- Studio: Universal Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 21, 2001
User Score
7.5
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 206 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 165 out of 206
-
Mixed: 14 out of 206
-
Negative: 27 out of 206
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Mar 31, 201310i'ts great i dont know why the critic's are bad with this movie.
-
Mar 24, 20135Slow and steady does not win this race depicting the troubles of John Nash's struggles with schizophrenia while working hard on his scientific work
-
Mar 8, 20134That was boring. A Beautiful Mind is to fall asleep.
True story, whatever. This movie don't convey this story good. All the time the viewer must have pity.How awful. I hate such pity-movies. In the matter of schizophrenia I prefer Fight Club. -
Dec 10, 20126
-
Mar 27, 201210This was by far wonderful movie. Not only did it give the reality of the 'sane' characters, but it gave a reality to a schizophrenic so that you don't even know he is one until half way through the movie. A success in every way. More movies should be this bold.
-
Jan 29, 20123too conventional and too sweet considering that it's about an unconventional life of a genius mathematician. certainly not the best of 2001 ( a great year for movies).
-
Jan 22, 201210
-
Oct 9, 20115Through "A Beautiful Mind", neither director Ron Howard or actor Russell Crowe understand what to actually do in this dull film. The lead and tone is tedious and mediocre, with absolutely 0% of plot twists.
-
Aug 31, 201110The Idea of this film was so brilliant, so spectacular, so amazing, i just can't stop qualifying this film in the best ways possible. Russell Crowe (I still think he was better then Denzel Washington, but that's just my opinion) & Jennifer Connelly tear the whole film down, they were fantastic, 2 of the best performances that I ever saw. This is without a doubt Ron Howard masterpiece.
-
Aug 26, 201110
-
Jul 3, 20119What can you say? Amazing film. For me, however, it doesn't deserve the 10 points because after the first two thirds of the film it kind of lost me. Yet, it's well directed and Crowe shows amazing acting.
-
Mar 4, 20118A very good movie but can be a little to heavy. Slow paced but worth watching.
-
Feb 22, 20118A great cast and a superb script help the story of Nash's troubled mind become an exhilarating and mesmerising experience that will be hard to forget. First class!
-
Jan 7, 201110This was truly a moving movie due to some superb acting. Crowe is so spot on with his character that at times it is almost frightening. Jennifer Connelly and Ed Harris are also wonderful (Harris being a blatant Oscar snub). A great supporting cast and score. To all the people who hated it because not everything was accurate: IT WAS A MOVIE IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE 100% ACCURATE!!!!!!
-
Jan 5, 201110it's a classic. i love the story. i usually don't like Russell, but in this movie is great. the movie shows the fight with a particular disease. the society is usually rejecting these kind of people.
-
Dec 18, 20107Bravo performance by Crowe.. yet again. Nicely directed and interesting storyline. Much better than average movie and one you will watch again every so often on TV - true test of a good movie imo lol.
-
Oct 30, 20109
-
Aug 23, 20108Maths genius, big career ahead of him, goes to work for the government or maybe he doesn't, schizophrenia, Nobel Peace Prize.
Ron Howard's brilliant film about John Nash with a great performance by Russell Crowe & also a very good & strong supporting cast.
The whole schizophrenia thing is done very well to the point where you really feel for the main character. -
ZoranDSep 13, 20098
-
-
ChristopherPJan 23, 20090
-
-
R.LopezJan 14, 200910
-
-
JerryM.Dec 1, 20066Oh, please. People are rating this movie a 10, placing it in the company of the Godfather, Citizen Kane etc? Formulaic but intriguing.
-
-
TerryA.Oct 13, 200610I personally think that this is one of Ron Howard
-
-
FranzF.Aug 12, 200610Best film ever. invidual. awsome.
-
-
TinaB.Jul 22, 20061Sugar-coated, inaccurate and manipulative drivel that is only rescued from the depths of utter unwatchability by Connely's stand-out performance.
-
-
HamidM.Jul 17, 200610This movie is modern classic - extremely well put together. For metacritic to attract only a 72, alongside slash and beat movies, shows that this place is frequented by the wrong crowds. Something is broken with metacritic to give this a 72, IMO.
-
-
StevenJun 21, 20061072? Some of these critics honestly don't know shit, this is one of the most powerful, captivating and interesting drama movies you can see, the acting and the story is very involving, the movies soundtrack is just bliss, I could watch this film over and over and over, by the way Ed Harris is great in this film, its true.
-
-
KimM.Mar 4, 200610This is only a split second of the life of John Nash, and I can only try to imagine how his life has been for him, and for his family. But the movie did its finest work there. It might not tell the hole truth, but it is what you want to tell the viewers, that is important here, a hint about a very special life of a genious.
