- Publisher: Atari
- Release Date: Feb 3, 2003
User Score
6.0
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 54 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 28 out of 54
-
Mixed: 8 out of 54
-
Negative: 18 out of 54
Review this game
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Jok`RdeMoFeb 12, 20033Why so BIG weapons? Where tale from first unreal? What happened to that prisoner? In Awakening is just not enough scenario. Just 1st person shooter, which looks like console game, nothing more. After first UNREAL I am very disappointed.
-
-
ParmsS.Feb 12, 20030Nothing at all like its predessesor. It has completely no overlap with the unreal1. Why was such a good game used to market a crap game like unreal2. Very very disappointing.
-
-
Jok`RdeMoFeb 12, 20033Why so BIG weapons? Where tale from first unreal? What happened to that prisoner? In Awakening is just not enough scenario. Just 1st person shooter, which looks like console game, nothing more. After first UNREAL I am very disappointed.
-
-
Jok`RdeMoFeb 12, 20034Why so BIG weapons? Where tale from first unreal? What happened to that prisoner? In Awakening is just not enough scenario. Just 1st person shooter, which looks like console game, nothing more. After first UNREAL I am very disappointed.
-
-
DerekYuSep 27, 20090What a steaming turd. Unskippable cutscenes, obviously scripted events (including forced failed missions). Who the fuck takes 10 bullets with them to a fucking mission where you know you'll be doing sniping? Unnecessary bullshit levels. (One of which completed itself without player intervention) NPCs which I wished I could kill, strangle or otherwise silence. Fuck these guys.
-
-
[Anonymous]Feb 12, 20035Short...short... short.
-
-
LokeszlJun 20, 20059Comment 2005: Bought it few days ago for 5 euro. What is bad about the game? I think it just as good as HL2. About the same gameplay. (No replay value that is.) Unreal 2 underrated, HL2 overrating. HL2 graphics are somewhat better.
-
-
DalekCJun 10, 200910Ignore the bad reviews, this game is very fun. It isn't to difficult and the AI is a bit crap but the briefing and voice is great and the graphics are shiny. Explosions are nice, the weapons aren't so good but they are full of led.
-
-
GlerkH.Mar 4, 20032Short, expensive, pretty to look at, boring and the story was just awful. I finished this game quickly and found few challenges. I like the other games in the series and was addicted to UT but this is not worth the money. Save yourself some money and replay Half-life is my advice. It may not be as pretty but it tops this game in so many ways!
-
-
DanielL.Oct 15, 20039What was so bad about this sequel? It was a bit short bit I kept up high expectations of it for a long time. Every level design(except Na Koja Abad) was great. You guys suck and I don't. How could you not think it was good? A let down from the first Unreal and a little graphics demanding but Unreal2 was a brilliant game. I hope there's an Unreal3 in the near future.
-
-
DraclifFeb 13, 20030
-
-
DraclifFeb 13, 20030
-
-
AndrewH.Feb 23, 20032I have played through a large chunk of this and not really enjoyed any of it, the only motive I have to continue is so I can complete it and get this colossus off my hard drive. If they had to ditch multiplayer to get it this good, I shudder to think what it would have been like otherwise.
-
-
TylerDurdenMar 6, 20033Ok the only good thing is the graphics. The story is lame, the overall game time is very short, at the start there is 3 "helpful" characters, which are really just a decoy and a little softcore porn to get you to stall and think that the game is longer than it is. The objectives are just find a artifact and return it. Very bad game.
-
-
PtacchoMar 31, 20043This is one of the most disappointing games I´ ve played. The visuals look nice, but the level design is so extremely linear and flat that it is almost insulting.
-
-
ChrisS.Aug 7, 20044Graphics are nice. voice acting is very, very bad. gameplay is annoyingly slugish, which is odd considering newer games like painkiller perform quite nicely on my system. overall an uninspiring and sad to say kinda of boring letdown.
-
-
LeighW.May 10, 20069
-
-
LaneT.Feb 22, 20088
-
-
OsckarMar 21, 20087
-
-
JBApr 8, 20083Slow load times after deaths. Caching anyone? Some levels were poorly designed. Got stuck and had to reload in numerous places. Very poor. The original Unreal was better.
-
-
SzilardB.Aug 22, 20083I'd loved it, if i hadn't played Unreal 1 before... nice graphics, but boring gameplay.
-
-
BitBurnApr 21, 20035Well, I must say. I'm disappointed. This game don't even come close to the Unreal 1. Without getting into details I wanna say this: Don't hold high hopes!
-
-
TimH.Jun 24, 200510
-
-
MikeU.May 13, 200810
-
-
Aug 20, 20109
-
Aug 28, 201010loved it on the pc, on xbox looked a bit robotic and graphics werent as good as pc and im sure some bits were missing in places like it was cut short. but overall think it is a good game.
-
Jan 8, 20112
-
Apr 18, 20120This isn't Unreal, Epic just didn't give a crap when they gave the IP to some B-team: without the budget. What you can expect: - Loads of blabla with ashaming animations and visuals. - Real slow gameplay. - No Unreal. + Makes Quake1 look highquality again. + Good nightrest. (you can sleep and play at the same time)
-
Jan 1, 20125
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
73It has the look and polish of a great shooter, but the gameplay of a merely good one. It's also a fairly short game with no multiplayer support to speak of.
-
Only the lack of a rich multi-player section and some odd design decisions keep Unreal 2 from being one of the best FPS's in recent memory.
-
100It speaks like no other game in the genre, loud and with feeling, and tells a story worth telling among all the explosions.