- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
90Sheridan’s actors work with their intellects fully engaged--and they engage us on levels we barely knew we had.
-
88This becomes Tobey Maguire's film to dominate, and I've never seen these dark depths in him before. Actors possess a great gift to surprise us, if they find the right material in their hands.
-
88The film is gripping---an honorable and beautifully acted addition to the tradition of homefront war stories.
-
88A heartbreaking film that speaks to the lifelong aftershocks of war, and to the powerful bonds of family and of love.
-
88Brothers is arguably the most successful remake of a foreign film since Martin Scorsese reworked "Infernal Affairs" into "The Departed" and won the Oscar.
-
75Brothers has the careful observation, measured pace and lived-in feeling of a good European film.
-
75In exploring the complicated nature of family bonds, Brothers is thought-provoking. The wounds inflicted by the cruelty of a troubled parent can prove as painful as battle scars.
-
75It does take half the movie before the story --really kicks in. When it does, it'll knock the air out of you.
-
70Shot for shot, Sheridan's approach isn't radically different from Bier's. And yet Bier gives us more to read between the lines: In her movie, there's an unspoken moodiness, a crackle of sexual tension, between Tommy and Grace's Danish counterparts. That understated but potent secret ingredient is missing from Sheridan's version, as sensitive and as artful as it is.
-
70A smart, well-meaning project -- never quite pulls itself together. It has a vague, half-finished feeling, as if it had not figured out what it was trying to do. Which may amount to a kind of realism -- an accurate reflection of where we are in Afghanistan.
-
70Brothers isn't up there in the empyrean of classic movies, but it is a solid drama -- about a family at war with itself.
-
70Bier's film succeeded on the merits of its actors, and this one offers fine performances by Portman and Gyllenhaal, but Maguire doesn't cut the mustard as the anguished military man.
-
60Irish director Jim Sheridan, who has made his films in America in recent years, now delivers an American remake that hues closely to the original but loses some of its true grit.
-
60Despite strong performances from the leads, when it comes to pacing and power, it’s the Danish original that edges it. Still, a sturdy and affecting remake that brings a powerful story to an even wider audience.
-
60Though it renders a convincing portrait of fractured family life and boasts its share of powerfully acted moments, this schematic tale of two siblings, ripped apart by jealousy, misunderstanding and unshakable trauma, plays like a more polished but less effective twin to the 2005 Danish original.
-
58Brothers isn't badly acted, but as directed by the increasingly impersonal Jim Sheridan, it's lumbering and heavy-handed, a film that piles on overwrought dramatic twists until it begins to creak under the weight of its presumed significance.
-
58The intrinsically powerful material occasionally pierces through.
-
50Brothers is a collection of strong moments that don't add up to anything. The movie is all build-up.
-
50Having seen the trailer for Brothers and now the finished film, I feel as though I just watched the trailer twice.
-
50This is a corny tale, told with both generous helpings of deli-sliced cheese and a brief stretch of chilling tumultuousness.
-
50It tries too hard too early.
-
50As a melodrama, Brothers is passable entertainment. But the film squanders the opportunity to meaningfully portray the impact of war on American lives.
-
50Brothers is too depthless to dredge up any tears.
-
50Sheridan seems as conflicted as the Cahills about their virtues and failings. The underlying themes -- love, loyalty, decency, duty, honor, betrayal -- that screenwriter David Benioff will use to both bind and break this family seem to bedevil him more than inspire him this time out.
-
50Portman doesn't overact or underact; she just stands around with whatever the appropriate expression for the scene seems to be on her sweet, pretty, childlike face. If there's something going on behind that face, I neither know nor care what it is, which means that long stretches of Brothers involving her character's interiority struck me as dramatically inert.
-
50With the exception of Jake Gyllenhaal, whose shambling self-disgust hits the only genuine note, the movie is a classic of Hollywood miscasting and ambition gone askew.
-
50Jake Gyllenhaal…the film’s only piece of believable acting.
-
42For a ripped-from-reality film about love and death and family strife in the face of the war in Afghanistan, Brothers is awfully artificial.
-
40It takes a long time for Brothers to become the movie it wants to be, and even then, it stumbles.
-
30Brothers tries to delve into how war can tear families apart, but only succeeds in showing how miscasting and melodrama obscure good intentions.
-
30Sheridan, repeatedly drawn to family sagas, including his own (2002's In America), aims for Greek tragedy but ends up with a PTSD melodrama, with Maguire able to produce slobber almost as effortlessly as Portman can summon up tears--essentially all her role calls for.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 35 out of 42
-
Mixed: 4 out of 42
-
Negative: 3 out of 42
-
5
-
StevenB.10This is the most emotionally effective film I have thus far seen in my life. Superb acting all around, and incredibly tense situations throughout.
-
9