Metascore
58 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 33 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 33
  2. Negative: 3 out of 33
  1. 91
    Ask the Dust is more than an amorous period piece. It's a strongly bitter, strongly sweet poem in prose and motion.
  2. More than anything else, Ask the Dust feels like a compendium of desires - for a city, for a woman, for youth.
  3. 75
    Ask the Dust requires an audience with a special love for film noir, with a feeling for the loneliness and misery of the writer.
  4. Reviewed by: Michael Phillips
    75
    Eccentric, miscast (though stimulatingly so), not for all tastes but far from flavorless.
  5. Its portrait of an artist hungry for experience is as timely today as when it was written.
  6. Reviewed by: Ken Fox
    75
    Occasionally overrated as a writer but consistently underrated as a director, Towne does a marvelous job resurrecting all the seedy jumble of the long-gone Bunker Hill neighborhood.
  7. 75
    At a time when juvenile movies often dominate theaters, this is an adult movie through-and-through, and evidence that there are filmmakers who care about entertaining a more mature audience.
  8. Ask the Dust does manage to cast a spell. The film is not only an evocation of a bygone era but an emanation of it as well.
  9. 75
    Ask The Dust may find Towne a little past his prime, but after so much time in the Hollywood wilderness, it's good to see him trying again.
  10. The film is faithful to the book's tone of dark ache and much of its detail and for the most part terrifically cast. But Towne can't overcome an essential challenge of the material: Arturo and Camilla are constructs and ciphers as much as they are vivid characters -- difficult roles, to be sure. Neither the screenplay nor the actors manage to get far under their skin.
  11. 70
    What seduces most about Ask the Dust isn't its verisimilitude, but its gloriously old-fashioned backlot sheen - the L.A. of old Hollywood movies and of our collective fantasies.
  12. 70
    Thirty years of gestation have produced a film of great beauty with unfulfilled promise - a disappointment, but with much to recommend and be glad about.
  13. To Towne's credit, he's a thoughtful and conscientious romantic. He skillfully makes the two main characters a hot, volatile couple, deftly staging their courtship as if it were an erotic grudge match.
  14. 63
    The film, which is literary to a fault, includes an earthquake, but if the earth moves at all, thank Hayek, who gives the tale a smoldering life that finally lifts it from the page.
  15. The sepia-tinted palette of Ask the Dust drips, reeks and creaks of the seamy side of a city that takes more often than it gives.
  16. 63
    After an hour or so, Ask the Dust seems to have said everything, and the air starts to seep out of its hermetic atmosphere.
  17. Reviewed by: Kim Newman
    60
    A curiously resistable drama, despite several strong elements - the most notable being newcomer Idina Menzel.
  18. Reviewed by: David Edelstein
    60
    Something is missing, though. The themes are all there, but the movie doesn't cross the blood-brain barrier and rev you up.
  19. Farrell's performance possesses a touch too many mannerisms on loan from Tyrone Power and Clark Gable; you can almost hear the gears turning in his brain each time he cocks his head or raises an eyebrow in homage.
  20. Reviewed by: Todd McCarthy
    60
    Highlighted by a strong and sensual performance from Salma Hayek as the doomed heroine, elegant pic's muted quality and the central character's vexingly contrary behavior will keep auds from connecting with characters who themselves have trouble establishing bonds.
  21. 58
    Miscast, constricted, loose in tone and meandering in intent, it has far fewer moments of inspiration than unintended laughter.
  22. 50
    It would seem Towne is too much in love with the book to recognize its fundamental limitations as a film.
  23. Reviewed by: Kyle Smith
    50
    Watching it is like being in a restaurant where the waiter brings out a luscious platter of food, then keeps walking right past you. All night long.
  24. Reviewed by: Claudia Puig
    50
    Though the film offers a meticulously rendered Depression-era L.A., it's not in the same league as "Chinatown," for which Towne wrote an Oscar-winning script. Here, the characters seem shallow, their motivations murky.
  25. Reviewed by: John Migliore
    50
    Farrell and Hayek are two beautiful people with absolutely no chemistry. Even when they're lying in bed together, they're so far apart that they might as well be in different movies.
  26. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    50
    Ask the Dust is the ghost of a cult novel; it can't bring itself to life.
  27. Ask the Dust is beautifully shot -- sepia becomes the ravishing, affecting Ms. Hayek. Unfortunately the images of the heaving waves of the Pacific in the moonlight, of mountains rising over scrub and cactus in the sunlight here, serve only to emphasize the emptiness of the drama unfolding in the foreground.
  28. Farrell is badly miscast as an ethnic Italian with an inferiority complex, the star-crossed love story has very little emotional pull, and even the (heavily CGI-enhanced) period atmosphere ultimately seems rather forced and self-conscious.
  29. 40
    Alternately grandiose and abject, Bandini is a sort of underground man, and if no more miscast than usual, heartthrob Colin Farrell miserably fails to convincingly render Bandini's neurosis.
  30. 40
    One of the most eagerly awaited cinematic projects of 2006, which may be why it lands with such a curious thud.
  31. This story, like many of Towne's own, does not come with a happy ending. Or beginning, for that matter, because it's almost immediately clear that Ask the Dust bites the dust -- his dream movie is stillborn.
  32. The film is a particular disappointment considering its pedigree.
  33. The movie lacks even the misplaced fervor of obsession. It's lifeless kitsch.
User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 14 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 11
  2. Negative: 4 out of 11
  1. MiguelV.
    8
    It was the film that led me to reading the book
  2. FredD.
    4
    Hard to watch. stilted and lifeless. too much dialog simply states and restates the obvious. looked good though. the actors are at the mercy of this anachronistic stuff. Ugh. Full Review »
  3. FrankD
    1
    I've seen a hefty percantage of films released in 2006, and this was one was hands-down, the worst. I saw other ones that were terrible, but at least some of them had a few redeeming qualities, if nothing else, unintentionally funny. This one plays likes one long prison sentence. The main reason I bother to post a comment at all is to say that I've seen four movies starring hot boy-du-jour Colin Farrell (Alexander, Phone Booth, A Home at the End of the World, plus this dreck). Except for his intense good looks, what do film directors see in this guy??? I think he is truly a poor actor. All hyoe, no delivery.("Troy Donahue of the new millenium"). Hopefully, he'll disappear soon, and we can return to watching real actors like Philip Seymour Hoffman, Edward Norton, and others who are far more worthy of their salaries and our ticket money and attnetion. Full Review »