- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: Sep 4, 2009
User Score
3.6
out of 10
Generally unfavorable- based on 90 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 23 out of 90
-
Mixed: 14 out of 90
-
Negative: 53 out of 90
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JackDFeb 1, 20100Gigantic piece of donkey shit. If anyone enjoys this movie even remotely they need to see a psychiatrist or commit seppuku for betraying the human race. I'm extremely disgusted that I wasted an hour and a half watching this "movie."
-
-
AaronA.Sep 20, 20090I went to the theater and bought tickets to this movie. Watched 5 minutes and it was the most pathetic attempt at humor i have ever seen, along with norbit. I got a refund and ended up seeing jennifers body, which was amazing. go see that movie instead.
-
-
JohnstonSep 7, 20090Why would someone as beloved as Sandra Bullock agree to make such a terrible movie? So sad!
-
-
DoOoodJan 3, 20103After a brief tour of being mediocre in The Blind Side, Bullock is back to making unfunny cable television friendly crap. Right there with Miss Congeniality 3 (yet to be released).
-
-
DeloresL.Sep 10, 20091Very disappointing - no plot, Not humorous, skits on tonight show and Saturday night live were better. We walked out half way through.
-
-
WendelynDSep 5, 20091It was easily one of the most inane movies I've ever seen. It was one cliche after another. It was painful to watch! ..and I like Sandra Bullock.
-
-
TomMSep 5, 20090The only reason anyone rated this above a zero is because after they paid 20 bucks they were unwilling to admit they wasted their money
-
-
RalphieBoySep 6, 20090Awful is the only word to describe this crap.
-
-
RienyeN.Jan 11, 20100
-
-
TylerD.Dec 29, 20093This movie was, in a word, embarassing. The plot is pathetic - throughout the whole movie I kept thinking "who would make a movie about this?" Sandra Bullock fit the roll very well - that's all I'll say about the movie.
-
-
KPSep 10, 20092In general, Sandra Bullock and her agent couldn't pick a decent script if their lives depended on it.
-
-
LanceESep 22, 20092Generally awful with an occasional giggle every 15 minutes. The most redeeming factor is that since my wife picked out this crap-fest, I will get at least 6 months of leverage to unilaterally choose the movies we see.
-
-
LauraGSep 4, 200910I thought this movie was hilarious!
-
-
SaraBSep 4, 20099I thought Sandra Bullock pulled this role off well. For what it's worth, its a quirky, goofy movie that offers some laughs and some meaningful moments.
-
-
RichardGSep 4, 20095It was definitely not the best comedy, but it's a lot of very silly humor. At least Sandra Bullock plays the character well. She's not nearly as annoying as most critics say. The audience I saw it with enjoyed themselves. It's worth seeing.
-
-
Bas1311Sep 5, 20091I'm a big fan of Sandra Bullock, but this one was just a mess from the start. The main character was annoying and the object of her affection was bland and under-written. Overall, no real redeeming qualities.
-
-
VinceYSep 5, 200910
-
-
DanRJan 19, 20101This film was showing as the in-flight movie on our way back from Egypt at the weekend. It was so bad that when we hit some turbulence over Venice, almost half the plane were praying for a plane crash, just to end the agony.
-
-
ArtAJan 2, 20100Terrible!!! You have got to be kidding me. They must have all been high when they signed on to be in this movie. One of the worst of all time.
-
-
RafaelS.Jan 3, 20102This is awful. Sandra plays an annoying stalking idiot savant. We cringe at her every move. The end.
-
-
BrianN.Jan 5, 20100This movie was a horrendously unfunny piece of crap. Sandra Bullock plays her character perfectly according to script, which unfortunately was a terrible idea. Sad that she can make a wonderful movie like The Blind Side yet turn.
-
-
AlexSJan 6, 20100This Movie is torturous to watch, i would rather remove eyes then watch this movie again, please for the sake of comedy, DO NOT WATCH THIS FILM!
-
-
DonCOct 21, 20091
-
-
MaxineK.Oct 4, 20095Yes the movie was as bad as they say, but I did not mind seeing it, nor did I regret it. I went to see the film because I wanted to laugh and laugh I did, even if it was at how bad it was... I've seen worse and at no point did I even consider leaving the theatre.
-
-
tyroneASep 10, 20090People actually gave this movie a perfect ten. Then can I give it a negative 100? Hands down it wins the Rasberry as the Worst Movie of The Year. There is no other competition. To enjoy this flick you need to have a lobotomy or check your brains in at the door.
