchise and this game lets me play the mechs I love. Not only that, but it is essentially a first person shooter without the twitch game play. Having your feet pointed in one direction while you are looking sharply to the side is a very different game mechanic from the other FPS out there. There is the whole leveling up to gain a more useful mech, the ability to edit the mech within limits. The game is free to play, free to download. You can pay money for extras, but you can also play for free and while it will be more difficult, it will be playable and you can be competitive. This game still has alot of room to grow to, with more mechs, maps, modes, etc.
Yeah, the developers haven't done everything the community asks for the way it's asked for. But the game is very playable. If something is overpowering they tweak it. It may not happen instantly, but they work on it. There isn't much for tutorials, so a new player without a BattleTech background or friends that already play, will have a steep learning curve.
I would like it have more maps and more game modes. I can't wait for the new user interface for the MechLab, because while the current one is usable, it could be better.
Bottom line though, I liked it so much, I built an entire computer to run it.… Expand
Sep 23, 2013I have played this game since closed beta. I can honestly say it was a better game 2 years ago than it is today. Before it had mech collisions, better graphics, and none of the new terrible maps. It didn't have any of the strange game mechanics that break the game like ECM, Seismic sensors, ghost heat, and 3pv. Very disappointed in this game, it had great promise. Its just another cash grab f2p now, and its clear that's all it'll ever be.… Expand
Sep 23, 2013For all of those trying to figure out if the upset customers are simply entitled trolls who are posting bad reviews out of unwarranted anger, I can summarise things simply.
Play the game for free. Enjoy what you can. The experience itself is fine if you're not paying a cent.
However, do not, AT ANY TIME, spend a cent on the basis of any promises the developers make. These devs lie through their teeth, and have no respect for their customers whatsoever.
If you would like concrete examples, here are a few I'll share.
One of the key promises made back when they were soliciting funds from fans back a year ago was 'No third person'. There is now third person in the game.
Breaking a promise is bad enough, but perhaps it is fair to argue that things change, and sometimes developers don't have a choice in the matter.
However, the developers of this game proceeded to lie twice. First they said 'sorry, we need third person in this game to cater to a bigger audience. But we will have both first person and third person only queues, so you'll all be happy'.
There are no seperate queues.
When confronted with this lie, they were ONLY pushed into action because several players finally had enough and asked for refunds which they were forced to give, because they had no other option: They had marketed and sold a product that turned out to be something it wasn't, and they risked legal action otherwise.
Their official written response was also a passive-aggressive half apology which basically blamed the fans for being too demanding. You can find the release for yourself on the official forums.
Players who were upset at various aspects of the game wanted to meet up in a sychronised fashion to show how many of them were upset at various decisions that had been made in the game.
The response by the devs was 'We should shut the servers down just as they're meeting up, just to f*** with them'.
This wasn't just a rare case of a dev having a bad day.
Devs have also responded to legitimate concerns voiced in very reasonable tones by members, with sarcastic remarks about the player being in a very vocal minority. The most famous term used by a dev towards a player when asked if they were concerned about unhappy players was 'you're on an island'.
Game stability and reliability is non-existent. Patches can render your game unplayable while 'premium time' you paid for continues to count down. However technical support just shrugs its shoulds and says there's nothing they can do. Bugs of this nature include: Black screen on game launch, crash to desktop, massive rubber banding not involving your ISP, bugged weapons that one shot enemies, etc.
And just today, in a hilarious inability to see their hypocricy, they've labelled 'premium time' basically a paid for booster that you can buy to increase the rewards you get for playing the game, a 'must have'. This, after trumpeting far and wide that this game was not Pay 2 Win.
