Metascore
57

Mixed or average reviews - based on 18 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 18
  2. Negative: 5 out of 18
  1. There's no shortage of World War II strategy games on the market, and Moscow to Berlin does nothing good to stand out from the pack.
  2. In order to create a challenge in spite of the idiotic artificial “intelligence,” units are extraordinarily weak and feature dubiously sub-par pathfinding. Units will get jammed together in cramped areas before buckling and dying after only two to three hits.
  3. As it stands, it's for series aficionados only, which judging from the multiplayer boards would be all ten of you.
  4. Why degrade the virtual Eastern Front of WW II into less than a mediocre experience?
  5. It's such a gnarled mass of poor pacing, non-intuitive interface hassles, and second-rate graphics that it really has no hope of being anything more than a bargain-bin purchase.
User Score
tbd

No user score yet- Awaiting 2 more ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 1
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 1
  3. Negative: 0 out of 1
  1. PeterP.
    May 12, 2007
    7
    Almost the same game as battle of the Bulge, only new missions and some new (Russian) models... that's it! Oh, and a few bugs Almost the same game as battle of the Bulge, only new missions and some new (Russian) models... that's it! Oh, and a few bugs unfortunately! But I love these Monte Christo RTS-games! A shame that the game never came out overhere! Had a lot of problems getting it! Full Review »