- Studio: Fox Atomic
- Release Date: May 11, 2007
User Score
7.0
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 314 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 239 out of 314
-
Mixed: 26 out of 314
-
Negative: 49 out of 314
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SeanP.Oct 10, 200710Just to let everyone in on a secret. They are not zombies and that is why the father followed them. They are just real angry. Now actually watch the movie and don't go into it thinking this movie sucks because they didn't explain everything to me.
-
-
AnneW.Jun 8, 200710Excellent. I saw it a week ago and I;m still thinking about it. Definitely recommend it for anyone who likes suspense!
-
-
LarryBFeb 2, 201010
-
-
HelloYouOct 8, 200710
-
-
RyencokeMay 11, 200710This is how you make a sequel. One of the best most recent sequels to a movie I have ever seen. Aliens + Aliens = 28 Days Later + 28 Weeks Later. That's how I compare them. Such an awesome movie. Go see it.
-
-
StephenMMay 17, 200710
-
-
EmilyD.Jun 1, 200710Awesome movie, everything I expected and more.
-
-
BryanS.Oct 11, 200710This was an amazing movie.. like i could just picture another one. i hope they make one cause if the virus hit europe all of asia and africa would fall to and i could see giant barriers.
-
-
AndrewG.May 13, 200710Easily the best scary movie I've ever seen. Much much better than 28 Days Later.
-
-
ZachB.May 14, 20071028 Weeks is superb in the way it moves from Zombie film to allegory. There is a coldness and something that haunts the mind when you see the military occupation of ravaged London--now a city of the dead.
-
-
AdamP.May 18, 200710Brilliant film. Best I have seen in a while; so good it made my girlfriend walk out with her mate whilst me and my mate watched the fun.This film is for the ZOMBIE lovers. Dawn of the Dead this beats you 10000%.
-
-
AntonioR.May 25, 200710Amazing!
-
-
StevenDMay 27, 200710
-
-
MelissaC.Jun 12, 200710I think this would be my favorite movie of all times. I ended without nails and with the desire of bite everyone. I just wanted to run every where and yield. I just loved it.
-
-
AdamF.Jun 13, 200710Absolutely loved it. The movie was not only one of the most terrifying films out in recent history, but it also posed really twisted and sick moral dilemmas. Loved it.
-
-
NickM.Jan 20, 200810This movie will probably go down as a classic horror film. It is one of the scariest movies to date, and it had a classic moment a minute. It's biggest praise is its opening scene, one of the best in any movie ever.
-
-
AnthonyG.Oct 28, 20071028 weeks later was way better then days. i was shakeing during the whole movie. Its was amazing. if u haven't seen it, then go see it.
-
-
NikyB.May 11, 200710I was a HUGE fan of the first and I had high expectations of this one....IT DELIVERED!
-
-
JohnE.May 14, 200710Loved it. Bleak, brutal and grim - just how a good horror film should be.
-
-
WarmongerMay 17, 200710
-
-
TylerG.May 18, 200710One of the best movies of the year, one of the best suspense/horror movies I've ever seen, they're not zombies so Im not gonna say that, but it's just excellent it's great GO SEE IT NOW
-
-
equality7-2521May 19, 200710This was exhilarating. Amid the gore and the frenetic pace, there is some serious cinematic poetry. I loved this film. Ranks among the best films of the past year and a half. Not as good as Pan's Labyrinth, The Departed and V For Vendetta, but this filmmaker's future is bright.
-
-
AndreaD.May 25, 200710It was completely awesome and totally original and was better than the prequel. the effects were amazing. my hope is that there will be a third installment. It had every thing that a good zombie movie should have
-
-
DanLNov 27, 200910Absolutely phenomenal. I enjoy this movie considerably more than the first one. The acting was believable, and the special effects definitely worked to convey the gritty, horrific reality of the subject matter.
-
-
A.NonymousNov 15, 200710
-
-
Oct 3, 201110Another fantastic sequel. Everything is new, there are new "scares", and ways of doing so. The environment is completely amazing, the story itself captive as I said in criticism of the earlier film is a film that deserves a sequel. For all I know there will be a sequel that will be called 28 months later and is scheduled to launch in 2013.
-
ChristopherW.Oct 10, 20079
-
-
PatrickOct 22, 20079I've already seen this dvd multiple times since its release, and have loved it every time. Great zombie movie that is a complete departure from 28 Days Later (so stop comparing the two you imbeciles, they're hardly similar). The sheer terror and manner in which the virus effects all involved always draws me back.
-
-
ArthurC.May 24, 20079Somehow manages to not only top the first one, but be a thoroughly original horror movie to boot. Something you don't see in sequels these days.
-
-
ClareF.May 24, 20079I thought this was fantastic, the effects are amazing and had me sitting on the edge of my sit, the use of children is smart as people will sympathize with them, the best movie I've watched in a long time.
-
-
RyanP.Jun 1, 20079Great sequel, but some will say that the original is better. I like the action though, and the atmosphere is still tense throughout.
-
-
IrritatedOct 11, 20079Firstly! This is not a zombie movie! They are not zombies, they are infected with a virus! The victims do not die! And as for the person saying that the UK director was trying to say something political, does the name Juan Carlos Fresnadillo sound like an English name?! Secondly, this is a top notch movie!
-
-
JoshH.Oct 14, 20079I'm not sure what was so fantastic about 28 Days Later. A developed plot? Yeah, RIGHT. It starts out with a monkey that bites someone. The rage virus is let loose, causing everyone to go nuts! Yawn. Sounds a lot like the Umbrella virus from the Resident Evil games
-
-
AnnaP.May 12, 20079
-
-
BlancoAleguaMay 13, 20079
-
-
SeanW.May 14, 20079
-
-
BM.May 15, 20079Solid. If you liked the first, you like this one.
-
-
JustinC.May 16, 20079I'm not one for thrillers or horror movies, but this movie was pretty amazing. The first action scene was incredible with the horrible choice that Don had to make. Only outstanding flaw was how the dad could appear everywhere, mostly by himself.
-
-
KennethM.May 27, 20079Like the first movie, it combines absolute terror and panic with moral / ethical dilemmas. I love it.
-
-
JoeShmoMay 27, 20079In a word, "intense". Once in a great while a movie will grip me and not let go. This was one of those movies. Yeah, there are a few gaps and "yeah, right" moments, but they stayed around for about a second before I was enraptured again. I thought it captivating to the point that the end of the movie came much too quickly.
-
-
NikM.May 31, 20079
-
-
AdamMay 8, 20079Brutal... raw... frantic... an absolutely mindblowing sequel to a brilliant first movie. Puts nearly all the action/suspense movies of the past year to shame, only to be matched by Children of Men. A must see movie.
-
-
IsaacJun 3, 20079Excellent follow up to 28 Days Later. Very exciting, lots of gore, awesome. Left me completely satisfied.
-
-
JoshuaHMay 2, 20099Great film, Shows enough gore to make a horror movie yet creates enough suspense for a compelling thriller that you can't take your eyes off.The director masterfully builds suspense and excitement. Everything was well done from the camera work to the music cues.Good dialogue and great special effects. loved it.
-
-
JSNov 4, 20079
-
-
chadOct 18, 20079This movie took everything good in the first movie and brought it to the next level ( the infected, blood) and got rid of everything that wasn't good about the first (slow pace) to make for one awesome fast paced movie that had me thinking about it all day.
-
-
AntonioR.Oct 26, 20079Amazing!
-
-
K.O.May 11, 20079Solid solid sequal. Does not disappoint. The one zombie popping up over and over is a bit lame but over all quite excellent.
-
-
SonofsabuS.May 11, 20079The trailers weren't that exciting but I was really impressed with the film. First 5 minutes grabs you by the throat and the director does a good job keeping his foot on the gas throughout.
-
-
RobboMay 12, 20079This was an excellent horror/thriller movie. Does anyone know who/what the source of the score is?? -- that piece that plays over and over again, sounds familiar but not sure, would love to know what it is and get the music thereof.
