- Publisher: Electronic Arts
- Release Date: Nov 15, 2007
User Score
4.1
out of 10
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 75 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 19 out of 75
-
Mixed: 10 out of 75
-
Negative: 46 out of 75
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Jan 20, 20134
-
Jan 27, 20121
-
Aug 28, 20110Sucks beyond imagination. You'd expect a great thing when SimCity and The Sims and combined, but instead, you get a total mis-match. Terrible game-play and overall a forgettable experience.
-
Dec 21, 20104They destroyed the SC serie! All the conception of zones ( industrial zone, commercial zone etc) the conception of canalisation and energy network... all destroyed. That was a terrible experience. why change something that was awesome?? WHY?!
-
JonasHøibergFeb 10, 20083
-
-
DraganZ.Jan 25, 20084
-
-
BrianJan 17, 20084As a big fan of the Sim City series of games, I was very disappointed in Societies. I hope this is just a one off and they return to the original.
-
-
JopsJan 9, 20082Where is Maxis!? The life and soul have been ripped out of this game. Only the cosmetics have improved. Instead of being a governor, you're now a town planner with no political decisions to make, like taxes and laws. Its just been simplified for children like Settlers was. Hopefully its a one off.
-
-
AndrewW.Dec 21, 20070This game is an abomination, and is nothing like the SimCity series at all. It's far too easy, the interface is cluttered and the game just plain sucks. It's shovelware aimed to cash in on the SimCity brand.
-
-
BillJ.Dec 3, 20074
-
-
GlennC.Nov 22, 20072Take everything you know and love about the SimCity series and throw it out the window. Will Wright and Maxis weren't even involved in this game. You don't actually build anything per se. I was disappointed and now continue to play SimCity 4.
-
-
PepxNov 21, 20071
-
-
ChrisC.Nov 21, 20072
-
-
DaveM.Nov 21, 20072My son loved SimCity 4 and was really looking forward to this game, but when he tried it he was so disappointed he cried. I have to agree that this is a huge step back from the earlier SimCity titles, with a lot of bugs thrown in.
-
-
AustinMNov 21, 20074
-
-
TimbobH.Nov 20, 20073EA dumbs down and destroys yet another strategy franchise. This should not be associated with the SIMCITY series IMO.
-
-
JamesBNov 19, 20073
-
-
TechnichaNov 19, 20073The name is a bit weird, it feels more like Sim Town 2 rather than Sim City Societies. The game is just boring and slow. The creativity meter just doesn't make any sense at all. Game just seems to be aimed toward kiddies. I prefer the good old classic Sim City style.
-
-
AnneT.Nov 18, 20074
-
-
JeffB.Nov 17, 20073Aimless and baffling, with none of the structure or logic of the Simcity games. Very disappointing.
-
-
RobertNov 15, 20071An abuse of the Sim City name, game is horrible, un-optimized, and looks like it was made with graphics from 2003.
-
-
DavidNov 14, 20070
-
-
The newest Sim City differs quite a lot from its predecessors. It concentrates more on the social atmosphere than being a realistic city simulator. Social energies is a fresh idea which works nicely although they’ve simplified the administrative side of the game maybe a little too much. SC: Societies is a nice way to waste time, but you’ll get bored with it at some point because the game starts to repeat itself. [Nov 2007]
-
50Societies doesn't stumble just because "it isn't SimCity". Fresh takes on old concepts should always be welcome. It stumbles because it's a generally unsatisfying patchwork of a game, dragged down by inconsistent gameplay, outdated design and weirdly implemented ideas.
-
70Despite its few slipups, the core of Societies is strong enough -- and the gameplay addictive enough -- that even the stodgiest traditionalist will find something to shout about.