- Studio: Paladin (II)
- Release Date: Feb 19, 2010
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75The movie tells this story in a traditional, straightforward way. No fancy footwork. No chewing the scenery. Meat and potatoes, you could say, but it's thoughtful and moving.
-
75May not be great cinema, but it nonetheless deserves attention.
-
75“Blood” may carry us into the past, but the unhappy effects linger today, like pollution darkening a sky that never turned completely blue.
-
Draws attention to a little-known chapter in the history of the civil-rights movement, but it doesn’t do much to pull that moment into the present, or to pull the audience into the past.
-
63The actors do a lot to dimensionalize the material. Parker's Chavis is especially sharp, creating a man with a subtly burning fuse.
-
60Though it can't quite transcend its filmmaker's earnest intentions, this solemn history lesson offers several powerful moments.
-
50Suffers from an awkward, plodding structure that robs it of much of its dramatic effect.
-
50Despite its earnestness and valuable lessons, however, "Blood" feels a little like preaching to the choir.
-
50A curious, somewhat ungainly movie. But it is also rich and fascinating. At times you think you are watching a clumsy stage pageant superimposed on a documentary; it’s so stiff, and yet at the same time so real.
-
50Jeb Stuart directed, his well-rounded portrait of the community partly undermined by the slack editing; with Rick Schroder as the minister and Michael Rooker as the defense attorney.
-
40You can’t deny the inspirational qualities of the story or Parker’s screen presence, any more than you could accuse the film of subtlety or of masking its conspicuous pro-Christian agenda.
-
Ultimately, however, the movie is about the fact that there was a civil rights movement at all, and incidents like the murder of Dickie Marrow necessitated that movement--deep into the 1970s and beyond.
-
40An earnest, if inert, civil rights docudrama clearly shot on the cheap (many of the wigs appear to have been borrowed from the Black Dynamite set).
-
The material gets away from him (Stuart) quickly, leaving emotionally forced, clunky filmmaking that feels simultaneously rushed and dawdling, like a chopped-down TV miniseries. (It even has natural commercial breaks.)
-
40Comes off as a painfully old-fashioned, flatly directed exercise in passionless historical reenactment.
-
25Rolls out stiff clichés to tell a familiar story of racial injustice in the South.