Metascore
62

Mixed or average reviews - based on 15 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 15
  2. Negative: 1 out of 15
  1. 30
    The game's abysmal controls and moronic A.I. fail to deliver.
User Score
8.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 10 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 5
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 5
  3. Negative: 1 out of 5
  1. May 21, 2011
    8
    just as its prequels nothing but good to say this game provides a satisfactory story as well as a variety of equipment and missions to keepjust as its prequels nothing but good to say this game provides a satisfactory story as well as a variety of equipment and missions to keep players going Full Review »
  2. CarrieS.
    Feb 6, 2006
    10
    I have been addicted to this game ever since i got it, i even bunk work just to play multiplayer with my mates.
  3. JohnM.
    Nov 28, 2005
    8
    Better than any of the overrated SOCOM games IMO. Looks much better as well, very nice to see some decent textures in a PS2 game for a Better than any of the overrated SOCOM games IMO. Looks much better as well, very nice to see some decent textures in a PS2 game for a change. Controls are no better or worse than other games of this type on consoles, which is to say they should be much better. As always, mouse/kb support would only make sense. There has been absolutely no excuse not to implement support in every PS2 FPS/3rdPS, at least allowing those who appreciate logical controls to use them. And finally, if framerates were considered all that important, 80% of PS2 games would receive below average reviews. At least out of the 300 or so games I've played. You can't blame developers for hardware that was lacking in video RAM (or even texture compression capability which was ancient tech at the time) to such a ludicrous degree from the outset. Full Review »