- Studio: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM)
- Release Date: Oct 13, 2006
User Score
4.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 19 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 7 out of 19
-
Mixed: 3 out of 19
-
Negative: 9 out of 19
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SamOct 14, 20063Clichéd, ridiculous, and rancid, Stormbreaker lacks anything that reminds you of the words "Fun" and "full of life"
-
-
AndrewM.Jan 26, 20072This film is a typically by numbers affair in many respects. The worst aspect is the trite dialogue which is riddled with Alex's cringeworthy one liners. What makes this so unconvincing is the actor himself has the hard-man value of a kitten with three legs. If you can get past this, which I couldn't, there's a possibility you might enjoy it.
-
-
robJul 8, 20085It was nice to see one of my favorite books put into film, however, it seemed a bit rushed and toned down. The book was exciting, the movie was childish.
-
-
ThomasS.Feb 9, 20076Seen the movie yesterday on DVD. While it had entertaining moments it didn't feel very cohesive. The movie is clearly aimed at teenagers (which I'm not) and I greatly regret Ewan McGregor's early exit.
-
-
JuraMJul 28, 20093
-
-
Oct 18, 20104I'd be suprised if Anthony Horowitz actually liked this adaptation of possibly one of the best teenage books you could read. It is boring, cliche and most of all, it fails to capture the action presented within the book.
-
[Anonymous]Oct 30, 20078Okay I so loved this movie and do not know y it got bad reviews. i mean how were they watching the movie anyway with alex pettyfer in it. so i liked it a lot. BUT I SUGGEST U READ THE BOOKS FIRST THEY R SO MUCH BETTER! i promise.
-
-
kittyJul 9, 200810This is one of my favorite movies ever. I love all of the actors in it and I really think that they all did a good job. I also think that even though it isn't completely like the book they did a good job of changing things and still keeping most of everything.
-
-
JayHFeb 29, 200865.5/10. young adult James Bond, rather clever at times and has some good action sequences. The bad guys in this are so obvious it doesn't leave much for the imagination. Fun, shallow nonsense. Well edited, good cinematography.
-
-
BrianLApr 29, 20080this is not even related to the book.... what the hell, who kill people hanging upside down from a helicopter anyway? and why not just shoot alex rider in the head?
-
-
Feb 24, 20122Another teenage money-in-the bank movie, cheesy as hell. Alot of money spent into it, no doubt about it, but the story is lacking. Another movie that ruins a great books reputation cover. Do not watch this for the book, but only if you enjoy teenage spy films with oneliners and uniteresting characters.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
38A British flick based on the first novel in a popular teenage spy-thriller series by Anthony Horowitz, looks promising but, unfortunately, doesn't measure up.
-
40A lame and disappointing affair.
-
30A shake 'n' bake Brit teen-spy actioner, without a smidgeon of originality, humor or involving characterization, Stormbreaker is a high-profile bust.