User Score
7.8 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 113 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 6 out of 113

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. AlexP
    Feb 16, 2008
    10
    This movie marked a turn for Di Caprio as a pretty face in terrible movies to a great actor in great movies. This movie is funny, smart, and moving and the acting does not disappoint either.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  2. PeterC.
    Nov 25, 2007
    10
    Way underrated, this is an exciting, quick, and well built movie with an excellent plot. Leo and Tom together work, but Tom does the better job.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. GraceA.
    Nov 25, 2007
    10
    I love it, a movie that can be watched over and over again and it will be good every time.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. RebeccaS.
    Oct 19, 2008
    9
    This movie is smart, witty and plays with the elements of classic 1970's movies; such as one flew over the cukoo's nest. A highly entertaining watch.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. EdM.
    Dec 26, 2008
    9
    Fantastic, witty, clever and nailbiting the entire time...J. Ryan G stop trying to be cleverer than everyone else all the fucking time and just enjoy a good film. you cunt !!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. J.RyanG.
    Jun 17, 2005
    4
    This film tries to be several things it is not: A comedy, a tragedy, an adventure, a mystery. When it actually becomes any of the above, it is only momentary, and by incidental contact. Not incidentally, as with most Spielberg films, we are obliged to make this film out to be something it never is, not even for a moment: Entertainment.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. [Anonymous]
    Jul 29, 2005
    8
    I like the style of the movie. Who knew stealing cash could be so fun? Unfortunately, Abagnale closed the book on that later (you'll know what i mean when you see the ending).
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. JamesM
    Dec 20, 2005
    7
    Not particularly impressive, but an entertaining film nonetheless.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. AlexZ.
    Jan 29, 2006
    7
    I liked the movie overall. It had its funny moments like his first case at the court after he watched TV. The acting was great too from both Tom Hanks and Leonardo DiCaprio. Though overall it was pretty repetitive and thus became a little bit boring the more it moved to the end. After the first hour I'd have probably given it a 10 but it was a tad too long in my opinion. It's still an entertaining movie and surely one of the better ones I've seen these days. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. IlirC.
    Jul 30, 2006
    9
    Great movie which keeps you in it until the very last second.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. Andy
    Jan 20, 2007
    6
    Was entertaining but somewhat disappointing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. BitBurn
    Aug 21, 2007
    8
    Highly entertaining.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. RadleyA.
    Sep 22, 2004
    10
    A very good and inspiring film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. IggyZ.
    Dec 31, 2002
    3
    Wanted to like CMIYC so much. The actors are among the best. SS is the best their is. Yet, despite this fact, the movie just does not seem to jell. LD's character is in need of psychological counseling from the beginning yet there is none. TH is very likeable but does act like an FBI agent. The movie is just too cluttered and long to make it fun and too involved in other areas to make it an intimate look into why we do the things we do. A big disappointment. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  15. JerryT.
    Jan 5, 2003
    7
    This movie was a good one, but it didnt catch my attention. I was sitting in the movies going wow this guy is really smart. and that was it. this is a movie to watch at home and not on the big screen. if ur thinking about watching this movie just wait till it comes out on dvd and watch it with ur family.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. AndyS.
    Jan 7, 2003
    2
    Is it possible Spielberg still enjoys making movies? A decent craftsman with what must be a nearly perfect visual memory (watching one of his movies is like watching a seamlessly edited pastiche of fifteen other movies), he nevertheless has developed into a director whose subtle awfulness rivals the flamboyant awfulness of George Lucas. His current effort is like a bored vampire indolently sucking the life from the typically workmanlike performance of Hanks, the typically unimaginative effort of DiCaprio, and even (eventually) the excellent work of Walken. A waste of what must have been a promising script. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  17. RajS.
    Dec 24, 2002
    7
    Speilberg pulls it off again. Keeping himself fresh by taking us back to the 60's. After two Sci-fi rounds, he shows us why we love him so much as a filmmaker. CMIYC is great storytelling. I had some difficulty with Christopher Walken as the father. He didn't bring us anything that diferentiated him from his other roles of past. All in all, worth the time and effort to go see.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. BarbT.
    Feb 23, 2003
    7
    Entertaining...but definitely not worth paying $$ to see it in the theatre. Wait for video!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. LassiterP.
    Jan 2, 2003
    2
    Forgettable as soon as you leave the theater. Too long, boring and dragged out. Not one of Speilberg's better works. DiCaprio and Hanks are just okay. If not for the names associated with its making, "Catch Me..." would be a bomb. Rent it.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  20. SheriL.
