User Score
4.5 out of 10

Generally unfavorable- based on 12 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 12
  2. Negative: 6 out of 12

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. AnonymousMC
    Oct 1, 2004
    8
    If you judge this game fair, it has earned a 75 at least. It's kind of an arcade, console-like game, but hey: You wanna tell me that Cod and that stuff is "realistic" ? :D This game is fun, it motivates you with the collection of "trophies". Give it a try, you might like it !
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. Jay
    Jul 5, 2004
    10
    Truly amazing, fantastic graphics and gameplay.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. KyleF.
    Sep 11, 2004
    0
    An absolute pile of crap.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. Agent
    Sep 22, 2004
    0
    This game is a total waste of money!!! terrible graphics, terrible AI, terrible level design, terrible controls and not playable online.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. SteveT.
    Sep 20, 2004
    1
    Terrible controls, cartoonish combat, atrocious level design. Dodge this draft.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. TheBeast
    Sep 6, 2004
    5
    I think a good opportunity has been missed with this game.The game is far too linear, and although the graphics are good they cannot compare with Far Cry.I think if this game had the graphics of Far Cry and the gameplay of Fist Alpha and the plot of this game then they would be onto a winner but as it stands i feel a little bit short changed. i completed the game very quickly and felt that i had not really been tested. Also there is no way to play online which in this day and age of broadband is unforgiveable. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. [Anonymous]
    Sep 14, 2004
    5
    Truly disappointed by this game. Really anticipated a unique experience because of the media leading up to its release. General freedom to act and explore in this game is very limited - they should have licenced the Crytec engine. Graphics are likewize outdated -even older engines generate better graphics. Gameplay is again hopeless! Even purchasing an older Conflict series game is recommended compared to this. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. Ups2006smith
    Mar 31, 2006
    0
    If you took a rocket ship to the Planet of Bad Games and then found the country on that planet where all the really Bad Games were and then found the capital city in that country where the really Crappiest Games existed and then found the shop in that city which sold the absolute worst games ever, I still think you wouldn't find a crappier game than Shellshock Nam '67. This game stinks! I can only assume that Eidos were suffering from shellshock when they released this ugly, useless title. Controls? Forget it it! Game play? Non-existant! Graphics? Garbage! Audio? Embarrassing! Enemy AI? What enemy AI? Cut scenes? Gratuitous filth! Arrrgghhhh! I hate this crap so much! Now I must get it off my PC immediately! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. Nov 12, 2011
    1
    I think I can quote other user's review, because it's the best description of what I think about this game: "Terrible controls, cartoonish combat, atrocious level design. Dodge this draft.
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 20 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 20
  2. Negative: 6 out of 20
  1. It fails in my eyes as an innovative title that people will find themselves wanting to pick up in the face of "Doom 3" and the impending "Half-Life 2."
  2. You cannot kill your fellow US soldiers...why? We’re not saying that it’s a good move to blast your support into oblivion, but it would be a consequence to taking a gung-ho, guns blaring approach.
  3. Shellshock doesn’t amount to much more than six or seven hours of gameplay. It’s over almost as soon as it began which, depending on how much you paid for it, might be a good thing.