- Publisher: Universal Interactive
- Release Date: Nov 3, 2002
User Score
3.5
out of 10
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 51 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 10 out of 51
-
Mixed: 6 out of 51
-
Negative: 35 out of 51
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Apr 10, 20131
-
Jan 6, 20135Gameplay haven't changed since last game, though it feels clumsier and stiffer. Levels and homeworld are pretty boring and blank. Loading is terrible. The story feels like it isn't finished. How did Ripto survive? The game didn't explain.
-
Dec 27, 20124
-
Nov 22, 20120This is one of the worst games I have ever played with Superman 64 and Sonic Genesis. This game is basically incomplete. The frame rate, story, game play, and voice acting is terrible. The graphics are decent for 2002 but that's it. NEVER PLAY THIS GAME!
-
Sep 22, 20124
-
May 4, 20124
-
Feb 5, 20124This game is fun and feels like a spyro game, but due to the long loading screens, very poor framerate, and overall a rushed feeling in most of the levels, makes it lose the magic that made you love the first 3
-
Nov 10, 20110
-
Apr 13, 20114Because Enter The Dragonfly refuses to part ways with its PS one predecessors, it feels overly familiar and overly cliche. Pros: Impressive graphics, lavish colors, and reasonable controls. Cons: All too simple and familiar gameplay, excruciatingly long load screens, and a lack of depth in imagination.
-
Oct 21, 20103
-
LydiaNov 29, 20095this game lacks a good storyline, the graphics and camera angles are horrific, but the loading times have to be the worst thing about this game! the fact it was rushed out to release gave the impression they wanted to do more, but couldn't. It was meant to feature 25 levels, but only included 9 when it was released! very disappointing!
-
-
squirrelSep 7, 20098I love this game but it could of been way better. the game was origanally going contain 25 levels but universal forced check6 to rush it and it ended up with nine levels and it was glitchy. it made me sad. its all universals fault. if they didnt force them to rush it it would probly be better then spyro 1 2 and 3 i still like the game. I am just mad at universal for forcing check6 to rush it.
-
-
FraserWJun 5, 20095
-
-
KennyJ.Jul 18, 20061
-
-
JonathanJ.Oct 6, 20050i used to love spyro for Ps1 but this is not spyro this is horrible some of the worst games beat this by a longshot. DISGRACE
-
-
ZacheryAug 5, 20050Sucks But i love the other 123 games of spyro.
-
-
AprilButteJul 29, 20050Horrible load times, freezes up in key areas making you replay and this is what is good about it! This is not the Spyro we know...it is a crappy Spyro. A spyro for profit not fun...dont buy! Dont play !
-
-
BethR.Feb 16, 200510It realy rocks.
-
-
TobyH.Aug 16, 200410A very good game. Sure it is not as good as V8 Supercars but it is still an awesome game with the graphics, sound effects, unlockables. If you finish it and just shelve it, you need to be shipped of to a mental hospitial.
-
-
EmmaG.Jul 6, 20042It was entertaining for a while, but then it was just monotonus. It seems the game makers were using their 'beautiful eye-catching graphics' to make up for this pathetic exuse for a platform game.
-
-
MarioM.May 2, 20040
-
-
RoboR.Oct 5, 20030
-
-
MorganN.Jun 3, 20033I was a huge fan when the series firts came out but take my advive and stick with the originals on PS one. :(
-
-
JoeS.Apr 6, 20035This game is alright. Once you get stuck in it has lots of decent features. 9 levels isn't enough but it's got fab graphics. I all so found it stalled and movies ran at the worst times (Ripto finding out the dragonflys were scattered when I was above 50%.) Not worth £40 but O.K in the long run!
-
-
StephR.Mar 29, 20033
-
-
TamH.Mar 15, 20032Well to tell the truth I wasted my money. The graphics are ok but the game has way to many glicks in it. To many times have we have had to restart the game cause it froze on us. We have the frist three and love them but this one was no good.
-
-
LiseR.Mar 4, 200310The graphics are great. the game is a little short but that's ok. and the hints are the best they get my brain thinking:)
-
-
LianaK.Feb 18, 20030
-
-
RyanM.Feb 10, 20035The style of play is beginning to be the same over and over again. I loved the first, and the other two were good, but Spyro is just getting old. They need to make more changes in the game. And the controls suck. You can't get him to look where you want him to. The graphics also stink. It may be ok to test the game out on a rental, but no more.
-
-
DavidL.Jan 14, 20038The graphics are cool, it is more playable, and I do like the multiple breaths. But I also think it was too short. What's 9 levels? It also took some getting used to. And it costs $50! I'm sorry, but $50 for a game, is rediculous!
-
-
CoryB.Jan 5, 200310Some people say that only little people would like this game and that it is too short i agree with that but just because i'm not a little person or that i think it's too short i still like it.
-
-
MicahC.Jan 3, 20032I spent the majority of my time with this game waiting for it to load!
-
-
RenaeJan 2, 20034I loved the previous PS1 Spyro games and was under the assumption that PS2 would be bigger and better. What went wrong? Did they sack all the 'Spyro Year of the Dragon' designers and recruit a bunch of kindergarteners. The graphics are ordinary, camera view is annoying, loading times rediculous and the rating I gave is being generous!
-
-
AprilM.Dec 29, 20022
-
-
KraigE.Dec 26, 200210This game is a briliant masterpiece, that everyone should buy. The graphics are great, the worlds are simply beautiful, and the plot is amazing. This is definetely worth 50$!
-
-
MargeL.Dec 25, 20024The game has changed, but in a bad way. The camera never matches with the character, making you dizy. The levels are unorganized. There are mini games, which are on levels, but are called levels. Compared to the original, it is horrible.
-
-
GlennDec 20, 20020In the first spyro games we would have rated the game a 10. Your new game. Is a joke, over half the area don't even work. I should have burned my $50. it would have been more enjoyable.
-
-
ChrisM.Dec 17, 20021Like Gamespot said "a train wreck of a game" It is unplayable. Horrible, terrible, yuck!
-
-
RogerA.Dec 12, 20021
-
-
JoeBobNov 20, 20020An total and utter embarassment.
-
-
There really isnt anything that separates it from other Spyro games. Actually in a lot of ways the PS1 games are much more enjoyable and original.
-
The graphics are nothing to be proud of, as they seem very similar to what we were presented with on the PS one not too long ago, and nothing in terms of the gameplay or style has changed a bit or improved upon in any way shape or form.
-
60Simply a decent been-there-done-that platformer. [Jan 2003, p.40]