- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
80Hartnett's pitch-perfect sexual panic can be hilariously funny.
-
80Can be taken as a mildly risque frothy date movie, but there's serious subtext for those who choose to look beneath surface sheen.
-
80It's very funny, terrifically lively and, considering how awful it might have been, surprisingly tender in its portrait of a young guy who learns sensitivity the hard way.
-
80It's funny! It's not Shakespeare's "Twelfth Night" or anything, but it's pretty darned good!
-
80This is smooth and at times even sensual -- a well-oiled machine.
-
75Hartnett shows here a breezy command of his charming, likable character. It is a reminder of his talent and versatility.
-
75The quality writing, delivered by likable Hartnett and his talented co-stars, makes up for the sometimes flat production. A richly humorous background is provided by well-played eccentric minor characters.
-
70A self-described abstinence comedy that is funny, sexy and silly in equal measure.
-
70The movie is both exhilarating and depressing. The trouble is, I can't figure out which is more important.
-
67A kinder, gentler teensploitation comedy, but Hartnett's Matt, at least, invites the audience to graduate to something better.
-
67Mostly fun to watch, buoyed by some strong dialogue and performances by the supporting cast.
-
63A curious entry in the current wave of raunchy youth comedies. It's refreshingly free of scatological humor, but even while aiming higher, it can't raise its focus above the belt.
-
63Within a certain narrow range, Hartnett shows some comic flair -- though not enough to carry the picture over its considerable rough spots.
-
60Any romantic comedy that lacks Meg Ryan can’t be faulted too hard.
-
60Yup, director Michael Lehmann, far from the glory days of "Heathers," has made a movie about a hard-on, in which he relentlessly pounds a flaccid premise.
-
60Runs more smoothly and stylishly than the average teen comedy.
-
50This pretty but witless movie is well-produced, slickly directed -- full of jokes about hot dudes and hot babes pitched right at the "American Pie" crowd.
-
50It's rare that a movie is so graceful and so gross.
-
Builds up comic force in its first half. But then it blows it, leaving the audience feeling unsatisfied.
-
50The film's biggest problem, however, is its naive inability to understand that sex comedies, to amuse, must be about more than sex.
-
50If you're desperate to give something up for Lent, make it movies like this one.
-
50All this holding back is a bad idea, especially as the subject of an entire movie.
-
50Eventually becomes cliched, predictable and crude. And that's a real sin.
-
50This is a smart and witty romantic farce that mixes sweet and sexy with surprising aplomb.
-
50Strictly for boys -- grown-up boys -- the more boyish and less grown-up the better.
-
50Sets out to demonstrate that life is about more than having sex. Inadvertently -- I think -- it ends up showing us just the opposite. As if we didn't already know.
-
50Even Hartnett, designated Next Big Thing last year, seems like he's barely trying.
-
40Doesn't do much to further distinguish Lehmann's career. As for those of us waiting for the year's first worthwhile date movie, the wait continues.
-
40Roughly splits the difference between "Six Days, Seven Nights" and "9 1/2 Weeks." Which is something like the nth-order derivative of an infinite regression.
-
40Mildly amusing but wholly unnecessary comedy.
-
30It's too mild to be crass; it's clumsy. Lehmann has made what amounts to an anti-sex sex comedy, the first youth sex comedy made to be enjoyed by those creepy abstinence teens.
-
30The sensibility of the movie is naggingly adolescent -- less erotic than squeamish and giggly. [11 Mar 2002, p. 92]
-
0So eyeball-gougingly awful that you're tempted to give up movies for Lent.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 25 out of 29
-
Mixed: 0 out of 29
-
Negative: 4 out of 29
-
This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view.