- Publisher: Ignition Entertainment , AQ Interactive
- Release Date: Jul 3, 2007
User Score
2.8
out of 10
Generally unfavorable- based on 26 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 8 out of 26
-
Mixed: 0 out of 26
-
Negative: 18 out of 26
Review this game
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JamesM.Jul 25, 20071This game blows, it's some kind of horrible Spliter-Cell/Syphon Filter type game (but worse...) with vampires thrown in, in order to try to sell a few copies to those people that enjoy the occult and vampire related games.
-
-
KimC.Jul 4, 20071Cheap graphix...boring sneaknig...horrible level design.and AI.This is the worst sneak game ever.
-
-
RyencokeJul 4, 20070This game is worse than Bomberman, and nobody thought it would be possible to beat. This game surely does it, what a waste of money.
-
-
WillB.Aug 7, 20078
-
-
JohnDoeFeb 14, 20080
-
-
EliE.Apr 7, 20089This game is a good game, it's just most people don't know how to play it, if you like games such as Splinter Cell and other type stealth games, you will love this game for sure. Because almost anyone who played this game and said it sucked, probably just ran around like an idiot with there gun out and tried to kill the vampires.
-
-
BrianF.Jul 13, 20078
-
-
Apr 14, 20117wow I guess people just do not know how to play games anymore, that is why this got a bad score. It isn't the best game and it definatly has its flaws but it's not as bad as what people make it out to be.
-
Apr 16, 20111
-
May 1, 20121Boring, repetitive, and it goes on and on forever. It sucks.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
The stealth BK game "Sneak King" is actually more of an entertaining game than Vampire Rain is. [Sept 2007, p.70]
-
40Vampire Rain is simply a sloppy, masochistic mess that wastes an otherwise solid concept and functional form.
-
Virtually nothing works as it should, and what does owes an enormous debt to a few evergreen classics. Disappointing. [Issue 23, p.79]