-
-
EmilyC.Sep 11, 20092I love both Sandra Bullock and Thomas Hayden but the movie was so bad I walked out of the theater. It was a waste of my time!
-
-
TDKinDallasSep 12, 20094Really bad, but I did laugh a lot. This is one of those movies that you have to wonder how it ever got green-lighted.
-
-
TeaCookiesSep 22, 20098This movie was fun to watch. Of course like any comedy you can't take it serious so just sit back and enjoy.
-
-
FredBSep 4, 20090This movie sucked. Worst movie of '09 and probably the decade.
-
-
ChadSSep 4, 20092
-
-
DaneMSep 6, 20090Tasteless. I fell asleep.
-
-
jeffhSep 7, 20095Yes this movie was badly written but Sandra Bullocka and Thomas Hayden church make it sort of a guilty pleasure.
-
-
LindaKSep 7, 200910
-
-
JasonD.Jan 12, 20103Wasn't that great. Laughed @some parts but overall not very great. Hayden was funny but Sandra was a little too annoying.
-
-
CathyL.Jan 17, 20107This is a cute movie...no masterpiece but an enjoyable film. Great cast.
-
-
TristanB.Jan 23, 20108I liked the movie first of all because I like the way she stalks the dude or whatever, relatively funny. The SECOND reason is Bullocks is hot.
-
-
davidt.Nov 21, 20094Yes, the character was annoying, but there were some laughs and I only spent $2 to watch it...so why not.
-
-
KKOct 17, 20090Sandra Bullock has destroyed any good will she had developed from decades of light, but still enjoyable comedies with this disturbing, and unenjoyable disaster.
-
-
RickAOct 18, 20093Not to impressed. Maybe with different casting the movie may have been better but because Sandra Bullock did not fit the part it was not that good. It seemed like she was trying to reach this eccentric person but I think she could not do the part justice. The rest of the cast seemed pretty good for the story. Oh well sometimes it works and some times it does not.
-
-
MiKEDec 23, 20090Seems like the people behind the movie had such a good idea, But didnt work to the point where they just stuck a pointless 45 ending with the whole mine incident.
-
-
ManusADec 30, 20093WOW. This movie got a 17?! I didn't think it was TERRIBLE, but it could have been much, much better. Bullock and Cooper are not given time to develop their relationship, the characterizations were mean-spirited, over-the-top, and inconsistent with a side of offensive humor.
-
-
CarterW.Sep 16, 200910
-
-
LaurenSep 18, 20091I am a movie person, don't get me wrong. I love going to the movies and I enjoy everything from Sweeney Todd to things like 17 again. But this? Just plain dumb! It was stupid. Not much to say about it except I did not LIKE this movie at all!
-
-
APNov 29, 20090I love Sandra Bullock, but this movie was just awful. Just embarrassingly awful! What was she thinking?
-
-
JoseRDec 29, 200910This movie is absolutely fantastic, it's incredible that people can´t see how incredible is this film. best of the year.
-
-
Aug 21, 20109i have to say i liked it and i recomend it, she is crazy and i got it i guss she won the award for the worst actress but i think everyone is crasy to say that, liked it and my girlfirend did to
-
Oct 22, 20115It really wasn't that bad. I don't quite understand all of the hate. It wasn't all that funny, but it wasn't a "Gigantic piece of donkey **** or "the most pathetic attempt at humor i have ever seen" or even "sewerific". I could sit through it, and it was kind of fun.
-
Sep 20, 20102Ouch. This film hurts. Instead of giving the main character appraisals, she is mocked into being insane and moronic. So many plot holes, bad casting and a completely and utterly creepy and disturbing tone. Avoid. Now.
-
Jan 5, 20110I've seen a lot of movies in my time and I guess I tend to favour a good comedy, hey, I love the odd bad comedy, but this is neither, this is the movie equivalent of being bled out, I would rather swim in a pool of razor blades than watch this poor attempt at comedy again, truly terrible stuff
-
Aug 26, 20111
-
Jan 11, 20123
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
A dippy clunker like All About Steve has no purpose other than as a challenge: If you laden a usually charming A-lister with a thoroughly off-putting, unhinged character, can she claw her way to likability? The short answer is no. The long answer is, what in the world was Bullock, who also produced the movie, thinking?
-
A head-banging excuse for a comedy.
-
20Much of what's offensive and insufferable about All About Steve can be laid at the feet of screenwriter Kim Barker, best known for inflicting "License to Wed" on the world. Why do these people still earn obscene amounts of money churning out dreck? And why do stars like Bullock keep paying them?