- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Jul 11, 1992
User Score
8.5
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 157 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 140 out of 157
-
Mixed: 7 out of 157
-
Negative: 10 out of 157
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Aug 12, 201110
-
Dec 26, 20117You see, I'm not a cult follower of Ridley Scott's "Blade Runner", so I have no **** clue of what you zealots see out there. However, what I see is a movie filled with rich, wonderful visuals accompanied by a very, very weak story (but the ending was good).
-
Nov 5, 201010
-
UnknownJFeb 2, 20084
-
-
MatthewH.Nov 7, 20090Worst Sci Fi movie I have ever watched. I don't understand the hype behind this movie. It's slow. Uninspired. And tries to be something that it's not. As in good.
-
-
SantaFeb 3, 201010What interested me most, whether this Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt feel embarrassed after his review of (master-piece) Blade Runner ?!
-
-
steveb.Jun 27, 200510Go with the directors cut. it blows the original cut away.
-
-
J.DoddJan 9, 200410"If only you could see what I've seen with your eyes". The best scifi of all time.
-
-
DrewKMay 1, 201010Best movie ever. Matthew H is either borderline retarded or too stupid to know any different.
-
-
DanB.Nov 13, 20079It's been a while since I saw the original. I was anxious about any new version, but was totally gripped by this one. I never minded the narration in the original (never thought it was bad), but I did not miss it, here. This was my first time seeing it on a big screen and it is still visually inspired, and has aged well.
-
-
TiriodB.Nov 22, 200710This is a classic of the Sci-Fi films, a must seen, the best of its kind without doubt.
-
-
ColR.Dec 14, 200710
-
-
MarkD.Jan 29, 200810My favourite movie, bar none (well, maybe the new cut?).
-
-
SusanL.Mar 1, 200810God is in the details. Every time I see this movie, there is a small visual detail which highlights the blurred line between natural and manufactured humans. Although I like the original better than the Director's Cut, it is still Blade Runner.
-
-
DanyT.Mar 16, 200810I gave 10 because of the original movie that I've seen over 25 times, the director's cut is removing all the mood of the original and slowed down the pace. With the voice over it was so mutch better.
-
-
MarkW.Aug 26, 200810
-
-
AlexR.nNov 3, 200910
-
-
JefferyB.Jul 31, 20050
-
-
RomanRAug 13, 200510One of the best Sci-fi out there.
-
-
BubbaJackOct 12, 20050Thumbs down to the Director's Cut. Adding the dream sequence is just as bad as Lucas adding Greedo's arm or Luke's scream. And deleting the voicerover, it diminshes this film to the point I cannot recommend it to anyone...ever.
-
-
[Anonymous]Nov 18, 20057Director's cut is improvement. Instead of dragging on, it allows the movie to envelop you by itself, and focuses more on the main points. I see why critics may call it a classic, but it's too slow and strange for my taste. I prefer the films it influenced (Ghost in the Shell, etc) to the actual masterpiece.
-
-
JBAug 11, 20069A cleverly dark film that exposes one to visual and cerebral delights.
-
-
JohnSmithSep 26, 20060The whole idea of cyborgs is just ridiculous. There is to much detail in the storyline, making it difficult to follow. How this movie is rated a top sci fi film I still cannot understand. Someone needs to be shot after that one.
-
-
TomDoeOct 12, 200610Not a spelled out movie, with many philosophical and classical literary references and ideas, this film usually leaves viewers polarized. It take more than one viewing to really understand everything and requires the viewer to actually think! Not to say movies can't be wonderful low-brow escapism, but this is not one of those movies.
-
-
ChrisBDec 13, 200610
-
-
HelenM.Jan 1, 200710I saw this movie when it first came out. Few people were in the theatre. I was mesmerized and stunned by what I was seeing. I am seeing it for the 8th time tonight and I am still stunned by the beauty, the existentialism, the acting. It is truly haunting and as relevant today as it was years ago.
-
-
BryanH.Feb 4, 200710Literary, ambient and memorable in the best way. When a film places humanity over human, it supersedes all other competing messages. The atmosphere and passion of this film makes it possibly the best film ever made; certainly the best sci-fi.
-
-
JamesR.Mar 21, 20076The director's cut drastically changes the mood of the film and, in my opinion, not for the better. Most of the Film Noir style of the original has been torn away, resulting in a vague mess that moves at the pace of snail.
-
-
StephenC.Mar 28, 200710
-
-
AliciaSep 3, 20071Dull. Stale. Uninvolving mess...hopefully this film will be overshadowed, its nothing but a torn, unemotional film with no potential whatsoever.
-
-
RD.Sep 28, 200710Awesome movie. Great visuals. Brilliant performances and direction by Scott. Rutger Hauer is awesome and so is Harrison Ford and Sean Young who looks very pretty. I don't know why did it flop. It is such a class act.
