Metascore
43

Mixed or average reviews - based on 24 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 3 out of 24
  2. Negative: 3 out of 24
  1. Reviewed by: James Berardinelli
    Jul 30, 2012
    63
    It is disappointing (and a little boring). The chief problem relates to structure. The film unspools more like a puzzle than a cohesive narrative.
  2. Reviewed by: Owen Gleiberman
    Aug 1, 2012
    75
    360 has a circular structure that's deftly pleasing, though the human drama is just facile enough to make it seem, in the end, a little too much like connect the dots played with people.
  3. Reviewed by: Peter Rainer
    Aug 3, 2012
    42
    Morgan is a wonderful writer when he's working from the headlines, but his "personal" movies, like "Hereafter" and this one, release a bleary, pseudo-profound aspect of his talent that's best left in the dark.
  4. 50
    To their credit, both Meirelles and his cast infuse as much realism into the artifice as they can muster, but it's not nearly enough. The too-neat script boxes them in, and leave us out. In that sense, 360 doesn't so much connect our shrunken world as strangle the life from it – the circle feels like a noose.
  5. Reviewed by: Andrew O'Hehir
    Aug 2, 2012
    40
    It's easy to hate movies that are abundantly terrible or immoral or stupid, but I almost feel like a jerk telling you that Fernando Meirelles' globetrotting drama 360 is a mistake from beginning to end.
  6. Reviewed by: Kyle Smith
    Aug 3, 2012
    25
    A sort of "Babel" of bonking, 360 gives us much in the way of international anguish, frustrated coupling and longing stares, but there's very little plausibility or genuine emotion in its egregiously contrived story of ardor gone amiss.
  7. Reviewed by: Joe Neumaier
    Aug 2, 2012
    60
    The reason director Fernando Meirelles' intimate drama 360 succeeds where other adaptations of Arthur Schnitzler's 1897 sexual circle-back play "La Ronde" haven't is, ironically, because it puts less emphasis on body heat and more on intellectual coolness.
  8. Reviewed by: Manohla Dargis
    Aug 2, 2012
    40
    There's no way to know what went wrong with 360 and whether it was this uninvolving and shallow from the start.
  9. Reviewed by: Kirk Honeycutt
    Jul 20, 2012
    60
    La Ronde 2011-style is simply a game and its makers expert gamesmen. The film is never less than intriguing. But the artifice shows all too clearly.
  10. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    Aug 6, 2012
    50
    No scene lasts more than a few minutes, but the overall is effect is being subjected to 105 mins. of YouTube vignettes that someone has chosen. 360 is probably best appreciated or endured on a long flight similar to the one Hopkins takes in the movie.
  11. Reviewed by: Marc Mohan
    Aug 30, 2012
    50
    As the action moves from Vienna to Paris to London to Denver to Phoenix and then back again, the vignettes blur into one another.
  12. Reviewed by: Keith Uhlich
    Jul 31, 2012
    40
    Scene by scene, you want to laugh at all the ham-fisted kismet, even if the committed cast holds your attention. Hopkins is especially good in his chaste May-September interactions with Flor, and he has an AA confessional that is genuinely moving.
  13. Reviewed by: Nick Pinkerton
    Jul 31, 2012
    40
    There are fleeting moments, but Morgan's narrative promiscuity leaves 360 feeling only spread out and empty.
  14. Reviewed by: Amy Biancolli
    Aug 9, 2012
    50
    Much like its own characters, it dithers too much - and it dares too little.
  15. Reviewed by: Ella Taylor
    Aug 6, 2012
    65
    Meirelles, who made the exciting "City of God" and "The Constant Gardener," has visual flair to burn. But he's less comfortable with inner lives than he is with feverish physical motion, and though the film is meant as a meditation on love and the post-modern psyche, it's shot like a thriller.
  16. Reviewed by: Cory Everett
    Jul 31, 2012
    58
    If the film had not been afraid to go a little darker (like its sexually frank opening), dig a little deeper, and develop its characters beyond their stereotypes, it would have been a much stronger effort.
  17. Reviewed by: Stephanie Merry
    Aug 16, 2012
    38
    If nothing else, the movie reminds filmgoers just how difficult it can be to pull off the multi-thread approach. Sometimes it's possible to take a spool of yarn and, with care and consistency, knit a stunning creation. 360 looks more like what happens when a cat gets ahold of the ball.
  18. Reviewed by: Philip Wilding
    Aug 6, 2012
    40
    A great disappointment by the "City Of God" man's high standards.
  19. Reviewed by: Bilge Ebiri
    Aug 3, 2012
    40
    How odd then that a film all about human connections manages to make none of its own.
  20. Reviewed by: Sheri Linden
    Aug 2, 2012
    40
    Hopkins' character is the most fully realized in the movie, complete with a monologue that the actor makes work, even if its carpe diem message-mongering is as unconvincing as most everything else in 360.
  21. Reviewed by: Alison Willmore
    Aug 1, 2012
    58
    Fittingly for its occasional ring imagery, 360 is hollow in the middle.
  22. Reviewed by: R. Kurt Osenlund
    Aug 1, 2012
    38
    Directed by Fernando Meirelles from a dusty script by Peter Morgan, 360 is all superficial stimulation, hollow and stiff as it beats the dead horse of we're-all-connected narratives.
  23. Reviewed by: Matt Mueller
    Jul 30, 2012
    40
    Banal, blundering and at times downright ludicrous, 360 is a full-circle misfire that Meirelles' lively images can't salvage.
  24. Reviewed by: Peter Debruge
    Jul 20, 2012
    40
    With a multilingual cast of mostly unfamiliar faces, plus a few stars, 360 feels too abstract, orchestrating break-ups and hook-ups in a passionless vacuum.
User Score
5.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 12 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 3
  2. Negative: 0 out of 3
  1. Oct 16, 2013
    6
    Some movies with seemingly connecting stories about central themes may succeed, like Pulp Fiction, but 360 doesn't seem to live up to that completely. The whole movie is like a dozen or so separate stories intertwined into one motion picture, so I can't judge the whole movie as a whole. Instead, I will go through each one:

    My favorite storyline in this movie was the one with Sergei and the woman he rides with in his car. I really felt for him as his abusive boss sleeps with hookers, bosses him around, and gives him no respect, because all Sergei could really do was watch and act polite so that he won't get fired. The woman in his car symbolizes his escape from all this, the start to a new life, in which Sergei can be happy. She makes him smile and both seem to like each other. Once Sergei drove off with her, all was right with the world and I couldn't help but smile.

    The storyline with the Algerian man (Jamel Debbouze) and the woman he loved was intriguing but never fully captured my attention. When he decided to solve the problem of his urgings, I was both sad and mad with how he handled it, and wished it could've ended differently. But, that's the way life works.

    Jude Law and Rachel Weisz's storyline seemed pointless to elaborate on. It connected with the other storylines, and was a crucial link to pull the stories together, but it wasn't interesting at all.

    The storyline with the sex offender and Lara had a good ending and a lesson learned, but it was kind of stupid. Would a woman be *that* naïve to let a man into her hotel room without any knowing who he was? A hookup at a bar is one thing, but hooking up with a random man at the airport who acts suspicious and is unwilling to go to any hotel room is plain stupid and foolish. To add to that, he is a recently released sex offender! While she obviously didn't know he was a sex offender, she didn't know who the man was to begin with, and that plot point was desperate and unrealistic.

    Anthony Hopkins' quest to find his daughter was very well done, and I loved this storyline. His interactions with Lara were realistic and excellently written.

    The story of the two hookers at the beginning was unsettling and unsatisfying. It was realistic, but the depth on which the movie pursued them was unnecessary.

    There were many other stories that happened, but the ones I mentioned were my favorites, and the others I didn't mention seemed like filler.

    Overall, the script in this movie was wonderful, but some of the stories were weak and some were excellent, so some stuck out while others didn't. One big thing about this movie is how realistic it was. Nothing in it seemed to good to be true, except maybe the story with Lara. This movie was basically about human interaction and the consequences following it. It showed how everything in life is connected somehow. In fact, the whole movie seemed to be about people meeting and interacting with each other as they are sad in their own lives because of a cheating husband, abusive boss, etc. That is the main theme, and it is presented well and repetitively.
    Full Review »
  2. Nov 18, 2012
    4
    Like the film Eyes Wide Shut, which was based on Arthur Schnitzler's Traumnovelle, 360 is another weird adaptation of an Arthur Schnitzler work. Schnitzler's play, La Ronde (also known as Reigen in German) is set in 1890's Vienna and focuses on the bizarre hypocrisy necessary to maintain the proper veneer required by polite society in regard to the rules of marriage, fidelity, and sexual propriety. Schnitzler's work comprises a full circle, like the children's ring-around-the-rosie dance for which the play is named. In the original play, a prostitute has sex with a soldier; the soldier has sex with a maid, the maid with a young gentleman, the gentleman with a young wife, and then the young wife with her husband. The liaisons are empty and devoid of any commitment or romantic attachment, except for the husband who tries to explain to his wife how going through periods of "friendship" keeps the relationship fresh so that they keep revisiting the honeymoon stage. Then the husband takes up with a young girl, the girl with a poet, the poet with an actress, the actress with a count , and the count comes full circle and has sex with the prostitute. The pairings are absurd, they cross class boundaries and are strictly based on animalistic sexual needs, which somehow justify lies and hypocrisy. La Ronde makes a perfect circle; 360, set in modern times in Vienna, Bratislava, and Denver should make a perfect circle mathematically speaking, but in this film it's more like a rectangle missing one side. The top of the hierarchy is the husband and wife played by Rachel Weisz and Jude Law, two famous British actors who barely make their presence felt in this film. Each one of them starts a chain of sexual deceit--the husband (Jude Law) almost hires a prostitute but bolts at the last minute, the prostitute mates with a Russian mafia-style boss, her sister falls in love with the boss's driver, whose wife is enjoying a flirtation with her boss, a dentist. The wife and the dentist never get together and the chain ends with them. Back at the top of the hierarchy, the wife, played by Rachel Weisz, is having an affair with a Brazilian photographer, whose girlfriend finds out and leaves him to go back to Brazil. En route, she befriends a grieving father of a missing child (Anthony Hopkins) and nearly goes to bed with a rehabilitated sex convict, just out of jail and a little shaky about his self-control. Nothing happens and the chain ends there. The stories are disconnected and rambling. The high point is Hopkins pouring his heart out at an AA meeting, effective but entirely out of place. 360 claims to be based on La Ronde, but the connection is so vague that I don't think they should reference Schnitzler's work--there's no resemblance whatsoever. This modern version is completely lacking in the absurdity, spontaneity, and the revolutionary zeal needed to thoroughly rebel against society's expectations. There is a hint of a philosophical theme in the form of the Kierkegaardian crowd as seen at bus terminals and airports in the film, perhaps denoting that the sexual defiance is a desperate attempt to be an individual and avoid the conformity and anonymity that the crowd imposes. The acting is so-so all around (save Hopkins), but the cinematography is impressive and creates an artsy, European ambience. Full Review »
  3. Nov 10, 2012
    5
    Oh boy, what is more fun than a choppy vignette movie, filmed in multiple languages, and on two continents? I like cinema because it allows me to escape from everyday life. I am not interested in trying to decipher a multi-lingual chess match poorly played. Full Review »