- Studio: New Line Cinema
- Release Date: Sep 19, 2008
User Score
5.5
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 70 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 38 out of 70
-
Mixed: 10 out of 70
-
Negative: 22 out of 70
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
pdxsrwMar 26, 20091
-
-
scarpyO.Oct 6, 200810Believable and likable characters with a great blend of humor, violence and a great unpredictable ending. Can't remember a western this enjoyable.
-
-
ShaneB.Oct 6, 20085
-
-
idiotartJan 10, 20090I couldn't agree more with D.R. The critics must be smoking something. I've lost all respect for Harris.
-
-
JohnC.Feb 12, 20098Its a good old fashion western. I loved it.
-
-
RyanS.Mar 1, 20090This movie was short on the classic westerns gun slinging and full of power struggles between the characters of the movie. Ed Harris is a great actor, but this movie defiantly rates a movie that leaves much to be desired. I would not recommend this movie to anyone who is looking for a movie that has the same results as tombstone.
-
-
KDGAug 31, 20092Yawn and double yawn. Zellweger is either horribly miscast or phonig it in, and I generally like her. Although it is beautifully shot and Mortensen is typically strong, the story goes nowhere and it does so very slowly with, at ltimes, shockingly bad dialogue. Don't bother wasting your time on this one.
-
-
GaryM.Oct 13, 20083Dreadefully boring. A collection of oater cliches occupied about a third of the film, the other two thirds being spent in . . . meaningful transitions? Studies of how little there really was to do in the Old West? Whatever.
-
-
TerryROct 18, 20085Ok, not great...no masterpiece that is for sure. Script is highly leveraged from Open Range. Acting is not great. Can actors please quit getting facelifts and brightsmile treatments? Rene Z looked freakish in this movie with her too tight to smile face, and nothing like seeing a rugged old cowboy show up and bust out a Jessica Simpson type smile. See also: Powers Booth in Deadwood.
-
-
AnnB.Oct 4, 20088The story line wasn't exactly "new," but the film was beautifully shot and the acting was good. We liked seeing an "old fashioned" Western. But, hey, couldn't they have found an American to play Bragg instead of Jeremy Irons, who was good, but his accent left something to be desired.
-
-
RebeccaA.Sep 18, 20081
-
-
BartJ.Sep 21, 20088A good old-fashioned western.
-
-
BitBurnJan 4, 20097Not that bad. Storyline holds up well, well acted. Lacks a bit action scenes though.
-
-
JasonDeatherageFeb 9, 20096I would have to say that this movie was ok. I liked the characters and the directing, but the story was a little boring. It is basically a love story that was set in the western frontier. If you are looking for a gunblazing western along the lines of Young Guns or Tombstone then this movie is not for you. If you love westerns in general then this movie will be up your alley.
-
-
NickJ.Oct 11, 20082
-
-
BobH.Oct 11, 20083This movie was VERY slow. Things happen without explanation. Good acting, better directing is desired.
-
-
JoshuaM.Oct 10, 20080A western about westerns. This movie was awful.
-
-
D.R.Oct 17, 20080This movie is horrible. The dialogue descends from laughable to appalling. The cinematography is that of an amateurish B-movie. There is no plot, and all attempts at one fail as logic or entertainment. Renee Zellweger is painful to look at and obnoxious. This movie is so bad - so, so bad. I cannot fathom what the critics are thinking or watching.
-
-
JudyTOct 3, 20087Appaloosa is an okay western and an okay movie. It's a great character study in Virigil and Everett. Ed Harris and Viggo Mortensen are great to watch. In the end though Viggo's part is written much better. His rendition of Everett Hitch makes it worth the money.
-
-
DaveA.Oct 6, 20081Boring is the word. There's almost nothing to this movie.
-
-
hughiecSep 17, 20089Exciting and quietly funny. Mortensen and Harris are great. Zellwegger pretty good too.
-
-
JaredC.Sep 18, 200882008's No Country for Old Men, but what it should've got in the reviews. Personally No Country's over rated. But damn, is Appaloosa is what Unforgiven fans and western lovers like.
-
-
SimonH.Sep 29, 20088A welcome return to the western - Fantastic cast, great character relationships, some of the tensest scenes I can ever remember watching - highly recommended.
-
-
JayH.Jan 13, 20097Solid western, well directed and the actors are ideally cast. Fine attention to period detail, great cinematography, fine score, good art direction. A traditional western made with modern flair.
-
-
PatrickR.Jan 16, 20092Tedious, slow, over-stylised. Improbable ending. Zellwegger looks weird with a trout pout. Only Mortensen is worth watching
-
-
JaquieMJan 7, 20092
-
-
JudyG.Feb 14, 20090Without a doubt, one of the worst films I have ever seen-I like Ed harris a lot and I love Westerns but this was terrible- Stilted dialogue, poorly written and very predictable story line-sggest Ed Harris stick with his day job
-
-
DavidRApr 16, 20093Slow, very little to get excited about after the opening scenes and nearly put me to sleep in at least three places. Everybody but Viggo Mortensen appeared to be overacting. Renee Zellweger's character was so badly written she had to be explained by the other characters. I wouldnt recommend this to anyone.
-
-
KyleS.Nov 16, 20081
-
-
MMOct 12, 20084Ed Harris' ego trip. Film rips off HIgh Plains Drifter plus sidekick. Renee Zellwegger is expressionless but we root for Jeremy Irons as the bad guy. The script was crying for dialogue. Take the yellow lens off the camera. Lots of missed opprtunities.
-
-
BEEsniderJul 18, 200910Great Cinematography, acting was superb, I have a feeling most people did not understand much of the story but hey, it's their loss.
-
-
jkDec 21, 20085Hmmm, it was ok, but seemed to go at a purposely slow pace that seemed contrived.. Sometimes I think Zelwegger (Sp?) is hot, but not here.
-
-
Jan 6, 20137
-
Nov 19, 20115It was a decent film but a little too long for my taste and it didnt help that the movie took a bit to get into and was a bit boring as well. But the acting is good in it. Its ok but i dont know if I would suggest it to anyone.
-
Dec 15, 20113Great acting, You cant denie that. The one huge problem of this film is that it lacks interest and its far too long, It made you feel like you were suffering just to get to any decent part in the film. The script could have been a lot better as well.
-
80A fine dramatic comedy with fresh characters, witty dialogue and a keen interest in how relationships must have developed among frontier folks, tyrannical ranchers, no-nonsense lawmen and -- oh, yes -- the complicated women on that frontier.
-
50Harris' first directorial outing since his impressive and entirely different "Pollock" biopic bears echoes of many genre predecessors, especially Howard Hawks' "Rio Bravo" -- but echoes they remain.
-
Harris and his collaborators are playing it straight with a timeless male fantasy--horse, hat, six-shooter--a traditional approach that will please moviegoers like my dad and yours.