-
-
MiN.Mar 4, 200610
-
-
GustavoH.R.Jan 17, 20068
-
-
MarceloV.Jan 3, 200610This movie is about the power of love, i think no body really get it, more satisfactory than a beautiful mind is finding a beautilful love.
-
-
NovinG.Dec 7, 200510It's sweet as hell. Russel Crowe is the man.
-
-
MarkJ.Mar 5, 20054Boring, Oscar type movie.
-
-
AustinR.Aug 9, 20045Crowe's full frontal nudity was ace! otherwise booooring!
-
-
AkhilK.Jul 10, 20049Beatuiful filmed and wonderfully performed by Russel Crowe, Paul Bettany and Ed Harris. Although I thought Jennifer Connelly was there for there for the "woman" effect. Excellent nonetheless.
-
-
PatC.Jan 10, 20042I used to think the life of a geek was unbelievably dull, hardly better than a Hollywood cliche. I was wrong. But the sequel about Connelly's Dependent Personality Disorder should be riveting.
-
-
EthanNov 24, 20031Abysmally played out and perhaps the most manipulative film about a psychological disorder ever made. Quite simply, the worst film of the year.
-
-
YoonMinC.Oct 14, 20038
-
-
RaeganOct 7, 200310
-
-
JosieJul 23, 20032Worse that it won Best Screenplay than Best Picture. What a horrible film this is. It completely trashes the novel and turns it into Hollywood drivel. A catastrophic mess.
-
-
AmyJul 23, 20033An unintentional comedy. The story is so contrived that it crosses into hilarity. i was laughing at all the wrong moments. How this film actually got any positive reviews is beyond me. It's simply a disaster. A preposterous disaster.
-
-
T.K.Apr 26, 20038A fairly good movie, but not a film that I would watch more than 2 or 3 times. Crowe was good, but not award-worthy. He simply just made the character believable. Connelley's performance deserved the Oscar and Ed Harris also did a good job. The twists worked quite well too. All in all, a good movie, but not something I would crown a "Best Picture" to.
-
-
JohnJan 9, 20032Actually, despite some reviews below, Crowe most definitely did not deserve the Oscar. Of those nominated, it belonged to Denzel. However, I would have much rather seen it go to Guy Pearce for Memento or Gene Hackman for The Royal Tenenbaums. This movie is one pretentious mess, from start to finish. I hated it.
-
-
ElliotDec 31, 20023
-
-
JeremyMarks-PeltzNov 14, 20029The way a biopic should be made with balanced attention on the strengths and weaknessess of the main character while not sensalitionizing the disease.
-
-
JamieW.Sep 1, 20025What I can't believe are the people who have slated this movie. Sure its Holywood, but then its an attempt at demystify Schizophrenia. As I am myself diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia I think this film does nothing but good. As to Stephanie.H's statement about the love of a good woman...my wife has been a tower of strength to me during my recovery.
-
-
ZachP.Aug 28, 20027Sure, it's sad and based on real peple, but Beautiful it is not. The twists are fun, but Crowe is no Denzel Washington, and this could not have been the best of the last year.
-
-
ArianaM.Aug 24, 20025
-
-
StephanieH.Aug 12, 20020This movie will probably offend anyone who's dealt with schizophrenia. It childishly suggests this devastating disease can be conquered if you just set your mind to it and have the love of a "good woman".
-
-
EricS.Aug 10, 20029
-
-
LeonardL.Aug 2, 20020No one who has read the book, or knows the truth about Nash's life, or about schizophrenia, can endorse or enjoy this bogus bloat of a movie.
-
-
BangkokDaveJul 29, 20029Yes, Ron Howard shamefully white-washed John Nash's life - but the film still told a great story. And yes, Russel Crowe is an a..hole - but he still did a stupendous job in the starring role. He deserved the Oscar without question - and as everyone knows, only politics prevented him from getting it.
-
-
PaulinaG.Jul 22, 20029This is a must! It is intelligent and makes us feel and see what the mind of the character. The kind a movie you see once, think a lot about it and then see it another time.
-
-
LisaG.Jul 21, 20021
-
-
RichardJul 15, 20026Crowe's mannered but obviously heartfelt performance is almost upstaged by Paul Bettany's natural charisma. Somewhere in the last 20 minutes the film takes a turn for the obvious, and too bad because it was fascinating for a bit.
-
-
NikkiJul 11, 20027It was good..i mean okay i guess. It definitely did not deserve THAT many Oscars!
-
-
RosieK.Jun 29, 20028This film is very sentimental and a provokative story of a young mathematician. The actors are great, but some points are portrayed poorly.
-
-
MaryJoM.Jun 29, 20023Russell Crowe was wonderful but this was a totally Hollywood product, giving us a fictionalized version of the real story, cleaning up the uglier details. This film certainly did not deserve the Oscar. And how did Ron Howard let that awful make up job on Jennifer Connelly as an old woman end up on film.
