Mission: Humanity Image
Metascore
27

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 5 Critics What's this?

User Score
6.1

Mixed or average reviews- based on 13 Ratings

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • Summary: There really is nothing good and nothing redeeming about Mission: Humanity.
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 5
  3. Negative: 5 out of 5
  1. There are no aggressiveness levels for me to set in M:H, and I've got to walk the troops all over the frigging planet, probably took me 25 minutes, to find this schmuck and off him. Definitely not the taste you want to leave in my mouth the day before I'm writing your review.
  2. Unfortunately, the unbalanced squad-combat and wrap-around maps are not enough to pull this one away from the Pit of Despair.
  3. There's only one or two releases per year which manage to get just nearly every element in a game completely and utterly wrong.
  4. Because of its ugly graphics, bad sound, faulty artificial intelligence, and extremely dull gameplay, it winds up crashing to the ground like some ill-fated hydrogen blimp.
  5. Completely without substance and fails to match even the primordial games from the DOS era.
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 9
  2. Negative: 3 out of 9
  1. Roy
    Mar 12, 2006
    10
    I got the orginal in my time the game was very fun so for me it was a good game.
  2. Matt
    Apr 22, 2006
    10
    this was one of the hardest games that i have ever played and the tutorial took me less than 3 minutes to find the guy. they tell you right this was one of the hardest games that i have ever played and the tutorial took me less than 3 minutes to find the guy. they tell you right where you should look for him. Expand
  3. StalkeR
    May 10, 2006
    10
    I think it's very intresting game, you ask "why?", I tell you. You can travel from planet to planet, research techs, and graphics are I think it's very intresting game, you ask "why?", I tell you. You can travel from planet to planet, research techs, and graphics are cool! this not WH40K:DoW, but for isometric graphics it's realy cool! Expand
  4. EricM.
    Apr 10, 2006
    9
    It lacked graphics and information!! Although I prefer racing games... I found this game is still a challenge because there is no It lacked graphics and information!! Although I prefer racing games... I found this game is still a challenge because there is no walkthrough, therefore I have been unable to successfully complete the game! Expand
  5. Worf
    Jan 10, 2005
    5
    Actually, this game isn't all that bad, if you have nothing better to do and have mastered all the other games you have.
  6. Ben
    Aug 8, 2004
    1
    I wouldn't accept this if it was free. It could have been a decent StarCraft clone, but the graphics, soundtrack, pathfinding... well... I wouldn't accept this if it was free. It could have been a decent StarCraft clone, but the graphics, soundtrack, pathfinding... well... everything-there are NO words to describe it. And don't even think about playing it to find out. Expand
  7. Jay
    Jun 9, 2007
    1
    This game is one of the worst ive ever seen... it would've been fine if they'd released it in 95 instead of 2000 but come on! They This game is one of the worst ive ever seen... it would've been fine if they'd released it in 95 instead of 2000 but come on! They took all their sounds from command and conquer and they ai is as dumb as dirt... IE if the enemy is attacking one side of the building they soldiers on the other side wont realize it or if your attacking enemy barracks with four men one enemy will come out and mow your men down before they even notice him.... it ruins it..... Expand

See all 9 User Reviews