Metascore
42 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 20 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 20
  2. Negative: 7 out of 20
  1. Reviewed by: Michael Esposito
    75
    It's better than some James Bond movies--no matter what your age.
  2. Despite a relatively paltry $40 million budget, Stormbreaker has the sheen and special effects of a Bond movie, and the ambition as well.
  3. Taken for what it is - 'tweenage escapism - Stormbreaker is moderately fun.
  4. Though the film is not terribly original (and features a jarringly miscast Alicia Silverstone as Alex's nanny), the action scenes are diverting, the veteran cast is amusing and the engaging Pettyfer makes a solid debut.
  5. 63
    For kids strung out on Anthony Horowitz's 007-lite adventure series, this maiden adaptation is a pleasant enough diversion from having to flip the pages.
  6. Reviewed by: Joshua Katzman
    60
    The nonstop action in this British romp should ensure that its target audience, sugar-buzzed prepubescent boys, stay strapped in their seats.
  7. 50
    Sax keeps things moving, but the best thing about the film is the British cast.
  8. Reviewed by: Gregory Kirshling
    50
    Alex Rider: Operation Stormbreaker is "Agent Cody Banks" played British and kinda straight -- that is, as straight as you can when your villain, who dispatches foes with a giant jellyfish, is played by a toothpick-chomping Mickey Rourke in purple eye shadow.
  9. 50
    Mr. Pettyfer is no Sean Connery, no Roger Moore, no Pierce Brosnan, no Timothy Dalton and no George Lazenby even, but the director, Geoffrey Sax, compensates for his zero of a hero by indulging the exceedingly amused and amusing supporting cast.
  10. 50
    Rourke's hammy, eyeliner-enhanced acting alone almost makes Alex Rider worth a look.
  11. A lame and disappointing affair.
  12. Reviewed by: Mark Olsen
    40
    The film is forever trying to balance between being for younger teenagers and keeping their parents occupied as well, and never quite gets it right.
  13. 38
    This lame teenage James Bond will leave audiences neither shaken nor stirred.
  14. A British flick based on the first novel in a popular teenage spy-thriller series by Anthony Horowitz, looks promising but, unfortunately, doesn't measure up.
  15. Reviewed by: Luke Y. Thompson
    30
    It's ostensibly an action movie, and the action is so poorly shot as to be embarrassing.
  16. Reviewed by: Derek Elley
    30
    A shake 'n' bake Brit teen-spy actioner, without a smidgeon of originality, humor or involving characterization, Stormbreaker is a high-profile bust.
  17. Perhaps as a publishing phenomenon the concept works, but on-screen it's pretty dull, with good actors in bad roles and bad special effects.
  18. While it's filled with quality actors, this James Bond tale for tweens feels like something you should be getting for free on television.
  19. About as clunky as a movie gets. It lurches from scene to scene with no sense of narrative grace, gives its roster of prominent actors nothing to work with and screeches to a halt with all the grace of a sprinter whose shoelaces have been tied together.
User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 19 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 11
  2. Negative: 5 out of 11
  1. I'd be suprised if Anthony Horowitz actually liked this adaptation of possibly one of the best teenage books you could read. It is boring, cliche and most of all, it fails to capture the action presented within the book. Full Review »
  2. JuraM
    3
    The novels thrill you with teenage espionage, action and drama. This movie doesn't. To get quickly to the point the movie is so full of "cheese" the excitement is ruined. This movie had a lot of potential to become a teenage classic but the director's completely wrong direction with the movie turns it into a woeful "action-comedy" when it should of definitely been on par with the balance of realism and fun in the newer James Bond movies. Ridiculously stupid costume choices and horrible castings (looks at the "ginger" Jack Starbright, eye-liner on Rouke and the "stormbreaker machine" which is a COMPUTER, not a giant rotating eye.) plus the bland acting of an actor who was way too old for his part as Alex ruined the film. Extremely disappointing! I hope a new director can take a new direction and turn these films into what they should be. Full Review »
  3. rob
    5
    It was nice to see one of my favorite books put into film, however, it seemed a bit rushed and toned down. The book was exciting, the movie was childish. Full Review »