-
-
PeterE.May 16, 20079Much better than the first one! This movie scared the devil out of me. I found myself almost scared to look at the screen... GREAT SCARY/ZOMBIE MOVIE. GO SEE IT.
-
-
MattN.May 21, 20079Very suspenseful and kept me on the edge of my seat the entire time.
-
-
MattAMay 28, 20079I loved this movie. It had emotional depth in characters driven on love and passion. The music fit the movie very well, and helped drive emotion. The movie was kinda depressing...and left an vague ending...but overall an adrenaline rush post-apocolyptic treat!
-
-
JasonJ.Jun 1, 20079
-
-
FaisalH.Sep 18, 20079
-
-
AlecB.May 11, 20079This iz by far the best horror movie in years.. very interesting, good plot, intense action, scary, danny boyle has surprised m3 with 28 days but i got more surprises by 28 weeks later.. great sequel.
-
-
DexterM.May 12, 20079Incredible cinematography, great performances, and tons of eye candy (all simultaneously combined with scares). A must-see for "zombie movie" fans and horror fans alike.
-
-
MatthewM.May 13, 20079
-
-
DanaS.May 16, 20079
-
-
TerryO.May 31, 20079Great portrayal of a worst-case infectious disease outbreak. Although some of the science/public health was a little off, for the most part it was outstanding. Outstanding cross between "Outbreak" and "Dawn of the Dead"!
-
-
RandyMOct 11, 2008928 Weeks Later is dark. Beyond dark. It's a movie lover's masochistic nightmare. But it's shocking, intelligent, and will leave you utterly exhausted by the time your finished watching it. The movie gives you almost no time to relax and cleverly instills a sense of panic throughout. Brilliantly concieved and more than worthy to sit among the few top-tier horror films.
-
-
Jun 1, 20119A fantastic sequel, it has a lot of tense moments, a lot of enjoyable new characters, my only complaints are that it starts of slow, and that the ending is a little confusing, but the atmosphere, and the jaw dropping moments make this a must seee for fans of the first movie.
-
Aug 13, 20129
-
Jan 20, 20139
-
BruceMay 12, 20078
-
-
MichaelS.Jun 8, 20078Solid, scary and completely absent of one second of humor, which is a good thing. Zombies are serious business and 28wl serves it up hot and exciting. Who will direct 28 Months Later??!!
-
-
MrSmithNov 17, 20078If you enjoyed the first you should enjoy this, I found the first to be more scary than this.
-
-
GaryJ.Oct 11, 20078Killing the Dead is Good.
-
-
jeffc.Oct 23, 20078I really dug it. Gritty, great music, well done!
-
-
AugustusS.May 11, 20078A lot better than I expected it to be. Very reminiscent of "Aliens" both in the kind of movie and in the levels of coolnes and quality. Scary, exciting, interesting.
-
-
SkylerW.May 30, 20078A very good sequel, but not beter than the original. While the plot doesn't really advance much in new ideas, the film's simplicity is overcome by good acting and exceptional directing. It also manages to sustain terror and suspense throughout, making it quite the exciting viewing experience.
-
-
JohnL.Jun 24, 20078Better than the original, 28 Weeks Later provides a new twist to the zombie genre by examining what happens after the initial insanity when society is trying to rebuild itself. The kids do a great job, and the ending is uncompromising to say the least.
-
-
MaxC.Sep 7, 20078
-
-
MarieMOct 25, 20078
-
-
NoxL.Oct 26, 20078
-
-
ChrisK.May 11, 20078
-
-
JakeB.May 11, 20078Great great stuff, lots of action and the movie feels like it's only 20 minutes long. Although the ending is somewhat predictable, the path that gets you there is not at all. This is one of the only movies I have ever seen in which the main characters are not sacred and are just as susceptible to death as the rest of the characters. Great movie over all and can't wait for the next one!
