- Publisher: THQ
- Release Date: Mar 20, 2007
User Score
8.3
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 703 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 593 out of 703
-
Mixed: 36 out of 703
-
Negative: 74 out of 703
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SweetKittyJan 29, 20101
-
-
TManApr 3, 20071
-
-
Aug 20, 20111**** story, **** combat, **** graphics, just horrifically boring. The game doesn't explain much to you, there is barely any story line, your time is spent wandering around from pointless quest to pointless quest untill you end up in an area where you are continually losing health from radiation and no idea of where to find a god damn radiation suit.
-
ChrisK.Sep 9, 20073
-
-
JohnnyDMay 30, 20092
-
-
DerickC.Apr 2, 20074
-
-
AlexM.May 6, 20074
-
-
BobP.Mar 22, 20072
-
-
RandyM.Mar 24, 20073I really had my hopes up for this game. When I bought it, I was really excited to start playing. However, I started playing the game, and found that I was severely mistaken. Terrible sound, graphics, story, missions, everything. Everything is broken. Not to mention this has to be one of the most bug-filled games I've ever played. Complete waste of money....
-
-
MikeMar 25, 20073
-
-
ClosetRamboSep 3, 20070
-
-
RobinZ.Feb 20, 20083
-
-
TruthSoldierMay 8, 20080I bought this game off Steam and it won't run on a brand new system and the developers don't seem to be offering any technical support whatsoever. I think that pretty much says it all!
-
-
SteveHJan 11, 20103
-
-
ZedTJan 5, 20101
-
-
KylebMar 21, 20073
-
-
ShawnC.Mar 23, 20073This is a very disappointing game, especially after the long wait. The graphics are mediocre, the gameplay is tedious (just mission after mission, no ultimate goal) and load times are slow. Maybe it's unfair to compare everything to the incredible fun of a Half-Life 2, but that game is several years old and still thousands of times better than something like this.
-
-
ElliottB.Mar 25, 20073This game was disappointing and hasn't lived up to the promises made during it's eight years of production. Many features that would of been enjoyable were cut, such as vehicles, large loadless environments, and truly dynamic AI.
-
-
KDepApr 23, 20072
-
-
MichaelQ.Apr 10, 20073Stalker: Oblivion Won? Well, it actually did. Elder Scrolls: Oblivion was on the market a year before Stalker, it sported the same open-ended world and adventure, much better graphics and facial animation and, for goodness sake, much fewer bugs. They did not have to issue a hotfix ten days into the game release. For me, Stalker is Elder Scrolls with bugs and a Kalashnikov. Too buggy, too late.
-
-
ErikJan 3, 20094
-
-
PaulJul 29, 20070Constantly respawning enemies is Soooooo LAME! Waste of money! Darnit I spent my birthday money on this!
-
-
imaginerSep 7, 20074What a pity! I love the whole idea... surviving in a radiactive zone. Day and night pass... you are so immersed. You spend ours on a mission to do it just right. And then no reward. Missions appear and disapear as if by magic. Bugs eat this game! such a pity. wouldnt recommend it to anyone. just too frustrating.
-
-
NaffGameDec 25, 20080
-
-
JaredJonesJul 18, 20080
-
-
JamesGJul 5, 20084The environment looks good and is well designed, but the characters lack detail and are all too bland. The weapons are shoddy, and provide a fustrating experience for the player.
Your money is better spent on Crysis (which looks a hell of a lot better considering both games were released in the same year), or, if you're really into the RPG aspect. Deus Ex or the upcoming Deus Ex 3. -
-
ColeDDec 25, 20092
-
-
H.D.Jul 21, 20092This game has nothing big to offer.?f you want throw your money out of the window,buy this thing.Play Fallout 3 if you want a game in this concept.
-
-
AlexNov 5, 20072
-
-
FenryzR.Mar 27, 20073
-
-
B.O.S.Kuro-chanMar 27, 20070This game is 2D, not worth any upgrades to Vista. I would rather drink pig urine that was pooped in by a Gorilla with hemorrhoids than play this game. It is ugly, sounds horrible, has bad controls, horrible gameplay, retarded story line, and, to top it off, it installs about 20 viruses when you boot it up. Avoid this game at all costs.
-
-
TerryD.Apr 17, 20073The theme here is SLOW-PACED. Our hero sort of wonders from zone to zone on various missions that either are or are not essential to the completion of the game. Which is which is unclear at best. There are fights in between with weak weapons that provide about as much excitement as standing in line at a Starbucks at 8 o
-
-
Aug 23, 20100
-
Apr 5, 20123
-
Apr 19, 20134
-
85As a brave experiment in all-action shootery, STALKER has certainly succeeded, though with its dearth of personality and many peculiar foibles, you can't help but wish that the publishers had granted GSC some extra time to polish their creation. Oh, hang on a minute... [Apr 2007, p.56]
-
80It's a warped behemoth from the Ukraine, and one of the scariest games on the PC. Stalker will remind you of all kinds of prior games, and yet it will also defy your expectations. Like the mythological Chernobyl zone it is based upon, this game is a treacherous, darkly beautiful terrain. Not everyone is going to enjoy venturing into the zone, but some of those who do will find what they've been looking for.
-
Littered with a variety of anomalies which can cause the unwary to explode and other delightful stuff, mutant doggies, deserted buildings, weather effects, real-time day/night cycles etc. etc. - it creates a deliciously unique atmosphere.