User Score
8.1

Generally favorable reviews- based on 25 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 25
  2. Negative: 3 out of 25
Buy On

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. JamesI.
    Oct 27, 2003
    3
    EA had better get with the program and embrace Xbox Live- or at the very least include include co-op modes with their shooters. The deathmatch mode in this game (like Medal of Honour) is a total embarrassment.
  2. StephenH.
    Dec 30, 2003
    2
    Somethun went wrong when they made this game...graphics questionable and movin the camera constantly is horrible, if u like this game u liked goin against never ending soviets and armed with poor A.I. story line was ok, why couldnt u ever get more then 5 ammo for a gun?

Awards & Rankings

40
41
#41 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2003
39
#39 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2003
Metascore
82

Generally favorable reviews - based on 23 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 23
  2. Negative: 0 out of 23
  1. games(TM)
    80
    It's far less intricate than a regular squad-based game, yet it retains all the elements that make them fun - as opposed to a title like Brute Force, which had none of them. A fine display of IO's creative talent. [Oct 2003, p.116]
  2. Xbox Nation Magazine
    70
    While level design is solid, NPCs have the personalities of spatulas, and environments are often jarringly noninteractive... Worth the ride, certainly, but this one could have done with a little less fighting and a little more freedom. [Oct/Nov 2003, p.98]
  3. GMR Magazine
    70
    Fighters plays up the action while devaluing its story with cookie-cutter bad guys, bad accents, and jingoistic sentiments. [Oct 2003, p.76]