    Jan 3, 2003
    10
    Deserves a 10 based on DiCaprio's performance alone. He's sensational. Tom Hanks and Chris Walken were fine in supporting roles. Entertaining, classy, quality film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. AleksandarB.
    May 4, 2003
    8
    Although much of the book has been cut out from the movie, it still is a good one.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. Carrie
    May 30, 2003
    8
    I thought that this movie was very well made. The ditecting, filming and acting was profound. I really like how the movie shows the affects on divorce on parents and children. I couldnt belive that it is a true story! a very good movie!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. BonL.
    Jan 5, 2003
    10
    Masterpiece. Modern day classic.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. FantasyL.
    Dec 26, 2002
    6
    What can you say about Tom Hanks that has not been said already? He is his usual wonderful self and totally believable in his latest role as an FBI Agent tracking down LD. For me this film was just okay but not sensational as it seemed that it was the same scene repeated over and over. I found the film a bit too long. There are much better films playing during this holiday season.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. MrE.
    Mar 10, 2003
    9
    This moive is all round good and worthwhile. Only the fact that tom hanks has starred in so many much better films stops me from giving it 10!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. MikeM.
    Jan 7, 2003
    9
    Great movie, awesome cast. Frank Jr, learns the craft of the con from Frank Sr. and perfects it. Jennifer Garner can use this as a springboard to bigger and better things. Perhaps someday Leonardo will be as revered and versatile as Tom Hanks is today but it's still a wonderful performance. The film slowed a bit in parts but it shows why Frank Jr. decides that he can not live with his parents. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. LouisD.
    Jul 4, 2003
    9
    I have only to words to describe this movie : Must See!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. DaveZ.
    Dec 26, 2002
    9
    Excellent, enjoyable holiday flick. The 2 1/2 hours flew by. The cast, music, cinematography and atmosphere were all top notch. This was not an "epic" or an unforgettable classic, but it was a terrifically fun film to watch and very accessible.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. AnishaD.
    Dec 26, 2002
    4
    Frank Jr. visited Frank Sr. waayyyy too many times in this movie that played like a broken record. Apart from being mildly amused at Christopher Walken's portrayal of a slightly slimy dad, this film was borrrrinnggg.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  30. TimA.
    Jul 15, 2003
    9
    This movie was great, the story was fascinating! Frank is a genius!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. DanaG.
    Feb 10, 2003
    10
    Very good. Crime. Comedy and Altogether a very good movie. Unbeleivingly it's true.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. PaulM.
    Mar 16, 2003
    9
    A very fun movie to sit back and smile a lot. It's very sly and clever (yet it gets just a little repetitve). Tom Hanks and Leo D are great as Carl Hanratty and Frank W. Abagnale Jr. (Christopher Walken steals the show though)
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. SamB.
    Mar 1, 2003
    6
    Not great but worth a look.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. BlancoA.
    Dec 29, 2002
    7
    Not bad, but nothing special, either. What the hell was Martin Sheen doing in this movie? And why did the previews make it seem like Jennifer Garner had more than a bit part? Anyway, it's not the light-hearted fun I expected and wanted. A bit of a buzzkill.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. Mr.Tartan
    Dec 27, 2002
    5
    Anisha is right. Boring is the word. And too many visits to Walken as Leo's dad. This movie spends so much time trying to cover father figures, both real and surrogate, that it cheats us out of more fun. I read the book and they left out many good parts and added their own pointless ones. Go figure.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  36. MikeD.
    Dec 27, 2002
    8
    CMIYC was a full package: well acted, well directed and great music. Perhaps it was a bit too long, and there were some parts that were disjoined. Nonetheless, it was fun and kept you entertained and fidgety...
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. JackD.
    Jan 3, 2003
    8
    DiCaprio was so believable, I am surprised he didnt take over as Captain of the Titanic! Was this one based on Chuck Barris' life, too? Someone should tell Spielberg that they didnt use zip codes in 1963, but that is about the only problem I had with the movie. See it....
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. AnneM.
    Dec 26, 2002
    10
    One of the best films I've seen this year - well-acted and fun. DiCaprio is fantastic, you cannot help but to root for his character and Walken is perfectly cast as his Dad. It's not the light-hearted, slight movie some critics have made the film out to be either.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. JohnY.
    Jan 4, 2003
    5
    Bloated, overdone, lacking energy and jazz.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  40. AmyF.
    Jun 29, 2003
    10
    Very good. Great cast. Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks worked very good together. It's worth you're time to see it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  41. AmberP.
    Dec 31, 2002
    2
    Went to see this after watching Gangs of NY. CMIYC compared to GONY comes up as weak tea. Too much wasted time on LD's parents and not enough delving into the early childhood that caused him to act as he did. TH is his usual wonderful self, but he also comes across as weak tea as an FBI agent. Very disappointing.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  42. WalterF.
    Dec 31, 2002
    10
    Stevent Spielberg's film is always the best of the best.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  43. MichelleP.
    Feb 8, 2003
    10
    I loved this movie! Why did DiCaprio quit acting for what-- 5 years?! He's such a talented actor! Tom Hanks was fantastic too. Way to go!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  44. HashA.
    Apr 1, 2003
    10
    Spielberg is the best movie maker of all time.. he makes the best movies ever and the cleverest movies ever.. just think of the movies he has done... and if someone says he isnt good then he hasnt seen any of his movies...: SAVING PRIVATE RYAN, MINORITY REPORT, CATCH ME IF YOU CAN, EMPIRE OF THE SUN i mean come on i cant list them all!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  45. AndrewP.
    Jun 2, 2003
    7
    A very entertaining chase flick.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  46. ForresterT.
    Jan 4, 2003
    3
    Despite the great cast and director there is something missing. Just does not jell.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  47. JonA.
    Dec 29, 2002
    4
    What should have been a breezy delightful romp is ruined by Mr Spielberg's insistence to explain everything waaaaay too much. For instance, do we really need to know or care about the parents' breakup??? Way way way too long and overcomplicated for it's own good.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  48. ChadS.
    Dec 30, 2002
    8
    "Catch Me If You Can" will be reassesed as one of Spielberg's major films in ten-to-fifteen years. If you edit out Abagnale's encounter with the "Alias" babe, and keep the mother off-screen after the divorce, "Catch Me If You Can" might've been a better film. When it's light and breezy, Spielberg's follow-up to his masterpiece is an almost grand entertainment. But alas, DiCaprio has to look longingly into his mother's house. Oh, boo-hoo. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  49. JohnA.
    Dec 31, 2002
    7
    Great when Hanks is on screen, otherwise likeable, but flawed and not nearly as funny as the trailers would have you think. DiCaprio is left to carry this movie, and will not win any awards for his performance.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  50. BobS.
    Jan 5, 2003
    9
    This movie is extremely well acted and really proved everyone wrong when they said that Leonardo Dicaprio was over with. The story line is very strong and it's the kind of movie that you could see over and over again!
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  51. Shane
    Jun 28, 2003
    8
    I liked it. It never got boring at all. Although I would have liked to see moe of Tom Hanks.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  52. HalW.
    Nov 21, 2003
    9
    Excellent Movie, Intriguing storyline.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  53. PatC.
    Jan 13, 2004
    8
    Good show. Probably a good example of when the bending of reality for film is inconsequential. But isn't it strange how criminals develop skills sought by the government? Coming soon the sequel: Frank W. Abagnale, Henhouse Guard.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  54. Sep 19, 2010
    8
    Smart, intelligent, and even adept movie with exciting, quick, well-made stylistic writing, and powerful performances by Di Caprio makes this movie superb.
  55. Feb 22, 2011
    9
    This is easily the most underrated movie ever
  56. Apr 16, 2011
    7
    Underrated performance by Di Caprio who is excellent in this movie which starts well but I found it ran out of steam about half way through. Still an enjoyable movie and well worth a watch.
  57. Jan 21, 2012
    8
    A very entertaining and emotionally stimulating watch. Wouldn't say the film was unmissable but definitely a good use of some spare time. An interesting study of the sly and cunning of a legendary con artist , also on how simply appearance and sincerity on the exterior can affect human behaviour and confidence in the most powerful ways.
  58. May 16, 2012
    8
    Although too slight to make a serious dent, Catch Me If You Can is a very entertaining effort from Spielberg. I say 'effort', but it all seems so effortless. Everything combines excellently in this movie; the excellent performances, the breezy pacing, the tight script, the sumptuous period detail... It might not be epic or even particularly deep, but Catch Me If You Can makes for a fantastic popcorn flick. Expand
Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 38 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 34 out of 38
  2. Negative: 0 out of 38
  1. The movie could have used a further dose of the resonance Walken gives it, and a more intellectually adventurous director might have brought the theme close to home.
  2. Brilliant performances by DiCaprio as Frank Jr. and Christopher Walken as his fallen father - and an enjoyable one by Tom Hanks.
  3. 63
    Spielberg's inchoate attempts at cultural observation stretch the movie out and dilute the giddiness instead of adding a pleasurable spike. When the movie doesn't feel inflated, it feels soggy.