User Score
4.8
out of 10
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 222 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 86 out of 222
-
Mixed: 32 out of 222
-
Negative: 104 out of 222
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Dec 12, 20115
-
Mar 2, 20136
-
Aug 13, 20114I think it's time for Duke Nukem to be retired because Forever was a disappointment and a disgrace to make a comeback after 14 years of development issues. I played the demo and it wasn't that even good. I think that this game has been outdated or something, but with a comeback to the FPS format, well I just don't want to conglomerate myself. Duke Nukem Forever was the worst game of 2011.
-
Jun 25, 20115
-
Aug 3, 20110
-
Jul 30, 20120
-
Dec 25, 20113This game shows why it should have been made 12 years ago. It's more stupid than clever or entertaning, and the graphics are unappeling. GameMarket sells the game for 6 bucks, spend your 6 bucks in a gumball.
-
Oct 1, 20127Doesn't deserve all the **** it gets. I played the old Duke Nukem games, and I can say this game still has the old Duke style when it comes to character. This is what you SHOULD'VE expected a new Duke game to be, and though it's technically lacking, everything works fine and this game keept me entertained the whole playthrough.
-
Jun 21, 20110
-
Nov 14, 20117
-
Oct 4, 20110
-
Jun 15, 20115
-
Mar 1, 20125
-
Jun 21, 20111Might as well have been released back in 1997. Boring, ugly and janky gameplay served with poor graphics and flat lighting. It's a wonder how a game with Duke's name on it can involve so little shooting and even then it still dosen't deliver.
-
Jun 15, 20119
-
May 30, 20131
-
Jan 21, 201310
-
Feb 4, 20127
-
May 3, 20134
-
Jul 1, 20119This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Mar 20, 20126
-
Jun 17, 201110Totally undeserving of such low scores, especially with so many uninventive and tedious sequels getting 9's or higher. Honestly, more varied and fun, though perhaps not as polished as most AAA shooters of this generation.
-
Jun 19, 20116
-
Jul 1, 201110
-
Jun 12, 20136As a big fan of Duke I got to say that this is not the best game, but not the worst either, it has it fun moments but is trying to hard to become more then it is whice leaves me like nah.. but still the king of the hill baby for em just try one more time with less throwing
-
Jun 28, 20110This is an abomination and offends in every sense of the word. It is like purchasing a box of self-torture and injecting it directly into your ears and eyes. I don't even want to think about this game anymore, just please avoid it. Go play superman 64 or ET for the atari instead.
-
Jul 30, 20119This game is fantastic, but with a warning to any who may consider buying it; Please realize this game was developed using old development techniques. Seriously, this game is a very good throwback, and it's humor and pop culture references make up for it's limited gameplay.
-
Jun 16, 20117
-
Jul 14, 20117
-
Jun 14, 20110Garbage no matter what system it's on, I already ranted on it for the 360.... Randy could sell you all a box of dirt and you would buy it, don't do it.... There was no reason to ever release this game...
-
Oct 6, 201150It's true that there are plenty of superior overall shooters out there that'd murder for a character with a quarter of the charisma Duke Nukem oozes. He's a dinosaur; a two-dimensional mound of muscles with a gun. But that's the joke. Duke Nukem Forever really is a several-year old game masquerading as a new release. [August 2011 p67]
-
Aug 2, 201130Forever eschews any hope for a decent story or interesting gameplay in favor of shoving as many boobs in our face as possible. As a result, the game comes up short in every way possible.
-
Jul 25, 201120Plain and simple, Duke Nukem Forever suffers from being passed around the development table for too long without any updates to its core.