- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 10, 2003
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100Big Fish really is a big delight.
-
90A tale that's so enriching, so heartwarming, so funny, so touching and so breathtaking, you'll wonder why the king of wackiness didn't branch out sooner.
-
88Director Tim Burton finally hooks the one that got away: a script that challenges and deepens his visionary talent.
-
88A word of warning. Big Fish is so strange and so literary that audiences seeking conventional fare may get impatient with it. But it always takes effort to catch the big ones. This one is worth it.
-
88Even with Burton's imagination turning its trademark cartwheels, the film's big beating heart holds the whimsical offshoots steady.
-
88Has enough tasty bait to satisfy an array of moviegoers: Burton fans, Albert Finney fans, fans of tall tales well spun by experts and fans of movies that don't look like any other.
-
88This picture boasts a story about a yarn-spinning Southern father (Albert Finney) and a sober-sided son (Billy Crudup) that gives it ballast and staying power beyond anything in previous, precious Burton fables like "Edward Scissorhands" or "Ed Wood."
-
80An achievement of this magnitude is a stunning and extremely pleasant surprise.
-
80In anchoring the whimsy to something more heartfelt, Burton is greatly aided by Billy Crudup, who underplays potentially cringeworthy bedside scenes with his dying dad.
-
80Burton rebounds in a big way with Big Fish, a Daniel Wallace adaptation and visual feast that recaptures the fairy-tale simplicity and wrenching emotional power of "Edward Scissorhands."
-
80When it catches fire, this great-looking movie offers hilarious diversions.
-
75Burton's film is an American version of the Odyssey.
-
75Big Fish is a clever, smart fantasy that targets the child inside every adult, without insulting the intelligence of either.
-
75Like virtually all fish stories, it's discursive, funny, full of boasting, a suspect mix of truth and lies with an emphasis on the latter.
-
75The movie is a gently overstuffed cinematic piñata, crammed with tall tales -- with giants and circuses and fairy-tale woods, plus a huge squirmy catfish, all served up with a literal matter-of-fact fancy that is very pleasing.
-
75Too well-made and well-acted to be entirely cute -- but the result is fairly tepid in comparison to the overheated highlights of Burton's career.
-
70Such astringent details as a banjo player plucking a few ominous notes from "Dueling Banjos" when Ed first lays eyes on the Norman Rockwellian beauty of Spectre ensure that the story's fundamental sweetness never becomes cloying.
-
70There's delight to be had from watching Burton conjure up one fantastical Edward-inspired scenario after another.
-
67An engagingly whimsical, sporadically charming, frequently very funny Southern Gothic fantasy that somehow doesn't quite come together to be as magical or meaningful as it's intended to be.
-
63Big Fish of course is a great-looking film, with a fantastical visual style that could be called Felliniesque if Burton had not by now earned the right to the adjective Burtonesque.
-
63This is a theme tailor-made for Burton, although there are times in the movie when it feels like he's not taking enough advantage of it.
-
63But Burton and August have added anger to the mix, and it sours much of the otherwise wondrous tone.
-
63The actor's job here is the hardest to pull off, since practical skepticism in a Tim Burton picture is next to villainy. Yet Crudup suggests complex grown-up feelings that makes the rest of Big Fish feel like an earnest collection of magic tricks.
-
63The problem is, there's just not enough Burton in Big Fish.
-
60For the first time, Burton seems comfortable walking around the real world.
-
60Simultaneously beguiling and frustrating -- the product of an imagist and dramatist uncomfortably conjoined.
-
60What is most disappointing about Big Fish is the nervousness of its fantasizing--a strange unwillingness, new in Burton's work, to trust the wit of the audience. [15 December 2003, p. 119]
-
50What a waste of a fine cast.
-
50It's nicely made, well shot, and reasonably well acted, yet it's enough to filet the life force right out of you. We need stories in order to dream, and to live. But that doesn't mean we have to buy every crappy one that comes down the pike.
-
50Has moments of genuine emotion...but overall, the film feels like it issues from a place Burton doesn't inhabit.
-
50The most curious thing about this magical-realist fable...is how thin and soft it is, how unpersuasive and ultimately forgettable even its most strenuous inventions turn out to be.
-
50The imaginatively illustrated but precariously precious film offers up a string of minor pleasures but never becomes more than moderately amusing or involving.
-
50The Alabama setting is as phony as the one in Forrest Gump, and for all of Finney's effectiveness as a yarn-spinning geezer, his whoppers seem disconnected from his character and each other--a weakness Burton fails to resolve with an awkward Felliniesque finale.
-
40A misfire. The film that wants to be lighter than air instead crashes to earth with the swiftness of a concrete parachute.
-
40Tim Burton is all grown up and getting serious with this wildly scattershot tale.
-
40The whole seems disjointed, incoherent and lacking in the startling originality of the other two Edwards (Scissorhands and Wood) who, half a career back, poured from Burton's distended outsider imagination.
-
40An abundance of dull exposition building up to the son's attempt to cap his father's whoppers climaxes with a tedious flurry of Fellini-esque endings and Spielbergian fillips. The magic doesn't work twice -- or even once.
-
40The most fluid, lyrical, and even-toned work of his (Burton's) career. It's also the most boring by a factor of 10.
-
40The film fairly groans from all the narrative gamesmanship and lavish romantic gestures...The unbewitched viewer may groan as well.
-
30Big Fish stinks from the head.
-
30A disappointingly dull thud of a fantasy.
-
25A long-winded indulgence in tear-and-a-smile whimsy, elevated above the merely irritating and saccharine by compelling art direction.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 95 out of 109
-
Mixed: 4 out of 109
-
Negative: 10 out of 109
-
AlonsoC.10
-
erixs10Very touching...!! My girlfriend cried after seeing this movie, TWICE !!!
-
samf9This is one of those movies where I can say that if you don't like it, it's because you don't get it.