- Publisher: Ubisoft
- Release Date: Dec 2, 2008
- Also On: PC, PlayStation 3
User Score
7.0
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 122 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 81 out of 122
-
Mixed: 17 out of 122
-
Negative: 24 out of 122
Review this game
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Mar 13, 20114
-
Nov 18, 20102Nowhere near as good as the Trilogy, SO REPETITVE, its nothing like the older games and it well really shouldnt be named Price of Persia should be called Prince of RAGE quit.. so many times has he jumped in the wrong direction or jumps when i didnt even press the button.. so frustration and its WAYYY too easy
-
JohnnyLamontJan 17, 20095Great visuals, great fighting, but...I got sick of it pretty fast. Having to collect hundreds of blue orbs really bored me, and the positive things about the game couldn't outweigh the extremely boring navigating and collecting of blue orbs. you'll see why it's so annoying if you buy this game.
-
-
jtJul 25, 20095
-
-
JonathonCJan 15, 20100This is possibly the worst, most repetitive game i have ever played, do not buy, rent or even borrow for free. The only lure it has is the old games reputation, you want to finish it but it presents so little enjoyment you would gain more reward from looking at a real wall than running sideways across one in this game!
-
-
KevinFJan 23, 20092
-
-
HagenMJan 7, 20098
-
-
JayGFeb 3, 20099The new PoP is visually stunning, the gameplay is absolutley fun, and the story will leave you begging for more. The only complaint which is is a lot of comments is that you cant die. Other than that the game is great, must buy for fans, rental for those who are new to the series.
-
-
AlixeVioletDec 5, 200810
-
-
[Anonymous]Dec 6, 20088
-
-
McDeadChowderDec 9, 200810
-
-
TomBDec 17, 20093
-
-
RobHMar 13, 20096
-
-
JamesPAug 31, 20090
-
-
EricESep 5, 20097
-
-
MikaHDec 12, 20084
-
-
SamuelHutchisonDec 6, 20087Non-linear gameplay is a big buzzword these days, but it only adds replay value if things change depending on what order you do them in. In PoP you can do things in any order you want, but which zones you've already cleared has no affect on what you're doing now, or what you do next. You could play it again and do everything backwards, but why?
-
-
MichaelBDec 7, 20083
-
-
MattDec 7, 20081
-
-
TjarkKJan 18, 20096
-
-
SaxonUDec 27, 200810
-
-
GeorgeRDec 26, 20094If you played the Sands of Time Triology, this is a different game. Its limited, linear, repetitive and frustrating. A huge step backwards in what was meant to be the next gen Prince.
-
-
Apr 25, 20116
-
Oct 22, 20107Well made and a joy to run around in. I found this game quite relaxing and it's no way as bad as most people would say. A game I want in my collection.
-
Dec 11, 20108
-
Aug 18, 20115
-
Feb 20, 20114
-
Apr 18, 20113
-
Aug 18, 20118For the most part, this game is really good. The graphics are really nice, the game play is good, the story is interesting and the characters are good. I've been a fan of the series since The Sands of Time, and I've loved Prince of Persia since. Even though this is a reboot, I liked it a lot.
-
Oct 10, 20119
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
70The game's core mechanics are all still there, neatly created and presented stunningly. But underneath this evident beauty, Prince of Persia fails to deliver on any sort of a challenge, and instead of carrying on the proud tradition of the series, deviates to a considerable and damaging extent because of its simple gameplay and excessive accessibility.
-
While Prince of Persia is definitely flawed and can even become tedious at points, it creates a dreamlike world that keeps you interested. It is an interactive extension of what good fiction tries to be, and while it's not for everyone, it can often leave you with a desire to come back for more.
-
Newcomers are likely to get more out of this new trilogy's opening than veterans, who know much better. [Feb 2009, p.74]