- Studio: HBO Films
- Release Date: Aug 15, 2003
User Score
8.0
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 65 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 56 out of 65
-
Mixed: 2 out of 65
-
Negative: 7 out of 65
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
BubicarA.Sep 10, 200310Excellent stuff.
-
-
MikeN.Sep 7, 200410The only thing more amazing about this movie than the acting and plot was the way it was filmed. beautiful mix of reality and filming.
-
-
KarenD.Aug 21, 200310One of the best movies I've ever seen, and a whole new genre!
-
-
JosephC.Aug 20, 200310Doesn't get more ordinarily great than this.
-
-
BryceP.Aug 30, 200310
-
-
AaronM.Sep 18, 200310Bub J., let me guess your favorite movies are 2 fast 2 furious, and bad boys II.
-
-
CelineS.Sep 21, 200310I love this movie. one of the most interstingly done movies around.
-
-
DamngoodpictureOct 4, 200310There's not a movie out there now as funny, real, cranky or touching.
-
-
JaneH.Aug 24, 200310Very funny and very moving!
-
-
MatthewP.Sep 20, 200310Top notch. Giamatti and Davis are a revelation, and Pekar is a true working class hero.
-
-
R.DalviApr 11, 200610Excellent. Liked the comedy as well as the dramedy. There was the nerd thing which I liked as well. Good movie.
-
-
JoeyM.Nov 21, 200310
-
-
ChadS.Sep 13, 200310
-
-
RobertA.Feb 17, 200410This movie is just wonderful. i really enjoyed it. Giamatti is great in this film. i didn't know what to expect when i put it in...but it ended up being one of the most uplifting experiences that i have ever had.
-
-
SlipS.May 16, 200410A really unique film. Very interesting, well done, and funny.
-
-
russellkruzNov 6, 200610fantastic film.
-
-
ButteredP.Dec 3, 200610
-
-
JoshW.Feb 11, 20049It was certainly a great film and Paul Giamatti gave one of the years best performances. Despite how good it is, I personally feel that it got a little too much hype. Lost in Translation is a classic, this was just a great movie.
-
-
KevinC.Feb 11, 20049I had just finished watching a terrible movie (Underworld) when I popped this in the VCR. It totally restored my faith in movies. Completely originally done, and unlike any documentary/drama I've ever seen before. It's both humorous and sad at the same time. Very entertaining and excellently well done.
-
-
BenA.Feb 16, 20049VERY good. Well written, and well acted. I liked this movie; its style and direction was quite unique. It was like semi-documentary and semi-biography. Funny, entertaining, worth seeing it.
-
-
UnbearableLightnessDec 16, 20039Although there were some stylistic flourishes I felt would have been better suited for the cutting room floor, I loved this film. I loved it almost as much as I loved both "Crumb" and "Ghost World". Hope Davis is amazing. A film much better suited for her acting talent than "Next Stop Wonderland".
-
-
ElliottOct 5, 20038By no means a great film, but nevertheless and entertaining one. It got off to a slow start and on many occasions it seemed as though it was begging to be liked. Strong acting all around however, and the approach to the story (from a directing standpoint) was nothing short of brilliant.
-
-
SamL.Oct 26, 20038What an exellent film. Wow, I haven't seen a good film in a long time, so this is a nice treat.
-
-
J.RyanG.Jun 17, 20057Technique gets in the way of substance on more than one occasion, but there is plenty of substance here. As a friend once told me, this film is about dreadfully ordinary people becoming something close to extraordinary, looking quite peculiar all the while. If only there were more SCENES - I mean whole, uncut, untouched, straightforward, unabashedly confident and beautiful SCENES.
-
-
Oct 12, 20107Large credit for the appeal of this film is the visionary direction interweaving comic drawings into the film and the masterful performance of Paul Giamatti. Deservedly received awards from independent film festivals such as Sundance.
-
ClawthroughThehypeJan 18, 20046The movie was quirky and occasionally fun, but it's way over-hyped. It's not bad, but it's not great either.
-
-
ChristopherJ.Mar 20, 20074I was excited about watching it, but then I didn't like it that much. It seemed to me like to much unjustified bitterness, if I remember correctly. I tried to watch it again, but I fell asleep.
-
-
BubJ.Aug 29, 20033Absurdly overrated.
-
-
MarcK.Sep 24, 20033What a huge disappointment. Unlike most critics (and Sundance), I found Pekar to be most unlikeable, and I wasn't thrilled with his quirky wife and "borderline autistic" friend. And were we supposed to believe that his appearances on Letterman were sincere rather than schtick? I don't think so. I couldn't wait for this movie to end.
-
-
SpillyD.Feb 13, 20043Don't understand the hype behind this movie. really dull and ultimately forgettable. the only funny parts were with his slightly retarded coworker. i can laugh more watching howard stern make fun of freaks. didn't like crumb either if that helps.
-
-
AdamG.Nov 12, 20032Just plain dull. If I wanted to experience a dull meaningless life, I could have just lived my own instead of wasting 90 odd minutes watching someone else's!
-
-
Didin'tLaikitSep 9, 20031It just simply was not a good or entertaining movie in any way. While it was done well, it was a poor idea to begin with and a complete waste of money.
-
-
[Anonymous]Feb 24, 20041When this movie isn't depressing it's boring. It strives to be the opposite of a big high budget commericalized production but just because it's different doesn't make it good. It is refreshing to watch a story that is based on characters but not the ones in this movie. Waste Of Time.
-
-
88One genuine small triumph of American Splendor is that the title isn't ironic. The movie is a splendid, inventive piece of urban Americana about that hardboiled original, Harvey Pekar.
-
91Thoroughly unique work of art.
-
100It's a humane and witty treatment of an average life that, incidentally, speaks to the worth and inherent drama of average lives.