- Studio: New Line Cinema
- Release Date: Apr 6, 2001
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
100Scorches the screen with a badass bravado all its own. Smart, sexy, funny and dangerous this high-wire act is a movie and a half.
-
88Rarely since the tale of the Corleones has a movie presented such a compelling, sympathetic portrait of a criminal lowlife.
-
83Melancholy, haunting and riveting true-crime saga.
-
75Consistently compelling without being truly memorable.
-
75Carries little in the way of passion or revelatory charge.
-
70Seductive, funny, whip-smart and ultimately tragic.
-
70Funny, immediately and consistently engaging, and -- well done on almost every level.
-
70It's basically your above-average nice drug movie.
-
63Take away the drugs, and this is the story of a boring life in wholesale.
-
63It's a real disappointment: too hasty, too scattered and superficial, and, in the end, disappointingly sappy and sentimental.
-
63Ends up a portrait through a rose-colored lens, turning a social parasite into a Greek hero.
-
63Too soft on its lead character and too willing to chalk up America's drug appetites to the times-that-were-a-changin' in the '60s.
-
60Hopefully ambitious yet hopelessly lightweight.
-
60Respectable but unmemorable end result may suffer from comparison with the similarly themed, albeit differently angled, “Traffic.”
-
50Inherently stale.
-
50A facile treatment of a complicated subject.
-
50The real problem is that there's nothing to George but the movie's props.
-
50It's an honest portrayal, but it leaves the audience stranded, without the emotional hook of a character we can care about.
-
50Blew its chance to be an epic drug opera. It's only nostril-deep.
-
50The acting is solid.
-
50A watchable mediocrity at best.
-
50Depp aside, the movie is higher on style than it is on substance.
-
50It downplays the effects of George's drug trafficking, not so much on himself and his cronies as on the wrecked lives of the generation of customers we never get to see.
-
50If as much thought had been expended on character and consequences as was lavished on bell-bottom diameters, collar widths and soundtrack selection, Blow might have been a richer, more intelligent experience, and much more Demme's movie than a carbon copy of other people's.
-
50This single cautionary tale of how drug innocence gives way to woeful, hung-over experience proves to be way too predictable to effectively caution or even involve anyone.
-
50Depp's witty, spare performance gives the picture a poignancy -- a depth of feeling, if you'll allow the pun -- that Mr. Demme's hectic direction and the hurried script by David McKenna and Nick Cassavetes don't quite earn.
-
50When George’s fortunes start to go from bad to worse, so does the movie.
-
50A textbook case of a film that's befuddled by its subject.
-
50Only Depp and Ray Liotta (as Jung's father) manage to animate this tired formula.
-
40We've just been to this party before and we know how it ends, again and again and again.
-
40If any element takes us through the movie, it's him (Depp).
-
30This is an extraordinary -- and unfathomable -- piece of whitewashing: a true snow job.
-
30Blow works for a scene or two, then stalls.
-
30You can't make an epic about a mouse.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 20 out of 22
-
Mixed: 1 out of 22
-
Negative: 1 out of 22
-
8
-
This review contains spoilers, click full review link to view.
-
10