- Studio: Rocky Mountain Pictures
- Release Date: Oct 12, 2012
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
67The relevant question now isn't who John Galt is, but how much demand there will be for what the producers supply.
-
50For some, Atlas Shrugged Part II is a ridiculous movie. For others, it's scripture.
-
40The producers are going to have to hire a better director if they want moviegoers to be curious enough about this Galt guy to buy a ticket for the presumptive third and final chapter.
-
40Has a whole new director, cast and crew, with slightly higher production polish and more familiar faces onscreen. Nonetheless, it's consistent with its predecessor as a somewhat awkward translation of Ayn Rand's 1957 novel to our current era, handled with bland telepic-style competency.
-
40This middle portion of an intended trilogy will only play to the converted who have already seen Part I, and then only to the most gullible among them who will swallow mediocre filmmaking for the sake of ideology.
-
Oct 12, 201238Everything about it screams mid-20th century. Rather than refresh the cast with new actors, the producers would have done better to just digitally reanimate Patricia Neal and Gary Cooper, the stars of the 1949 adaptation of Rand's "The Fountainhead."
-
Oct 18, 201230Budgetary constraints aside, director John Putch struggles to find balance or generate a single spark from the clunky mix of romance, political diatribe and thriller.
-
Oct 16, 201230Seriously, if this is the best promotion of itself that the free market can manage, it really would benefit from the help of a Ministry of Culture or something.
-
25Even if you overlooked the production values from a 1986 porno and special effects like something your nephew cooked up on his Mac, the movie's "Yay, money!" zingers are just a big bag of sad.
-
20Atlas won't be the only one to shrug off this tiresome load.
-
0The specific problem with Part II is that a second act of huffery and puffery don't get it anywhere.