Play for free, it is fun. Don't pay a cent for their promises, they're not worth that.… Expand
Sep 23, 2013The core gameplay of mechwarrior: online is fun. There are plenty of mechs with about seven about to be released. The main problem with the game is it still doesn't feel done, the new ui 2.0 is absent and the game still needs optimization. Balancing is much better than what it was months ago to the point where you don't need to have any very particular loadout to be successful *cough cough 3 ppc gauss*… Expand
Sep 23, 2013This game has a lot of potential and is entirely ruined by Pay to Win. I recommend new players not to play this game at all. It takes time to figure out how you want to play and a lot of time is spent grinding up barely enough ingame currency to customise your mech. Without a customised mech, you will lose flat out and have zero fun. The grind takes at least 250 mins of game time to earn ingame currency to buy a single pathetic light mech. We have not even factored in the cost of changing out weaponry, upgrading etc. If you want to play a heavier mech or medium mech, we're talking upwards of 1000 mins of game time just to get one Heavy/Assault mech built up. Buying with real money is INSANELY expensive. Just avoid this game, the older Mechwarrior games are more fun and cheaper.… Expand
Sep 23, 2013This is a bad game. Hit detection is bad. Graphics are bad. Gameplay is bad.
* Hits fail to register nearly 50% of the time.
* This is a CryEngine3 game and it looks like something from 2004.
* The Gameplay is TERRIBLE. The weapons make no sense, the heat system makes no sense, the game modes are repetitive, boring, pointless. The grind is worse than any other F2P game I've ever attempted.
* The netcode is ATROCIOUS. EVER SINGLE MATCH at least 1, 2, sometimes 3 people get disconnected.
* The community is dying off rapidly. Time to find matches is getting longer. All the public Teamspeaks are ghost towns.
It's simply an utterly garbage game. There are literally no redeeming qualities whatsoever that I can see.
I give it a 0/10 now, because there's not even anyone to log into the game with anymore and make fun of how terrible it is.… Expand
Sep 23, 2013One has to wonder where all the money extracted from beta version micro-transactions went. It certainly didn't go into improving this game. MechWarrior was always a blend of RPG, strategy, and action. But this "reboot" of the series seems to think that MechWarrior fans don't like all that pesky "depth" or "tactics." What the fans want, the developers believe, is to pay hundreds and hundreds of dollars on micro-transactions so they can pay to win. Do you love the feeling of blasting "newbs" in their underpowered "free" mechs, using your expensive pay-to-win mech? Then, this is the game for you!… Expand
Sep 23, 2013One of the worst examples of no-communication with the communitiy so far. Developers did not only ignore the will of the communitiy, but went straight against it. Sad to see just how fast a premium IP like Mechwarrior can be driven against the wall by developers. Will not play ever again. Even registered for refund to drive my point home. First time ever i did something like that in my 25 year gaming career.… Expand
Sep 22, 2013While the gameplay is pretty good and catchy, there is nothing more to look for in this game, especially is you are a Battletech fan, as in this case you are not the target audience, by the words of developers. The game is never going to be what it promised to be from the start a thought-out mech simulator in BT universe, with role warfare and massive faction war over the star map with hundreds of planets, all made in CryEngine3. The game lacks not only stunning graphics promised in the early days and comparable at least to Crysis 1 on CryEngine1, it lacks any vital gameplay content, except for grinding over and over on the setting of just 6 maps and 2 game modes. And it is more than clear, that it is not going to change in the nearest decades, we'll just have some more mechs to grind in, and a couple more maps to grind on. Well, this game is not even a simulator! Not only the development of sim features ceased a long time ago, some of already implemented features were cut from the game in the early stages, since then several casual features have been imported to make the game more arcade. And the devs are doing it right in the eyes of protesting community, ignoring the core fans over and over again.
Verdict: MWO had some potential and is still playable and even enjoyable in small doses, but it is already clear that destination of this game is, sadly, nowhere. Lack of interesting content, grinding, horrible UI, unwanted innovations, cancellation of promised features, bugs, pretty high prices and lots of disregard to community.
Have to wait another 10 years for someone competent to pick up the franchise and give us a proper MechWarrior game.… Expand
Sep 17, 2013This has literally been the worst experience I have ever had with a game in development or during launch. The game is not complete and the developers disrespect the community. The game was kind of fun and challenging for a while, but the state of the game has steadily gone down hill since march