Ninety-Nine Nights Xbox 360

User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 58 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 26 out of 58
  2. Negative: 16 out of 58
Buy On

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. JamesA.
    Dec 21, 2006
    7
    This game needs work but it is on the right track. First the good, if you like Dynasty Warriors or Kingdom Under Fire this game is for you. (Made by the KUF people.) This game has quite a few items you can collect along the way but most don't have a use except the weapons. Another good is how many guys are o the screen/level. If you beat any level, you will probably kill around 2000 This game needs work but it is on the right track. First the good, if you like Dynasty Warriors or Kingdom Under Fire this game is for you. (Made by the KUF people.) This game has quite a few items you can collect along the way but most don't have a use except the weapons. Another good is how many guys are o the screen/level. If you beat any level, you will probably kill around 2000 guys. Another good is that your guys follow you unlike Dynasty Warriors. Also, the graphics in this game are okay. Now for the bad. This game is frustrating. If u don't replay easier levels to level up your character, you'll spent lost of time getting mad. For example, your first character's last level is 50 min long with 2 different bosses and your guys all die and there is no checkpoints. So you have to replay levels to boost your level. This game can get old pretty fast. The achievements are pretty hard to get so be ready for a few months to years to totally beat this game. RENT IT FIRST. Expand
  2. CarcasGalactic
    Aug 26, 2006
    7
    Gets a seven. Talking is way off from the lips. Going for 50 min and then having to do it all over again when you die, just gay. Killing killing killing is sort of fun. Nice graphics is the movies. Nice to see the main character grap your boobs in the opening movie. Could have been alot better. If you have nothing better to do it's a good way to get gammer score.
  3. HarryL.
    Sep 14, 2006
    5
    Good graphics but there's still a lot to improve on. Like the saving system!
  4. LionelE.
    Nov 16, 2007
    6
    If you want to press one button a lot for a couple of hours, this is your game. If you want any kind of tactical depth, look elsewhere.
  5. Sep 14, 2016
    7
    Personally I think people are scoring this game a little harsh it actually is quite a decent game. I think the real problem with this game is that people buy it not knowing the genre they are buying and then somehow are disappointed. It is not a deep tactical game it is a hack and slash. These games are meant as easy games to play with decent action....and this game is exactly that. ThePersonally I think people are scoring this game a little harsh it actually is quite a decent game. I think the real problem with this game is that people buy it not knowing the genre they are buying and then somehow are disappointed. It is not a deep tactical game it is a hack and slash. These games are meant as easy games to play with decent action....and this game is exactly that. The problem I have with this game is it makes you travel to one area of the map and then back to the area you were at already way too many times with no action imbetween. This got boring fast. It was very difficult to play more than one mission per gameplay session because of this. Overall though this game was an easy game to pick up and play and was very enjoyable. It just wasn't deep and rewarding. I think my last two sentences entirely explain the polarized player review scores. Expand
  6. Apr 16, 2013
    6
    A pretty, but rather bland, slasher that tries too hard to be Dynasty Warriors. There really isn't anything wrong with this game, but there isn't really anything right either. Combat is a bit fun at first, but get terribly repetitive after a while. For an early Xbox 360 title, it is visually impressive, at least when it came out.

    Overall: A rather generic Dynasty style third person
    A pretty, but rather bland, slasher that tries too hard to be Dynasty Warriors. There really isn't anything wrong with this game, but there isn't really anything right either. Combat is a bit fun at first, but get terribly repetitive after a while. For an early Xbox 360 title, it is visually impressive, at least when it came out.

    Overall:
    A rather generic Dynasty style third person slasher that is fun for a little while, but after a weekend of playing, you'll be through with it.
    Expand
  7. May 30, 2013
    6
    A fun little game where you slaughter hundreds of soldiers with one fatal sword swing. Get's a bet boring doing it over and over, but it was still enjoyable.
  8. Oct 19, 2014
    5
    Aweful execution and a complete waste of money. Glitches, bad bosses. bad voice acting, bad scripting, just an all out BAD game.Glad I didn't pay full price and got it on sale.
Metascore
61

Mixed or average reviews - based on 66 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 66
  2. Negative: 3 out of 66
  1. Edge Magazine
    60
    Ninety-Nine Nights deserves a better score... That's a strange ways to put it, but it comes from the fact that its most grating flaws occur at such a fundamental level that it's a mystery they were ever tolerated at all. [JPN Import; June 2006, p.89]
  2. Games Master UK
    69
    Half epic, half irritating slash-'em-up that's as grand as it is sloppy. [July 2006, p.69]
  3. games(TM)
    50
    Most of the time Ninety-Nine Nights does look like a game which befits the ‘next-gen’ tag, and yet periodically it embarrasses itself with ‘previous-gen’ foibles. Playing N3 is a frustrating experience. [July 2006, p.124]