- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
78Alone in the Dark proves that with a little time and patience, a good game can be created from innovative ideas.
-
Flawed, scruffy and inconsistent, but the small moments of magic [do] some way make up for the lack of overall polish. [July 2008, p.64]
-
58Annoyingly its potential is continually squandered by robot mechanics and tedious progression. [Aug 2008, p.104]
-
50An ambitious and in ways progressive survival horror game, whose ambition is hampered by its own numerous flaws. Whether these problems are a result of porting a current-gen title to a last-gen console remains to be seen, but the PS2 edition is very clearly a stripped down version of the impressive 360 game Atari have been displaying.
-
50This version has serious technical and design flaws that make it not much fun to play and are indication of a rushed conversion.
-
Tired, inconsistent and just plain ugly. [Sept 2008, p.78]
-
Alone in the Dark can be played in a day. You can actually skip levels if you get too frustrated, but you can save a lot of frustration by just skipping the game entirely.
-
Worst of all, it never feels even vaguely scary. [Aug 2008, p.102]
-
39Alone in the Dark is ambitious, but it trips, stumbles, and…well, breaks. It's a bad PS2 game and we can't imagine it would get that much better on the PS3.
-
30Nearly every gamplay mechanic fails in one way or another. While the game is functional, Alone in the Dark is a clear case of something that needed to be baked in the oven longer.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2 out of 4
-
Mixed: 0 out of 4
-
Negative: 2 out of 4
-
MaxDeboreck8
-
MaciekO.8
-
AnthonyH.2