NHL 2001 PlayStation
Metascore
88 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 10 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 10
  3. Negative: 0 out of 10
view
per page
  1. Daily Radar
    100
    A fast and fun hockey game that gives you all the options, modes and action you could want from a hockey game.
    All this publication's reviews
  2. GamePro
    100
    NHL 2001 takes this year's PlayStation Championship (against Sony's "FaceOff"), but it was a tight seven game showdown.
  3. CNET Gamecenter
    90
    By combining excellent graphics, strong gameplay, superlative control, and outstanding features, it's a fitting end to an excellent era in console hockey.
    All this publication's reviews
  4. PSX Nation
    90
    This may be the best single player experience (EA has) come up with yet.
  5. Hot Games
    90
    The frame rate is pretty bad and arenas are generic, but player models look detailed, at least.

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
9.2 out of 10

Universal acclaim- based on 5 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 4
  3. Negative: 0 out of 4
  1. GreggC.S.
    10
    NHL 2001 is a very competitive game, I enjoy it a lot.
  2. AlC.
    10
    This is a great game even if you do not watch hockey. After winning the cup, I thought the game was over, right? WRONG! Like most sports games you play many seasons. I did not know this by reading. But it was cool. After about 5 seasons, most of my team was gone. But new, fake guys came up. If you had a late pick in the draft, that guy sucks. So I say buy this game and if you don't know the rules, turn them off.… Full Review »
  3. KarlD.
    10
    A truly enjoyable hockey experience. I do not look at the graphics, which are not that bad either, but at the great gameplay. You'll play it again and again. The AI is superb and it puts you in the game! Exellent game! If you love hockey, sport, or own a playstation, go buy this game! NOW!!… Full Review »
See all user reviews »