User Score
9.0

Universal acclaim- based on 32 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 30 out of 32
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 32
  3. Negative: 2 out of 32

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Aug 20, 2011
    10
    This game is my personal favorite 1st person shooter. Obviously all you stupid COD players out there will say "this game SUCKS because it is so unrealistic. same goes with mario! unlike COD, brah!" but the truth is they dont try to be. do you think a game trying to be realistic would include cloaks, monkeys, zombies, an' stuf? think about it though, COD has refilling health- UNREALISTIC, zombies- UNREALISTIC, enemies have to shoot you multiple times to kill you- UNREALISTIC. The truth is no game can be too realistic. I'm not jacking on COD in any way. Its a pretty good game. I'm jacking on the fanboys. but let me talk about the game. So, i like this game a lot. it has a good story, a good mapmaker good characters. its also very funny. so yeah. goodbye for now. Expand
Metascore
83

Generally favorable reviews - based on 54 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 51 out of 54
  2. Negative: 0 out of 54
  1. Every aspect of the game feels polished and ready to go, whether it's the single-player story, the online multiplayer, the numerous unlockables, or the custom mapmaker. This is one of those rare Jack-of-all-trades that has actually mastered them all.
  2. Its Story mode is distinctly improved, brought together by a plot which is well acted out and never ceases to amuse. The Arcade component returns with more refinements and online play, cleverly engineered to reduce undue frustration.
  3. As forgettable as the story mode is, this is a game that should be judged by the pleasure it can bring to a room full of gamers eager for furious arena combat and a splendid variety of team games. And judged by those criteria, it has few peers. [Apr 2005, p.94]