User Score
7.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 58 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 41 out of 58
-
Mixed: 5 out of 58
-
Negative: 12 out of 58
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Aug 31, 201210Very nice TPS, very tactical and smart, you really should try, it's free ! ;) The content it limited but it will be more in a few time (they are only 4 maps and no armor customisation yet)
-
Sep 7, 201210This is a fantastic free to play game that is the least pay2win f2p ever. The game play is fast and fluid and the guns are varied and fun. With the new arctic pack coming out soon this is game that you must play.
-
Sep 7, 201210
-
Sep 7, 201210
-
Sep 8, 201210
-
Sep 8, 201210Awesome game. No Pay2Win... You need good tactics and skills to win... There gonna be so many new Updates for example a Snow-Map-Mod and new camouflages! GJ Ubisoft
-
Oct 29, 201210
-
Nov 6, 201210Good game, But lags some times because of its peer to peer connections.
Very nice TPS, very tactical and smart, you really should try, it's free ! ;) The content it limited but it will be more in a few time (they are only 4 maps and no armor customisation yet) -
Apr 11, 201310Extremely smart and engaging game, with a higher skillcap and better teamwork mechanics than any other shooters I've played. My only real concern with the title is that it's so completely not pay-to-win that I have no idea how Ubi is going to make any money with this exceptional free-to-play.
-
Feb 13, 201310
-
Apr 1, 201310
-
Sep 7, 20129This is an absolutely superb PvP shooter, with really strong weapon handling/performance, map design and movement and cover mechanics. It is also very well-managed and not pay-to-win. It's not for everybody, though; hardcore, steep learning curve, much humiliation until you get in the groove. Best online shooter, either coop or PvP that I've played in years.
-
Sep 7, 20129
-
Sep 7, 20129Ubisoft has genuinely come up with something different. For anyone who likes tactical shooters this is a very good game with slick controls & spot-on audio. It's a team-based game so lone-wolves need not apply, and when the teams are evenly balanced it's tense and exciting. Hopefully more maps & content will come as they move to full launch.
-
Sep 8, 20129I so like this TPS, many articles of customization and weapons, only 4 maps but the fun is here! (and one more map on the Septembre 12th :D) Can't put a 10 beacause nothing is perfect (like MK16 = sniper...)
-
Sep 8, 20129
-
Oct 27, 20129the game is like ghost recon future soldier but free 2 play .Also graphics, combination in weapons, equipment is fantastic. a very good imitation of ghost recon future solder. one thing i have to say for this game....excellent job GRO team...
-
Nov 5, 20129
-
Dec 31, 20129Its no doubt "UBISOFT" is one of top developers. Its first F2P title from them and its worth playing. Its best TPS ( third person shooter) right now and better then many FPS (first person shooter). And if you havent played yet why are you thinking its FREE!!!!! It aint gona cost you a peny
-
Feb 20, 20139
-
May 16, 20139
-
Sep 7, 20128
-
Sep 8, 20128
-
Sep 1, 20125
-
Apr 14, 20134
-
Oct 21, 20123
-
Mar 21, 20133
-
Dec 30, 20122Mechanics, shooting and everything is fine, but this game has worst matchmaking I've ever seen. No matter if you just started playing you will fight with vets with 500 hours played, clans etc.
-
Feb 10, 20132
-
Sep 8, 20120Game is **** Devs have a hard-on for camping and sniping. Map design? lol oh, you mean the hallways? Learning curve? lol for some...sure. Weapons are extremely imbalanced.
-
Jan 31, 20130
-
Oct 29, 201280Give it a chance and enough time – and Ghost Recon Online will award you with catchy playability. Camera movements and UI polish are heavily needed. [Oct 2012]
-
Oct 24, 201280It's not only one of the best looking free-to-play games, but also one of the most interesting and satisfying. [11/2012, p.67]
-
Oct 14, 201265A well designed game totally let down by the software and structure supporting it. This could have been a must-play. [Nov 2012, p.100]