-
-
ThomasS.May 24, 20022
-
-
SteveM.May 12, 20027This movie beat out Lord of the Rings!!!
-
-
PatB.May 1, 20028As I walked into this movie I thought it was going to be another encredibly boring film that critics like because it could be a shread different from other films wich doen't make it better. Instead it had an amazing plot and interesting twists and for Russel Crowe's performance it just proves that all good actors come from Australia.
-
-
MichaelC.Apr 8, 200210
-
-
DeeA.Apr 1, 20022
-
-
ArnoldC.Mar 25, 20021Beautiful Mind is "Rain Man" and "Dead Poets Society" all in one. This is not a true story, it is not John Nash's life - forget the facts, it is Hollywood looking for an oscar, a formula Ron Howard knows well. Total wimsical bollocks.
-
-
GeorgeA.Mar 25, 20021I'll give this movie one point - Russell Crowe's acting was the only thing keeping me in the theater. Otherwise, this is just Hollywood manipulating the tiny minds of middle America once again.
-
-
JackS.Mar 23, 20024
-
-
RichardB.Mar 8, 20029
-
-
MasonC.Mar 4, 20020This is the worst film I've ever seen.
-
-
MarcK.Mar 3, 200210The best film of 2001. I definitely agree with Richard Schickel...this film was mainstream moviemaking at its highest, most satisfying level. Crowe and Connelly both deserve Oscars.
-
-
RobertH.Feb 23, 20025Just an okay movie with a great deal of hype. I would not want to see it again. See it if you have nothing better to do.
-
-
M.CareyFeb 16, 20027
-
-
JacquesS.Feb 15, 20020What a pile of drivel!
-
-
RodT.Feb 14, 20028Great Film. I'd put it in the top 5.
-
-
GordonK.Feb 12, 20020As a drama: 0 As a comedy: 10. One of the most hilariously over-acted, pretentious films in years. Great to watch while drunk.
-
-
JanineS.Feb 9, 200210Wonderful movie with superior perfomances by Crowe and Connelly.
-
-
ElliotJan 25, 20020I have lost all faith in the Golden GLobes. Whoever gives them the most money gets the globe. The oscars are similar, but they are not influenced by money as much. "Mulholland Drive" and "LOTR" and "In the Bedroom" were SO much better than this heap of crap that I can't even believe it. In a perfect world, "Mulholland Drive" would win everything.
-
-
JosephJan 21, 20023Crowe should not win for his performance. It stunk. If anyone deserves the best actor nod come Oscar time, it's Guy Pearce for Memento - not Crowe in his ridiculously overblown performance.
-
-
JohnM.Jan 21, 20023
-
-
DennisL.Jan 13, 20029It was pretty good--after a rocky start, it became really engrossing, with a tug at the heart that wasn't mush--simply touching. Good going, Russell & Ron.
-
-
EdM.Jan 12, 20028The movie kinda struggled the first 40 minutes, but it's all tied together. R.crowe did a supperb job. He's the front runner for another Oscar. Good film, well worth the price of admission.
-
-
SimpsonS.Jan 2, 200210An amazing movie. Simply put - you walk away from the movie with a smile.
-
-
BarbaraA.Jan 2, 200210The best I have ever seen.
-
-
TonyJan 2, 20028
-
-
KirstenDec 31, 20019Yes, there is some shameless heart-tugging in this movie, but it's worth it. As Chad S. says, just give in to the movie--you can't possibly not be moved and inspired.
-
-
[Anonymous]Dec 30, 200110Excellent movie about devotion, fear, love, strength. Thought provoking. After you've seen it, think about your own illusions v. realities and determining which is which.
-
-
ReubenD.Dec 29, 200110Works on every level. Fine writing and directing. Clean, mature, adult filmaking. You have to be moved. See it!!
-
-
ChadS.Dec 26, 20019Put aside your petty (but warranted) prejudices against Ron Howard and allow yourself to love this film. Forget the "Grinch." Forget "EdTv." Forget the liberties taken with the source material. And you will feel something.
-
-
LynnDec 26, 20019Several movies in one, with a "Sixth Sense"-like progression. Gives great insight to what paranoid schizophrenia must feel like.
-
-
RyanM.Dec 26, 200110
-
-
70Howard, and the screenwriter, Akiva Goldsman, have used the book as nothing more than their jumping-off point for an erratic work of fiction that's part mystery thriller and part Hollywood schmaltz.
-
50Instead of an originally conceived movie that reflects Nash's troubled but brilliant mind, we have one of those formulaically rendered Important Subject movies -- the kind that seem exclusively designed for Best Picture nominations.
-
80As Nash gets closer to Crowe's own age (and level of dissipation), the performance settles down and becomes first credible and then overwhelming. This is a stupendous piece of acting.