No Man's Land PC
Metascore
70 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 12 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 12
  2. Mixed: 6 out of 12
  3. Negative: 0 out of 12
view
per page
  1. PC Gameworld
    82
    There is little to dislike about No Man's Land, and much to love, despite the multitude of multiplayer bugs.
  2. Computer Games Magazine
    80
    There's a great primal vibe that somehow makes you enjoy every minute the six sides spend at each other's throats. [Jan 2004, p.82]
    All this publication's reviews
  3. Times Online
    80
    Graphics are fresh, with plenty of animation and the multiplayer mode offers some new alternatives to the "deathmatch" and "capture the hill" scenarios.
  4. Gamer's Hell
    78
    Questionable unit AI prevents No Man’s Land from swimming in the same pool as the big boys.
  5. IGN
    76
    The mechanics feel a bit stale and it's just too frustrating trying to keep your units together. There also doesn't seem to be much historical accuracy throughout the game, which is unusual for a period strategy game.
  6. GameSpy
    75
    While No Man's Land may not offer the depth of Microsoft/Ensemble's "Age of"... games, it's still a good value, with lots of gameplay and eye candy along the way.
  7. GameZone
    74
    While there is nothing that compelling about it, it's a decent enough diversion into light strategy, and may fit the bill for someone looking for a strategy game that focuses on American history.
  8. Adrenaline Vault
    70
    Has some fairly innovative features like counter upgrades, paid assassins that can be turned against you for the right price, and the innovative Railroad Building Race mode. Despite these creative turns, however, it’s still a triumphantly average experience.
  9. PC Format
    68
    The unique graphics engine much vaunted by CDV sadly enables little innovation in the rendering of 3D effects, and only the magical powers offer something a little different, which is telling – overall the emphasis is on over-the-top adventure, rather than realistic recreation of history.
  10. GamerFeed
    60
    I can't help but be a bit bored by this formula as I've seen it in countless other titles.
  11. GameSpot
    59
    It falls victim to lackluster gameplay, thus preventing it from being recommendable to RTS fans.
  12. Computer Gaming World
    50
    An unabashed retread of concepts that were innovative four years ago. Absolutely no attempt has been made to refine or expand anything.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
7.4 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 5 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 1 out of 2
  1. JoelB.
    9
    its good very good gameplay and realistic
  2. TylerH.
    0
    It's as boring as a wet paper bag on a cold in December.
See all user reviews »