-
-
BillyS.May 13, 20078
-
-
MohanK.May 13, 20078Not quite as good as the original, 28 Weeks Later still packs a plenty of tense and frightening moments. Lots more great shots of a deserted London, too. Good show!
-
-
BenJ.May 14, 20078Better than the original? No. But still a great film, which is well worth watching. Scared me siilly!
-
-
JoeHMay 17, 20078
-
-
AramisG.May 11, 20078
-
-
TonyS.May 12, 20078Much Better then what I was expecting. True, there is a lot more gore in this film then the last. However, to my surprise it stayed real and never got cheesy. A Worthy Sequel!
-
-
LucyS.May 14, 20078Heart poundingly good 28 Weeks Later's slick combination of horror and reality that leaves you aware of how real horror is a combination of bad judgement and worse timing. With an even handed balance of hand held camera work and sophisticated special effects - the horror of humanity is never left. Resonates with you in a way that the slasher films of the last two years never do. Outstanding.
-
-
RyanT.May 15, 20078Great sequel. I thought the edits and camera works was a bit too fast for my taste, but that's just being picky.
-
-
MattLMay 28, 20078Very much different than the first movie, but just as good. The opening is extremely intense, leaving you sitting on the tip of your chair waiting nervously for London to fall apart once again. Some pretty cool cinematography as well. The creepy, stalkerish zombie-dad was kinda stupid, but it didn't take away that much from the movie. Definitely worth seeing, especially in theaters.
-
-
AaronF.May 28, 20078Very good, best horror sequel I can ever recall seeing. There are issues: overuse of shaky camera, one too many appearances by father character, and lack of proper ending; but this is by far the most genuinely thrilling and scary movie I've seen in years.
-
-
PaulK.Jun 15, 20078I thought this was going to be rehash, but after seeing the reviews, I took a chance. In some ways this is predictable, but the plot device that fuels the story and the potential for sequels is plausible and a great direction to go with this franchise. The very last scene should have been edited out, since the subtle and more effective cliffhanger had already been established.
-
-
Aug 24, 20108
-
Jan 16, 20118A terrific movie dealing with the moral problem of utilitarianism: sacrifice a few to save many?
-
Jan 9, 20118
-
Jul 3, 20118I'd say 28 weeks later takes what 28 days later did and does it a slight bit better. Again, like it's prequel it's an amazing horror/zombie flick, definitely worth a watch!
-
ColbyS.May 12, 20077Jarring and unpleasant, but still a good movie. The critics were wrong about it surpassing the first one, though, as this one lacks the sense of isolation that made 28 Days Later so effective.
-
-
RobertI.Jun 3, 20077Really scary vision of a dystopia.
-
-
FXTJun 5, 20077
-
-
BretG.May 14, 20077Horrifying. Some scenes are ridiculously brutal, bloody and terrifying. The acting isn't bad but its not award winning. The scenario in which 28 Weeks creates seems believable with the US Army losing control and it is 100 times better then 28 Days. This movie isn't bad, but it's not the best film thus far.
-
-
ChadS.May 16, 20077
-
-
AriSTIdesZMay 17, 20077
-
-
RichardH.May 20, 20077A pretty entertaining but shallow affair. Some genuine frights, some cheap frights, a dodgy unrealistic plot but it is a Zombie film afterall... so it can probably be let off for that, kind of fell into the cliché of trying to get every single London landmark it could into the film. Ultimately a bit too dumb to be as satisfying as the original.
-
-
PaulMay 23, 20077Pretty scary, but it's a horror movie so that's good. A better than I expected but some really dumb parts where you just want to ask the characters "hey, are you retarded or something???" like the underground part with the night-vision. Stop looking at the wall and look for some zombies!!! but overall a good horror movie.
-
-
80Blistering and nihilistic--a vision to reduce you to a puddle of despair.
-
80Bigger action, more amazing deserted (and devastated) London sequences and biting contemporary relevance, if a touch less heart than the original.
-
50"28 Days Later," while not terribly original, was suspenseful and involving. 28 Weeks Later is neither. The characters aren't as sympathetic or interesting.