Metascore
73

Generally favorable reviews - based on 19 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 19
  2. Negative: 0 out of 19
Watch On
  1. Reviewed by: Robbie Collin
    Jul 5, 2013
    100
    Wheatley’s extraordinary film shakes you back and forth with a rare ferocity, but the net result is stillness.
  2. Reviewed by: Andrew O'Hehir
    Feb 6, 2014
    90
    On a more fundamental level this hilarious, disgusting, brilliant and circular psychotronic odyssey is a blast from the submerged past.
  3. Reviewed by: Alan Scherstuhl
    Feb 4, 2014
    90
    It's sweaty, disorienting, thrilling. Rarely has a narrative feature so marvelously integrated a sequence of experimental filmmaking, and that sequence alone guarantees A Field in England should thrive on the midnight circuit.
  4. Reviewed by: Marc Savlov
    Feb 5, 2014
    89
    In many ways, A Field in England is a funhouse mirror of audience expectations and something of a filmic Rorschach test.
  5. Reviewed by: Jessica Kiang
    Jul 8, 2013
    83
    The film is the most formally experimental, and probably the least approachable, of the director's titles to date. But it's further proof of Wheatley's singular sensibilities as a filmmaker.
User Score
7.8

Generally favorable reviews- based on 8 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 1
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 1
  3. Negative: 0 out of 1
  1. Feb 7, 2014
    10
    If this movie was in color it would be better. If the budget had of allowed for some more special effects ( not cgi necessarily but like atIf this movie was in color it would be better. If the budget had of allowed for some more special effects ( not cgi necessarily but like at least ONE supernatural/psychedelic experience). Showing 'something' in the hole woulda been fun and then a clearer ending. Full Review »