- Publisher: Electronic Arts
- Release Date: Nov 16, 2010
- Also On: DS, PC, Wii, Xbox 360
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
Dec 19, 201065The biggest problem with the game is the camera which unfortunately becomes frustrating at certain stages in the game which generally involve combat. Oh well, if you enjoyed the previous Harry Potter games, you might enjoy these but maybe a rent first.
-
Nov 25, 201063The newest installment of the series steps away from the open world approach of the last games and narrows itself to dull, repetitive rail shooter missions. The graphics are not even noteworthy while music and sound are superb as ever. Overall, the game feels extremely simplified due to the restrictions of Microsofts Kinect technology.
-
Dec 10, 201060Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 is not convincing as an action adventure, but as a pure-bred action game it's entertaining.
-
Nov 16, 201055Like a Quidditch player falling from a broomstick mid-match, this installment loses all forward momentum and goes plummeting toward a faceplant at top speed.
-
Nov 19, 201050The game is full of good ideas tethered to a slop of bugs, but more significantly it's never much of anything. It's never varied enough to have interesting combat; it's never open enough to let you explore; it's linear but never driven enough by its narrative to be an enthralling, story-driven title.
-
Nov 18, 201050While the third-person shooter aspect of Harry's latest adventure can be fun, the game's story elements fail to live up to those of its literary namesake.
-
Nov 24, 201045It was a good opportunity to reinvigorate and polish the series and adapt to the final adventures of this characters. But the changes have been executed poorly, and that results in gameplay defects.
-
Nov 19, 201045A disappointing tie in. Lame gameplay, artificial unintelligence and a lot of issues with the controls will spoil the fun event for the most hardcore fans.
-
Jan 13, 201141Dark, confusing. [Jan 2011, p.96]
-
Feb 16, 201140A couple hours in, and you're starting to feel pretty stupid yourself! [Jan 2011, p.118]
-
Jan 18, 201140Thumb-numbing repetitiveness. [Feb 2011, p.86]
-
Dec 21, 201040Unfortunately there are too many mundane missions and not enough variety throughout the game to make this an exciting shooter and the distinct lack of collectibles (something that the previous games prided themselves on) is also disappointing and makes exploring the bland levels pointless.
-
Dec 19, 201040Harry Potter and the Deadly Hallows - Part 1 does not succeed in enchanting us with great quality. The terrible gameplay completely ruins this game and will keep you from spending a lot of hours on the latest adventure of the young wizard. Harry Potter fans should stay away from this one.
-
Nov 21, 201040Potter fans will be disappointed by this lazy attempt that is substandard fare and lacks options. EA Bright Light will have to revolutionise its approach if the franchise is to end on a high.
-
Nov 21, 201040Avada Kedavra… EA casts the spell and takes the series in the third person shooter genre. The result is the worst Harry Potter game of all times, a game you'd better close in the tallest tower of Hogwarts.
-
Dec 10, 201037This Harry Potter game is one of the worst games in 2010 for the PlayStation 3. The graphics aren't very best, the gameplay is annoying and the camera doesn't work. Go watch the Movie and don't ever buy this game, it isn't worth your money.
-
Nov 17, 201035Maybe EA Games could rename Part 2 "Harry Potter and the Multiple Revenue Streams". Because if we are going to be honest, that's all this title really is.
-
Nov 23, 201030With poor visuals, flawed gameplay and a narrative that fails to adhere closely to the source material, Deathly Hallows Part 1 is a colossal disappointment for gamers and Harry Potter aficionados' alike.
-
Nov 18, 201030Quotation forthcoming.
-
Nov 18, 201030Harry Potter turns into a wannabe third person shooter, and the result is abysmal. Movie-based games get a bad rap, and its because of titles like this one. We can't think of anything nice to say about it, not even when playing it with Kinect. It's a bad game from end to end, and has no redeeming qualities. Avoid at all cost, even if (or maybe especially if) you're a Harry Potter-head.
-
Nov 16, 201025So much in this game speaks to either a lack of time or pure laziness on the part of the developers.
-
Dec 29, 201021We can think of no good reason to buy this. [Issue#200, p.94]
-
Jan 5, 201120Seriously, EA?! Why do you insist in crapping all over the franchise during its final hours? The game takes about 5 to 7 hours to complete, but frustration kicks in after the first 20 minutes of play.
-
Dec 1, 201020Garbage.
-
Nov 26, 201020The best book in the Harry Potter series has become the worst game. This is just a horrible buggy mess with no entertainment at all. Just move along to the next game.
-
Nov 23, 201020If you're an moldu who's super-fan, be sure that I understand you, but don't be fooled. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 is clearly underwhelming, and doesn't compare in any way to any other TPS in terms of quality. Imprecise, slow, poorly designed, we can't even recommend this Harry Potter game to the most tolerant fans.
-
Nov 16, 201020There's potential for a good Harry Potter game underneath this pile of broken gameplay.