Games
Sony
Microsoft
Nintendo
Other Platforms
Upcoming &
Recent Releases
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed games.
Soldier of Fortune II: Double Helix

Mixed or average reviews
Based on 26 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 14 votes
Read user comments
Rate this game >
Game Info
Publisher: Activision
Developer: Gratuitious Games - Raven Software
Genre(s): Action, First-Person Shooter
Players: 10
ESRB Rating: M (Mature)
Release Date: June 17, 2003
Summary
Reprise the role of John Mullins: patriot, weapons specialist, anti-terrorist mercenary and "Military Consultant." Trust no one only your ability to take out operatives with your brains, brawn and firepower. Failure is not an option. [Activision]
Cheat Codes & Hints: Cheat Code Central
Also On The Web: Official Website
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Official Xbox Magazine
A case of Jekyll and Hyde. Single player isn't bad, but the multiplayer is head and shoulders cooler than than the PC version, thanks largely to the clever use of the Xbox Communicator. [June 2003, p.76]
Game Informer
Any game with 55 single-player missions is worth checking out. Add to that equation Double Helix's excellent graphical system and blistering gameplay and you've got a hit on your hands. [July 2003, p.116]
GamePro
Sometimes enemies take time to notice you, but once they do, the A.I. is fairly impressive.
Read Full Review >Gamezilla!
This is a very traditional realistic FPS, lacking in any serious innovation, relying on the same gameplay that's worked before. However, ultimately, I found it a bit boring.
Read Full Review >Game Chronicles
Rather disappointing. A lot of the strategic edge has been stripped away from the gameplay and there is no new content or bonus features to entice PC gamers to reinvest in a new copy.
Read Full Review >GameZone
Sadly, the graphics dont even come close to the sharp visuals of the PC version--something the Xbox could have easily replicated.
Read Full Review >Play Magazine
Ultimately feels like it is a year old, and its technical limitations hurt the finer parts of the game. [July 2003, p.72]
GameShark
It's got great potential, even high expectations, and in every department there is some glaring detail that cannot be overlooked. Had there been just a little more time spent with it, tweaking the small things here and there, it could have been a surefire hit.
Read Full Review >Armchair Empire
Comes up shooting blanks with a very mediocre adaptation that has few redeemable features outside its strong multiplayer Xbox Live presence.
Read Full Review >G4 TV
Are we operating under regulation Xbox parameters here? Visually speaking, everything's bland, blocky, and the visibility is poor. The game is not pretty. Enemy movements are sluggish as if they're suffering from joint pain as they fire at you.
Read Full Review >GMR Magazine
The bad news is this: The game's graphics look dated. Most characters are blocky and reek of a poor PC port job. And Xbox Live support...needs an overhaul. [Aug 2003, p.74]
TotalGames.net
An example to developers the world over that just because there is gratuitous violence, the game is not necessarily a winner. A great PC title can still flop on the Xbox, even with the addition of Live gameplay.
Read Full Review >GameNow
Although SOF2 is ultimately just disposable entertainment - the kind of game you'll forget about minutes after beating it. [Aug 2003, p.33]
Into Liquid Sky
With lengthy load times, rare slowdown, the occasional clipping problem and an imperfect graphics engine, the basic "corridor shooter" feel of the single player mode can be bogged down and even become tedious to some.
Read Full Review >IGN
When you have "Halo" and "Ghost Recon" in your library, there's little reason to spend $50 bucks on a very average shooter with sub-standard Xbox graphics.
Read Full Review >Electronic Gaming Monthly
Fortune II doesn't have the same visual polish or addictive team-based onlne play of ["Return to Castle Wolfenstein"]. [Aug 2003, p.112]
TeamXbox
In simple terms, this game was brought to the Xbox unpolished, incomplete, and unready. Theres plenty to go through in SoF2, but its too bland and it isnt worth spending numerous hours trying to complete.
Read Full Review >GameSpy
Even the overdone gore isn't realistic enough for the morally unhinged. It's a lackluster experience and part-time embarrassment to the hardware potential of this game system.
Read Full Review >GamingWorld X
The poor graphics and ho-hum gameplay really killed any chance this game had to compete with the fantastic games arriving this summer. Even Xbox Live compatibility couldn't rescue it from the realm of inadequacy.
Read Full Review >GameSpot
Double Helix doesn't do anything that hasn't already been done better in Activision's own Return to Castle Wolfenstein.
Read Full Review >Cheat Code Central
SOF II is not much more than a glorified, or should I say, gore-ified shooting gallery. It's not unlike "House of the Dead" only less exciting.
Gamer's Pulse
Combine a quickly aging game with a sloppy porting process and you have a lackluster game that can only claim high amounts of gore as a selling feature, although even that comes off flat.
Read Full Review >Gaming Age
Just when I thought I might be able to get back into the FPS mix, I feel like Im drowning in these poor games instead. Your best bet is to just stay away and wait for some originality to poke its head out.
Read Full Review >Eurogamer
Relentless FPS overlords might find their pulses raised briefly by the thought of endless, generic shooting and violence, but the rest of you would be well advised to direct your time and money elsewhere.
Read Full Review >Xbox Nation Magazine
This is as stock and uninteresting as it gets, nothing more than the staple prescripted key/switch hunt you've already seen 100 times. [Aug 2003, p.77]
What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this game is 6.0 (out of 10) based on 14 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Blue Falcon gave it a3:
This is the worst 1st person shooter I've ever played. The graphics are very sub par, but it's also really simple and boring.
Brian K. gave it a 9:
Great Game!!
Jay K. gave it a 5:
If you're looking for something to waste time with then you've found it. If your looking for a challange keep looking. Graphics are more than poor. Looks like something from the last generation of gaming systems. If you want to buy it rent it first.
Justin Opinion gave it a 9:
I'm really surprised on the reviews this title has received. That is until you noticed they are all slamming the single player mode. Multiplayer is where it really shines. Fast action, gunnin' and runnin' using modern weapons. Since August 03' there have been 4 new downloadable maps with all them being different and unique for some really fun shooting mayhem. The critics missed the mark in not giving more weight to the multiplayer aspects of this really addictive online game. My two cents.
Ned F. gave it a 4:
The first level is CHOPPY what the hell, it is an xbox game. i expected it would run like a pentium III at least, no it is a 486 with 16mb of ram the graphics are pretty bad for a next gen console. the only good part is shooting off your opponents limbs thats it.
XISMZERO gave it a 3:
It's like playing an N64 game - otherwise it's a bad port of a originally lousy game.
Tommi S. gave it an 8:
Dual-Uzi's rule, the graphics don't. Good fun, no Halo tho...