-
-
DaveC.Oct 28, 20049
-
-
FlorianB.Jul 12, 200410This is definitely one of the best Movies of Alltime. Not only under the aspect of SciFi! The only movie I can watch over and over again.
-
-
AdamE.Nov 16, 200210Without a doubt the best sci-fi film ever made. Ridley Scott's film keeps the Philip K. Dick atmosphere alive. Everything about this movie is excellent.The actors, the music, the story and the special effects are brilliant!
-
-
SimonD.Jun 26, 20036I have never managed to sit through this on one showing. It has great FX, a good deal of vision, and Harrison Ford, but it doesn't hold together. It also falls short comapred to the much richer novel, and Scott's "revelation" years later that Deckard was a replicant harms the film in some strange way.
-
-
YoonC.Sep 14, 200310
-
-
RyanA.Sep 19, 200310If you fail the Turing Test you can kiss your a-- goodbye.
-
-
WakeUp,TimeToMulroneycakesJul 22, 200310
-
-
AlG.Aug 27, 200210A masterpiece! Ridley Scott's best movie to date (2002).
-
-
NormandJ.Sep 23, 200310One of the best !
-
-
DragoM.Jan 17, 200410Absolutely fantastic and truly humane!
-
-
JohnC.Mar 19, 200410This is one of the greatest movies of all time rendered highly silly by the director's cut. For the love of all that's sacred to pop culture, bring the theatrical release to DVD.
-
-
MikeN.Mar 26, 20046Very stylish, but not very interesting. The acting is so understated that nothing lingers at all. Olmos, who hardly says a word, manages to be more interesting than everybody else in the film.
-
-
DanC.May 3, 200410One of the greatest sci/fi films of all time!
-
-
PatC.Jan 7, 200510
-
-
AkhilK.Jan 28, 200510Absolutely beautiful. What vision! Truly made my heart ache(and pump!). The direction was incredibly and Harrison Ford at his best!
-
-
MikeFeb 14, 200510This is one of the best sci fi movies! The atmosphere of this movie is unforgetable, more then 20 years have gone by and hollywood sitll hasnt made anything close to this movie.
-
-
Aug 17, 20109
-
Aug 23, 20109
-
Dec 3, 20103
-
Jan 8, 20115I think this is the only Harrison Ford movie which i don't like. I mean.... seriously what is special in this movie?
-
Jul 24, 20110
-
Aug 25, 20119
-
Sep 19, 20115I heard great things about this movie and decided to DVR it. The movie's special effects are great but the movie all in all just didn't do it for me. The story was confusing to me and they kept switching from scene to scene. This movie's is just kind of based on opinion
-
Sep 28, 20114This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Oct 15, 20119One of my favorite movies of all time. There are some moments of corny acting, and a few things happen in the movie that I still don't understand, but overall if you're a fan of sci-fi or noire you will love Blade Runner.
-
Jan 24, 201210The Greatest Movie of all Time along with Raiders of the Lost Ark & the original Star Wars.Harrison Ford played in all 3 of the Greatest Movies of all Time-he is the luckiest son of a Gun in the entire Galaxy=) Forget about Godfather, Citizen Kane & all that crap for Old Farts.Blade Runner, Raiders & A New Hope are the Greatest of all TIme.Harrison Ford is GOD without his will.
-
Jan 30, 201210This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Feb 19, 20128Blade Runner is a difficult movie to review as its a landmark science fiction masterpiece that has gone on to influence much of science fiction in movies and video games but on the other hand I find it boring as hell. Studying this movie for culture purposes is fascinating, watching for entertainment value is another thing.
-
Mar 21, 20129
-
Apr 4, 201210The very definition of cyberpunk. The best soundtrack to a movie ever, by the one and only Vangelis. Revolutionary from a technical standpoint. A great story. A true cult classic.
-
May 18, 20128Gritty, dark, beautiful, scary, alien. Five words that I can use to sum up what Blade Runner represents to me. A brilliant film that ever science fiction fan should make a point of seeing.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
100Grand enough in scale to carry its many Biblical and mythological references, Blade Runner never feels heavy or pretentious -- only more and more engrossing with each viewing. It helps, too, that it works as pure entertainment.
-
100The grafting of 40s hard-boiled detective story with SF thriller creates some dysfunctional overlaps, and the movie loses some force whenever violence takes over, yet this remains a truly extraordinary, densely imagined version of both the future and the present, with a look and taste all its own.
-
38As before, the movie is more impressive for its finely detailed vision of Los Angeles as a futuristic slum than for its story, acting, or message. It's all downhill after the first few eye-dazzling minutes. [2 Oct 1992]