Games
Sony
Microsoft
Nintendo
Other Platforms
Upcoming &
Recent Releases
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed games.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone

Mixed or average reviews
Based on 11 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 2 votes
Read user comments
Rate this game >
Game Info
Publisher: Electronic Arts
Developer: Warthog
Genre(s): Third-Person Action, Adventure
Players: 1
ESRB Rating: E (Everyone)
Release Date: December 9, 2003
Summary
The next generation versions of Sorcerer's Stone not only use story elements from the first book and film, but also include content exclusive to these versions of the game. This brand-new Harry Potter experience includes new characters, locations, and gameplay, plus a new ending and a day/night format that highlights game-specific story elements.
Also On Metacritic
GAMES: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Cheat Codes & Hints: Cheat Code Central
Also On The Web: Official Game Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
GameZone
The gameplay borrows heavily from the Zelda games and it works to great effect here. The controls are simple and easily mastered, never getting in the way of the gamers enjoyment of the game.
Read Full Review >TotalGames.net
The best accolade Philosopher's Stone can receive is that it makes the events of the first story (published way back in the twentieth century) seem fresh for the fans, while hiding nothing from the uninitiated.
Read Full Review >IGN
Worst of all, the game's general lack of polish also means that it's buggy and sometimes employs questionable character artificial intelligence.
Read Full Review >TeamXbox
One of those games which you know is going to grate the nerves from the get-go; a cut-scene to show a door opening?
Read Full Review >Next Level Gaming
Music and sounds are solid, but Harry Potters voice is like a cheese grater on the brain.
Read Full Review >Official Xbox Magazine
Games are meant to be played, not watched, and this one has more cinemas than "Metal Gear Solid." [Jan 2004, p.79]
GameSpot
A weak follow-up to Chamber of Secrets that seems like an awkward fit for anyone who already owns last year's game.
Read Full Review >GameSpy
Yes, a lot of the gameplay is boring and clunky, but through books and movies we've come to think of Harry and crew as friends, so the true fan will be able to look past a lot of the game's quirks and have a relatively decent experience.
Read Full Review >Xbox Nation Magazine
Yep, this is basically a rehash of last year's Chamber of Secrets game for Playstation, with similar visuals, controls, and combat. [Mar 2004, p.82]
1UP
It's hard to even say what's good about the game, because every attempt to get at the fun parts is like swimming to shore with lead weights on both feet.
Read Full Review >Game Revolution
Other than a couple isolated bits HP and the SS is a mess. And I didnt play crap like this when I was a kid, at least not for long. I played Sonic. So there ya have it: Harry Potter is better than a Vomit flavored bean, but a little worse than Grass, and on a level with Booger.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this game is 5.0 (out of 10) based on 2 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Matthew J. gave it a 10:
I love all of the Harry Potter games and this is no exeption!
