Metascore
58

Mixed or average reviews - based on 21 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 21
  2. Negative: 3 out of 21

There are no positive critic reviews yet.

User Score
5.9

Mixed or average reviews- based on 18 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 11
  2. Negative: 4 out of 11
  1. Dec 7, 2011
    1
    Very Poor. They took away all the best things about the first two games (Open and non-linear landscapes, a second fireteam and the ability to fully customize them, switching between team members) and instead produced a SOCOM clone that has nothing to do with the first two games, and is vastly inferior to SOCOM in all ways to boot. The AI is a joke, watching two of my team mates and one enemy firing away at each other in the open from three feet away and no one getting hit, but everyone of their soldiers is a sharpshooter when aiming at you. Your team mates do nothing to aid in the missions at all. They don't even draw fire away from you. If all that didn't kill the atmosphere from the first two games, your Commanding Officer sounds like he moonlights as the Movie-Fone guy. This ought not have the Ghost Recon wording on the box. It's actually an entirely different shooter, and an extremely poor on at that

    Pros: Graphics and Background story
    Cons: Everything else
    Full Review »
  2. JackM.
    May 16, 2007
    3
    This was very boring. Sure the graphics may look good but gameplay was boring. It's easy to take damage; your constantly taking cover. There are no health packs. Your team is useless. And once you die, you start from the beginning of the mission; there are no checkpoints. All I can say is, very boring! Full Review »
  3. JasonG.
    Aug 9, 2006
    9
    Excellent, intense game. Great amount of strategy integrated with quite a bit of action makes for a superb gaming experience.