Metascore
39

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 4 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 4
  3. Negative: 4 out of 4
  1. 35
    Stop counting. D-Day came, went and sucked.
  2. Even by 2003 standards, Airborne Troops is an extremely uninspired shooter that borrows endlessly from other World War II games, yet still manages to get almost nothing right. Thus, by 2005 standards, Airborne Troops is a wholly poor effort.
  3. This game is just too unrealistic to make it tick. Airborne Troops manages to get off the ground but it doesn't take long before it crash-lands somewhere behind enemy lines - with nobody bothering to recover it.
  4. The measure of satisfaction achieved in reaching the end of the game is no more significant than with any other middle-of-the-road game.
User Score
8.1

Generally favorable reviews- based on 9 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 6
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 6
  3. Negative: 0 out of 6
  1. KrOnIx
    Dec 26, 2005
    10
    i thought it was a great game 4 its cost alrite grphics nd pritty good sound effects the only fault 4 me is the crosshair rifles r good but colt 45 is jus a dot its hard 2 shoot in the rite direction when ur lookin 4 a lil white dot but other wise i thought it was a sik game,hey it only cost me $15 nd i get 2 kill natzi's so its all good. Full Review »
  2. BrettS.
    May 4, 2005
    7
    Not the best third person action game out there but fun nevertheless.Not a WW2 difficulty hell like CALL OF DUTY,but an easy to pick up game with OK controls and camera.I paid $14 for it new,and it is well worth the money. Full Review »
  3. Zach
    Mar 2, 2005
    10
    Like MGS with its own perks here and there.The reality of the game sets it apart from most other WW2 games.In short, this game is great!