Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring PlayStation 2
User Score
4.1 out of 10

Generally unfavorable- based on 14 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 14
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 14
  3. Negative: 8 out of 14

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. Bunny1022
    Mar 9, 2003
    2
    While i appreciate the attention to detail from the book, the game as an rpg sucks. the missions are pointless, the character design is laughable, and the camera angle are the worst ever, period. Do yourself a favor, if you MUST play this game do to some odd mental dysfunction you have, at least save yourself $50 and rent it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. Sam
    Sep 2, 2005
    1
    GOD this game sucks. Anyone who likes it is a moron. Best PS2 game ever? They obviously haven't played any of the GTA's or Ratchet and Clanks. Decent graphics, but simple controls and awful gameplay dissapoint me.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. NickJ.
    Jan 7, 2003
    1
    bbbbboooooorrrrrriiiinnggg. It's so bad it impossible to just get past a damn nazgul, you can't even see them, i got caught 10 times. Worst game ever.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. Biddaddy
    Feb 12, 2003
    0
    Couldnt get past the second major monster, impossible! iM GLAD I ONLY RENTED THE GAME.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. BobITSABOY
    Feb 16, 2003
    10
    It is the one of the best games out there for the Playstation Two and if you're a fan of Lord OF the Rings well the this is a must have for your collection.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. EldonT.
    Mar 7, 2004
    3
    The game is an attempt. it's really bad in the beginning. about the only good thing about it was the fact that it meticulously followed the storyline. the game needs more fighting. i mean come on! you probably kill about 40 enemies tops. and most of it is just "go find this" and "retrieve that". gandalf's limited abilities kill whatever interest you had in playing him. in short: don't pay more than $6.99 for this "interactive experience".… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. G-Money
    Jun 14, 2006
    7
    A game for people who like the book and want to play the story instead of just killing stuff over and over. Not the best game ever but not the worst either as some have said. A decent, light adventure game not aimed at the hard-core gamer market.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. hnfcx
    Jan 11, 2003
    0
    This game is so bad I can't even give it a 1.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. SeaToad
    Aug 24, 2003
    10
    BEST PS2 GAME EVER. hey! dont listen to the people saying "oh! i cant get past the nazgul" thats just hobbiton, what do u expect in the shire helms deep or something? GET THIS GAME.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. Connell
    Nov 5, 2011
    7
    For what it is it is fairly good,though it could have done with alot of polishing up.Its a gme you will either love our hate,but I would cautiously recommend it.
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
59 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 19 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 19
  2. Mixed: 13 out of 19
  3. Negative: 4 out of 19
  1. Games Radar
    60
    But why Surreal Software decided to make the playing the game such hard work is anyone's guess. [GamesMaster]
    Read full review
  2. G4 TV
    40
    The lackluster presentation combined with the clunky and often frustrating gameplay makes Fellowship of the Ring more of a chore to play than anything else.
    Read full review
  3. PSX Nation
    50
    One boring, predictable and by-the-numbers attempt to cash-in on the popularity of Peter Jackson’s movies.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »