Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
Anaconda
User Score
4.6 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 23 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 23
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 23
  3. Negative: 8 out of 23

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. EdM.
    Jan 29, 2005
    8
    I thought this was an excellent film. It was creepy and exciting. I would advise you to see it some time!!!!!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. FredW.
    Aug 8, 2005
    7
    I thought it was a good. A little stupid at times, but good.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. KD
    Dec 13, 2005
    10
    I dont know why critics dogged this movie so bad. i didnt see anything wrong with it. it was fast paced funny and thrilling. everything u could ask for.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. Sam
    Aug 24, 2005
    6
    It's a fun film. Is it super fantastic, kick-ass, best film of all time, classic? No, not really. The best part is watching Jon Voight trying to capture the snake, then running away, then getting swalloed whole by it. Yeah, that was cool. Not many scenes that are as memorable, though, but for those that are looking for a good creature feature after crap like Python and Some gator and croc flicks, see this. Better than the sequel, which, these days, after excellent films like Batman, but its even more kick-ass sequel, begins, and Spider-Man 2, you can't really say alot.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. PatrickB.
    Jun 11, 2006
    0
    Horrible plot, bad editing, cheesy effects, and even bad acting by A-list stars. One of the worst movies I've seen in a long time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. rdavies
    Nov 14, 2010
    4
    The special effects were terrible, well for 90% of the film. I started off OK and until half way through it was a decent watch, but the film caved in on its own complications. They went too far and over the top towards the end to the point where you were almost certain the snake/jon voight was going to somehow survive the attacks that would certainly have killed them had the film been sem-realistic. Jon Voight was regurgitated and a snake survived being blown up. I'll give this a 4 down to some good performances from Lopez and Voight and a good start. - Had it not been for the deterioration near the end this would get a 7.… Expand
  7. j30
    Feb 13, 2012
    4
    Anaconda is one of those movies you watch again late at night and think what's the big deal? It's not awful or merely good, it's just a bad 90's action movie.
  8. JoseRochaPT
    Oct 3, 2011
    0
    A completely idiotic movie where the only thing I can understand that there is a giant snake that eats all the characters of the film. Are many unanswered questions.
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
37 out of 100

Generally unfavorable - based on 20 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 20
  2. Mixed: 6 out of 20
  3. Negative: 9 out of 20
  1. Washington Post
    Reviewed by: Rita Kempley
    30
    Mr. Whipple squeezing his Charmin is scarier than this phony baloney computer effects-driven anaconda.
    Read full review
  2. San Francisco Chronicle
    Reviewed by: Mick LaSalle
    25
    So desperate and silly that here and there, it's a lot of fun.
    Read full review
  3. San Francisco Examiner
    Reviewed by: G. Allen Johnson
    0
    If only director Luis Llosa and his cast could see the joke and seize upon it; instead, like its computer-morphed snake, the film doesn't have a clever bone in its body.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »