Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
Supreme Commander 2 Xbox 360
User Score
7.4 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 15 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 15
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 15
  3. Negative: 3 out of 15

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. BobbyS.
    Mar 17, 2010
    3
    Not near as good as the PC version. Sometimes RTS should stick to PC and concentrate on making that the best experience possible!
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  2. AlexandraJ.
    Mar 29, 2010
    9
    Simply fantastic and fun. Easy to pick up but still challenging enough to have struggle.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  3. SinisterVortex
    Mar 13, 2011
    7
    A far cry from its predecessor, SC2 is a major disappointment. Lesser scale, story (from what little there was in the first game to begin with), and dumbed down game mechanics make this a classic case of sequel slump. The story is not so much worse then that of the first game. The problem with this is the fact that the first game didn't really have a story worth mentioning. Just like SC1, the second game tells more or less the same conflict from the perspectives of three different commanders, each belonging to one of the three factions. It does try to have some depth, but any attempt at this is mired by terrible writing and voice acting that is often even worse. My least favorite character is the villain, who tries to come across as sinister but only succeeds is making himself look like a crazy person of the type you would find a loony bin. The gameplay tries to live up to that of the first game, but ultimately fails due to the degree to which everything has been simplified. To build things you now have to pay up front instead of just having a steady enough flow of mass and energy. To make matters worse, the economy system is even more time consuming because you have to set up so many resource structures. There are fewer unit types to choose from as well, so prepare to miss the good old days when you always had the right unit for the right situation. Furthermore, the scale seems like less then a tenth of that of the first game. No more continent sized maps, just small islands. Most if not all of the content you get from this game will be from multiplayer, as the campaigns are not worth playing. However, there is still some fun to be had with matchmaking, particularly for the console version. There are quite a few bugs though, so don't be surprised if you have to wait more then ten minutes for a stable match. Overall, this game is an average RTS, but still a failure considering how far reduced it is from the original. Speaking of which, if you have the first game and its expansion on your PC, stick with that. There is nothing in this game that will be worth your while over what you already have.… Expand
  4. JaredO.
    Mar 20, 2010
    7
    Supreme Commander 2 is a good game just not great. I think that SC2 should can the story for Total Annihilation story which is just a battle between two factions. Simple and to the point. Otherwise that game is good and very good RTS.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
75 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 28 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 28
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 28
  3. Negative: 1 out of 28
  1. IGN
    83
    If the learning curve of the original Supreme Commander proved a little too steep for you, then you'll find a lot to like about the sequel. Gas Powered Games streamlined its resource and upgrade systems to make a game that's easier to play, and thanks to a revamped interface much easier to control.
    Read full review
  2. GameSpot
    75
    This entertaining strategy sequel is a big improvement over the console original, and bridges the gap between complexity and accessibility.
    Read full review
  3. Games Master UK
    91
    At once accessible and incredibly deep. But best of all, so much fun. [May 2010, p.81]
See all critic reviews »