Metascore
60

Mixed or average reviews - based on 17 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 17
  2. Negative: 3 out of 17
  1. Comparing World Poker Tour to "World Series of Poker" is like asking if you’d rather be short & fat or ugly & stupid. The generally competent A.I. and career mode make this one the better choice, but your best bet is to leave both flops on the table and find a new game altogether.
  2. Until there's an online PS2 poker game where you play with real money, games like this are an irrelevance in the face of the Internet gambling phenomenon. [Christmas 2005, p.108]
  3. The graphics are mostly serviceable, but the AI is all over the map. [Holiday 2005, 92]
User Score
8.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 5 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 3
  2. Negative: 0 out of 3
  1. GregR.
    Oct 21, 2007
    8
    Its good but the graphics are bad and the other players names are really dum. Its a game were you can play alot of and not get bored.
  2. DvaudbvuR.
    May 19, 2006
    10
    This game sucked i hated it it's slow takes forever to load and i get ace's 90% of the time it's too easy and a waste of money.
  3. Mukso1495ad
    Jan 17, 2006
    5
    The weakest of the three. Graphics are slightly better then WSOP and WCoP2. Gameplay is very repetitive. The AI checks too often. The pro playercharacters seem just as lost as you are trying to figure the other players. One can never catch a flop. The AI calls you with bad cards and almost always gets rewarded. If you are a pretty good poker play then I wouldn't reccomend it. This game will only fustrate you to when your huge pocket pairs get beat out by horrendous calls. Full Review »