Metascore
64 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 35 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 22 out of 35
  2. Negative: 5 out of 35
  1. A lean and mean horror comedy classic.
  2. Funny, pungent, and weirdly gripping.
  3. 90
    An uneven movie that nonetheless bristles with stinging wit and exerts a perverse fascination.
  4. An ethereal, creepy, almost breathtaking meditation on the life of a mind snapped in two.
  5. 90
    Harron's adaptation of Ellis's novel is brilliant, probably better than the book itself.
  6. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    90
    But the carnage, like the sex scenes, is shot so pristinely that it becomes a nouvelle-cuisine feast; this is a splatter film Martha Stewart could love.
  7. Reviewed by: Don Kaye
    90
    A provocative success; wiping away the gore, Harron and Bale have found a mirror that forces us to look at ourselves and ask tough, disturbing questions -- which is ultimately what the best satire always does.
  8. 80
    Cloaking (Bateman's) world in a hyperrealist light so sharp you could cut yourself on it, Harron keeps the violence minimal, over the top and ghoulishly funny.
  9. 80
    Bateman could have been much more interesting if he'd been played by someone who wouldn't need to work quite so hard (Charlie Sheen or Rob Lowe might have been fascinating here).
  10. 80
    The slick satire cleverly equates materialism, narcissism, misogyny, and classism with homicide, but you may laugh so loud at the protagonist that you won't be able to hear yourself laughing with him.
  11. 75
    Christian Bale is heroic in the way he allows the character to leap joyfully into despicability.
  12. 75
    Has the feverish intensity of a bad dream, leavened with a subversive sense of humor that is both sophisticated and cracked.
  13. The real highlight is when Bateman and his co-workers compare custom business cards in a grueling, ego-shattering game of one-upmanship that is so linked to their sense of self it might as well be Russian roulette.
  14. Reviewed by: Mike Clark
    75
    Exceedingly well cast and assembled with flashy visuals and pacing by Harron, this period piece is diminished by its relative pointlessness.
  15. A withering condemnation of a culture where greed is a virtue, a culture that you don't have to feel guilty for laughing at.
  16. 71
    The film's details are spot-on, its tone ludicrously ironic, and its casting deft.
  17. Reviewed by: David Edelstein
    70
    Nearly perfect for what it is.
  18. Reviewed by: Dennis Harvey
    70
    Pace is sleek, airless and apt.
  19. 67
    Neither bloodthirsty enough to trigger the gag reflex of anyone but the most anemic viewer nor clever enough to yield much in the way of particularly engrossing insights.
  20. 67
    It's so steeped in the coldness and inhumanity of its protagonist that it's ultimately more clinical than absorbing.
  21. A second-rate nightmare: the Reagan generation meets Leatherhead with flickers of brilliance drowned in blood and snobbery, a corpse dressed by Bloomingdale's.
  22. Harron validates and largely clarifies the work.
  23. Reviewed by: Ken Fox
    60
    It's not a great film, but let's face it: Considering the source, this is as good as it was ever going to get.
  24. There's nothing beyond the bloodshed and gallows humor, just intellectually secondhand implications about materialism, conformity and misogyny.
  25. A standard-issue slasher movie, stylishly shot, but with little to distinguish it from a long line of "Psycho"-spawned gorefests.
  26. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    50
    In both senses of the word, American Psycho wastes its women.
  27. A fairly loathsome and shallow movie about loathsome and shallow people, but it's almost worth catching to see star Christian Bale chew up the scenery.
  28. 50
    (Harron) has made a passionless movie about a passionless man, and it's all supposed to add up to make us feel or even just think something, but what?
  29. 50
    Lacking any equivalent to the Sadean excess of Ellis's prose, it is also further evacuated of purpose.
  30. Reviewed by: John Hartl
    50
    (Herron) just doesn't make the case that this book was worth filming.
  31. A misfiring black comedy oddly reminiscent of all those bad 1990s movies about strippers getting killed at bachelor parties.
  32. A high-end version of "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" set in the rarefied bistros, boites and brokerages of Yuppie Manhattan in the 1980s.
  33. Ambiguity can enrich a movie, but artists abdicate their responsibilities if they don't take a stance of any kind.
  34. Stillborn, pointless piece of work.
  35. Most of American Psycho just sits there, looking at trouble, rather than looking for it - complacent, overjoyed in fact to exist at all.
User Score

Universal acclaim- based on 102 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 28 out of 34
  2. Negative: 2 out of 34
  1. 10
    Based on the book of the same name, American Psycho is a journey through the mind of a mentally deranged yuppie. While that makes it seem like a very serious movie it's actually very funny in a dark sense. Christian Bale is delightful as the main character Patrick Bateman. Full Review »
  2. From writer Bret Easton Ellis, author of the dark teen 1980’s novel turned film “Less Than Zero”, comes another privileged, white, male, drug addicted, 1980’s film. But this time with murder! The film American Psycho, set in late-1980’s New York City, follows young Wall Street man Patrick Bateman as he mingles with his fellow privileged co-workers during the day and kills prostitutes and homeless people during the night. The film is pretty loose, that is to say the closest thing to a real story line is how Patrick deals with being mistaken for someone else and how he deals with the police when they start questioning him about a disappearance of a co-worker, whom Patrick killed. This is what most of the film shows. But it’s not really boring, not at all. It’s Bateman, played with such emotionless and such a straight-face by Mr. Bruce Wayne himself Christian Bale that makes the film entertaining. It’s the way that he sort of makes the character so emotionless and way that Patrick knows that he shows no emotions that makes the film and this character so interesting. I think that this film is more of a character study than a slasher film. He is a smart, music enthusiast with a knack for New Wave, just with a little need to kill, and it is a need. But it’s not just the Patrick’s character that’s interesting in the film I think. The people that Patrick surrounds himself with, each as successful and superficial as himself, all sort of look up to Patrick, while Patrick himself despises most of them. Patrick’s friends seem not to realize how mad Patrick is. There are many instances in the film where Patrick lets out fits of rage and the people around him seem to not even notice. Patrick says things such as “I like to dissect girls. Did you know I’m utterly insane?” and there are no responses at all. This is either because of the selfishness of his friends or that it simply may be just in his head. My only real problem is the ending. It’s a rather ambiguous and left in the open ending. It doesn’t give you a clear precise ending, it’s a simple little sentence and then a long look at Patrick with his emotionless face and that’s it. It’s more or less up to the viewer to determine what has happened. Now while I think that this technique may work for some films, I think that since most of the film, with Patrick’s strict and uniformed life and personality, the ending just doesn’t fit the rest of the film. But overall, despite the ending, the film is very enjoyable in a sick little way. You may find yourself saying “Wow.” to some of the things that the characters do and say, but I think that that makes it more interesting. And the murder scenes, Patrick seeming so comfortable and in control, are so meticulously put together, it’s just so fun. This is an entertaining murder romp with a heart of cold ice. 3/5, B Full Review »
  3. A frank and unsettling insight into the mind of a psychopath. Christian Bale gives an excellent performance and really sells the character to the audience. The tension and thrills slowly and effectively build as the movie progresses. The film can be a bit disjointed at times, possibly due to the cutting of some material in the transition from book to movie. Full Review »