- Publisher: Universal Interactive
- Release Date: Nov 3, 2002
User Score
3.5
out of 10
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 51 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 10 out of 51
-
Mixed: 6 out of 51
-
Negative: 35 out of 51
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MicahC.Jan 3, 20032I spent the majority of my time with this game waiting for it to load!
-
-
RoboR.Oct 5, 20030
-
-
Oct 21, 20103
-
Sep 22, 20124
-
MarioM.May 2, 20040
-
-
JonathanJ.Oct 6, 20050i used to love spyro for Ps1 but this is not spyro this is horrible some of the worst games beat this by a longshot. DISGRACE
-
-
AprilButteJul 29, 20050Horrible load times, freezes up in key areas making you replay and this is what is good about it! This is not the Spyro we know...it is a crappy Spyro. A spyro for profit not fun...dont buy! Dont play !
-
-
ZacheryAug 5, 20050Sucks But i love the other 123 games of spyro.
-
-
RenaeJan 2, 20034I loved the previous PS1 Spyro games and was under the assumption that PS2 would be bigger and better. What went wrong? Did they sack all the 'Spyro Year of the Dragon' designers and recruit a bunch of kindergarteners. The graphics are ordinary, camera view is annoying, loading times rediculous and the rating I gave is being generous!
-
-
LianaK.Feb 18, 20030
-
-
TamH.Mar 15, 20032Well to tell the truth I wasted my money. The graphics are ok but the game has way to many glicks in it. To many times have we have had to restart the game cause it froze on us. We have the frist three and love them but this one was no good.
-
-
MorganN.Jun 3, 20033I was a huge fan when the series firts came out but take my advive and stick with the originals on PS one. :(
-
-
EmmaG.Jul 6, 20042It was entertaining for a while, but then it was just monotonus. It seems the game makers were using their 'beautiful eye-catching graphics' to make up for this pathetic exuse for a platform game.
-
-
KennyJ.Jul 18, 20061
-
-
JoeBobNov 20, 20020An total and utter embarassment.
-
-
ChrisM.Dec 17, 20021Like Gamespot said "a train wreck of a game" It is unplayable. Horrible, terrible, yuck!
-
-
GlennDec 20, 20020In the first spyro games we would have rated the game a 10. Your new game. Is a joke, over half the area don't even work. I should have burned my $50. it would have been more enjoyable.
-
-
StephR.Mar 29, 20033
-
-
RogerA.Dec 12, 20021
-
-
MargeL.Dec 25, 20024The game has changed, but in a bad way. The camera never matches with the character, making you dizy. The levels are unorganized. There are mini games, which are on levels, but are called levels. Compared to the original, it is horrible.
-
-
AprilM.Dec 29, 20022
-
-
Apr 13, 20114Because Enter The Dragonfly refuses to part ways with its PS one predecessors, it feels overly familiar and overly cliche. Pros: Impressive graphics, lavish colors, and reasonable controls. Cons: All too simple and familiar gameplay, excruciatingly long load screens, and a lack of depth in imagination.
-
Nov 10, 20110
-
Feb 5, 20124This game is fun and feels like a spyro game, but due to the long loading screens, very poor framerate, and overall a rushed feeling in most of the levels, makes it lose the magic that made you love the first 3
-
May 4, 20124
-
Dec 27, 20124
-
Nov 22, 20120This is one of the worst games I have ever played with Superman 64 and Sonic Genesis. This game is basically incomplete. The frame rate, story, game play, and voice acting is terrible. The graphics are decent for 2002 but that's it. NEVER PLAY THIS GAME!
-
Apr 10, 20131
-
There really isnt anything that separates it from other Spyro games. Actually in a lot of ways the PS1 games are much more enjoyable and original.
-
The graphics are nothing to be proud of, as they seem very similar to what we were presented with on the PS one not too long ago, and nothing in terms of the gameplay or style has changed a bit or improved upon in any way shape or form.
-
60Simply a decent been-there-done-that platformer. [Jan 2003, p.40]