- Studio: Magnolia Pictures
- Release Date: Jan 27, 2006
User Score
6.6
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 18 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 13 out of 18
-
Mixed: 2 out of 18
-
Negative: 3 out of 18
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
KevinG.Feb 18, 200610
-
-
JakeG.Jan 27, 20069
-
-
BenKJan 30, 20067A flim for the head more than for the heart. Perhaps one of the most authentic American films in its depictions of rural, working-class life but everything about the movie felt so pre-ordained I had litte emotional connection to what was happening on screen.
-
-
GeorgeR.Feb 2, 20067I
-
-
MaryW.Mar 10, 20061this is one of the most boring movies i have ever seen - including my in-laws' vacsation videos!
-
-
FilmfanJan 27, 20069I found this film to be very absorbing- the tone is very flat in a way that is completely fascinating. It seems like a cross between an Erroll Morris film and a Jeff Wall photograph, but the stylization does not reduce the presence of the actors. Laser sharp and refreshingly different.
-
-
SpongeeeKhodadadiJan 29, 20069Simple. Flat. Short. GREAT! When you get to the end, you want more but can walk out of the theater satisfied because anymore would be superfluous and spoil the emotion of the film. And that was some shady stuff how Rose took Kyle's money.
-
-
AlexF.Feb 1, 20069
-
-
JeffJ.Feb 15, 20064
-
-
EdwardV.Mar 12, 20061
-
-
20Bubble is among his (Soderbergh) worst films. What in the world was he thinking with this?
-
20An embarrassment to all concerned, the film was written, directed and produced by Soderbergh for reasons that are not readily apparent.
-
80The film doesn't judge or prod its characters, just watches the long fuse of the plot dwindle, then explode.