- Publisher: Atari
- Release Date: May 25, 2011
- Also On: PlayStation 3
User Score
5.1
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 47 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 18 out of 47
-
Mixed: 8 out of 47
-
Negative: 21 out of 47
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
May 26, 20113
-
May 26, 20114
-
May 26, 20118The game has its bugs but don't let the reviews fool you into not trying this awesome game. Its diablo in 3d with 4 players online. If they iron out the bugs then it will be great all around game. The only thing I didn't like was the fact that you couldn't customize your character like diablo, but the team oriented play is great. Already maxed a cleric. Battle clerics own all lol.
-
May 26, 20114
-
May 27, 20117
-
May 26, 20118
-
May 30, 20112Its sad that this continues the weak attempt to project the RPG Tabletop experience that one has in D&D the table top game, but it was a nice attempt. I like games but still cant connect the name here with the original at all.
-
Jun 3, 20111
-
May 28, 20118It is a hack and slash game. You can hack, you can slash and you're able to do that with three friends. That's it. What did most of the reviewers expect? Content of a full price release and a serious diablo killer?
-
May 26, 20118If you were a fan of Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance or Dungeons and Dragons: Heroes then you should have no problem jumping into this top-down RPG. Daggerdale might not be as polished as either of those two, but it keeps the addicting gameplay intact.
-
May 31, 20118It's not perfect game, but I have not noticed significant bugs/tearing as mentioned below. Local co-op works fairly well (occasionally blocking of views, so lots of camera rotating). Have to say I have found the value to be pretty good at $15. If you like ARPGs... I think it is worth playing (but don't expect to be playing it for than a few weeks).
-
Jun 2, 20117
-
May 25, 20117
-
May 26, 20112
-
May 28, 20118
-
May 29, 20116This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Jun 3, 20111
-
Jun 15, 201110I've played better and less buggy Dungeons titles, however I wouldn't pay much heed to the 3/10 and 4/10 scores on here. The game deserves at very least a 6/10, but I would say 8/10 for its replay value. You can tell the game will last you forever if you put in some time and effort.
-
Jun 13, 20116
-
May 31, 20115
-
Jun 28, 20110
-
Jun 12, 20113Its better then Dragon Age 2 but that is not saying much and it's cheap. It was very repetitive, lacked a map that can scroll, and all of the classes are a bit weak no voice acting and its still better then Dragon age 2.
-
Jun 2, 20111
-
Jun 2, 20114
-
Jun 2, 20118
-
Jul 19, 20112Sucked worse than a cold McGriddle. So much potential, like Lindsay Lohan pre-Mean Girls. Insulting for anyone whom appreciates the franchise or who are smarter than Lenny from 'Of Mice and Men'
-
Dec 21, 20125
-
Dec 12, 201130Dungeons and Dragons: Daggerdale could have been a great title if the developers had taken the time to work out the bugs. If you're easily frustrated over games or their glitches, you most likely will be spiking your controller on the floor and walking away in bitter shame.
-
Aug 23, 201150A grind in more ways than one. [Sept 2011, p.101]
-
Jul 25, 201154Rather lacklustre. [Sept 2011, p.87]